Please share with us the results of this. Show me the responses from the media. Show me the responses from the authorities.We are 100% confident talking with media and authorities in regards to this data PARTICULARLY since the data is provided FROM the relevant authorities!
Lyte, they are MISTAKEN
Huh? It wasn't cooked in any way whatsoever. The flight path is BASED OFF the eyewitnesses. Edward has it definitively crossing over to the north side of Columbia Pike. We have many other eyewitnesses further back in the flight path that confirm where he says it came from.And in at least one case, you cooked the 'evidence' of the plane flying over the navy annexe by failing to accurately marry two different views of the annexe and then projected a line which was at variance with your witness testimony.
This is where your logic fails. People's memories do not fail in the exact same way. ESPECIALLY when it is such a drastic difference to the actual event and ESPECIALLY when it is during an event of this magnitude from people with such perfect vantage points.
Huh? It wasn't cooked in any way whatsoever. The flight path is BASED OFF the eyewitnesses. Edward has it definitively crossing over to the north side of Columbia Pike. We have many other eyewitnesses further back in the flight path that confirm where he says it came from.
You cooked it.
You badly married up two views of the annexe and then placed his flightpath futher north than he'd drawn it.
Everyone else knows this except you.
Alarm bells should be ringing.
Why didn't they just crash the plane in the Pentagon again Lyte?
How does that work within the entire 9/11 plot?
Could you give me your summary of what happened that day?
Nah.
You guys sure seem to like speculation.
We have rock solid evidence proving the plane was on the north side of the citgo station.
If you don't understand the implications of this I suggest you read the ASCE Building Performance Report and come back to me for an explanation if you still don't get it.
That's funny.
I am stating that the people who collected the samples are different from the ones at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology who analyzed it.
Furthermore the people that provided the DNA samples to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology are also different from the ones that collected it.
That is how the government works. Everyone has a role. Everything is compartmentalized.
You can not prove where the DNA came from.
If the citgo witnesses are remotely correct in their placement of the plane we know for a FACT that it did not come from the Pentagon.
They were told it was from the pentagon.
Chain of custody.
Look it up.
From afip orgprove the chain of custody for the DNA was broken. also prove that DNA can be altered to make a match.
You claim to have sent your "rock solid evidence" to the media and the authorities. How about some links to where the media have published anything resulting from your "rock solid evidence". How about posting some responses you received from the authorities whom you've sent your "rock solid evidence". Surely if you have "rock solid evidence", the authorities would have responded.We have rock solid evidence proving the plane was on the north side of the citgo station.
To suggest we "coerced" these Pentagon Police officers into giving us this testimony on camera about such an historically important and politically charged event is ludicrous and you know it.
This is why true critical thinkers like Greening ridicule your approach to 9/11 data.
Lagasse even said he was on the starboard side of the plane way back back in 2003.
I have not ignored their original testimony at all.
They both clarified for everyone on camera that they did NOT see the light poles get clipped.
Nothing from their original testimony contradicts their placement of the plane on the north side of the station.
That's fact.
You can't claim that their "memories" all simultaneously failed so drastically in the same way.
It's not logical and it shows that your critical thinking skills are seriously lacking.
It is a logical fallacy to suggest that this article in ANY WAY proves the north of the citgo testimony false.
To AW Smith regading DNA;
Thanks for proving my point.
It was not the same people that collected, distributed, and analyzed the DNA.
Then the next step would be for you to investigate how "they" could have staged the damage to the Pentagon.
We can hypothesize that all day long but obviously we can not "investigate" that because the perpetrators have sequestered the physical evidence.
All you got here are discrepencies in eyewitness testimonies. Not much to make a case.Since only rogue elements could be the perpetrators we believe we will find honest figures in positions of authority who understand and investigate the implications of testimony that came from THEIR OWN OFFICERS and look into it accordingly.
DO YOU HAVE ANY ^O*&(D&Fda clue on how DNA evidence is collected and tested? DO YOU not know that hte SAME PEOPLE WHO collect the DNA ISN:T NECESSARILY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO TEST IT!