Jesus created Sex

[bruto]

Jer 13:10 This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing.

[qimg]http://blueletterbible.org/gifs/clearpixel.gif[/qimg]

Jeremiah does a much better job, than I could ever do answering that query. Thanks for asking it. Bruto. Paul and athiests do worship themselves, even though they are not gods and are nothing, and sadly good for nothing.

But then again, while there is life, there is hope.

It wasn't a query. Being good for nothing is not the same as being nothing and refusal to worship is not a form of worship anyway. You can redefine all you want but it doesn't make your errors true.

 

[Athyrio]

Jer 13:10 This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing.

http://blueletterbible.org/gifs/clearpixel.gif

Well, you know, if i was some primitive living over 2000 years ago and had no books to read or no other way to gather knowledge than to listen to the spewings of some eaters of dung-cakes like the prophets, then i might actually take heed of you.

 

[Foster Zygote]

Why are evolutionists so afraid and fearful !!!

They have no evidence, they have no proofs and yet the false skeptics love the excuse the evolutionary priest hood in their white gowns gives them. They swallow their lies without question just like they swallow the lies of their government trench coated ones.

David, if you are not afraid (and fearful) then why won't you explain why you altered the dates of your prophecy regarding the end times. Please, it would really help your credibility if you would at least address the issue instead of ignoring it.

 

[Foster Zygote]

White gowns indeed.

 

[Taffer]

Taffer, I have answered you over and over agin, and whn I ask just one answer from you, you demand that I again answer you FIRST.

No you, and Dirkson, another evolutionists that wants a private debate.... answer HERE.

What evidence you have that Sexuality evolved. Separately and yet cohesively together through millions of beneficial mutations that were held recessive til they magically appeared simulatnaeously in bioth genders, and both genders then magically realized they loved the NEW LOOK, and started mating like rabbits before the NEW LOOK genetics died off.

If you think you've answered every point in my post, could you please post the link to your response? Because I have missed it. The only response I have gotten from you is to one single question from a post of mine which had several questions. And the question you answered wasn't even from that post. If you think you have answered the post, give me the link to your reply.

 

[Paulhoff]

Why are evolutionists so afraid and fearful !!!

They have no evidence, they have no proofs and yet the false skeptics love the excuse the evolutionary priest hood in their white gowns gives them. They swallow their lies without question just like they swallow the lies of their government trench coated ones.

No evidence.......evolutionary priest hood............white gowns......government trench coated ones................



Paul



Yea, digging around in the rocks and dirt in white gowns....................

 

[Davidjayjordan]

True history comes from true scientists that know real life and get their hands dirty with experiemtns in the real world not from system indocrinated geologists that have been trained to preach the staus quo and keep delusions in place to obtain more funding through artifical findings or false conclusions based on false assumptions.

SEE Creation scientists or discern true scientists.

For no where in their diggings have they come up with the startings of a penus or a opening that was turning into a vagina.

Please state your evolutionary evidence and supporting documentation and pictures.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Darn evolutionists think they can post a dirty geologist as if they are proof that their minds haven't been tainted and their diggings valid.

Evolutionists are so shallow and feeble minded and DESPERATE.

They have no evidence... and when they try to explain things, it is so full of religious terms like maybe, should have might have been HOPE and FAITH ....etc... etc...

And yet they deem their religion a science and literally force it upon others.

 

[fuelair]

Please feel free DJ to dine on the appropriate parts of a dead armadillo.
I'm sure you will find it to be a religious experience.

 

[slingblade]

And that, folks, is the end of the thread.

Nothing to see here, nothing to say. Further pointless wanking is hereby prohibited, and those desiring additional pointless wankage are directed to have their heads examined carefully and immediately.


We appreciate your participation in this thread, with the understanding that the words "appreciate" and "participation" may, in some cases, more accurately be translated as: "STFU" and "Golly, you're a really BIG wanker, aren't you? And so pointless!"

Refunds may be had at the east window.

 

[bruto]

True history comes from true scientists that know real life and get their hands dirty with experiemtns in the real world not from system indocrinated geologists that have been trained to preach the staus quo and keep delusions in place to obtain more funding through artifical findings or false conclusions based on false assumptions.

SEE Creation scientists or discern true scientists.

For no where in their diggings have they come up with the startings of a penus or a opening that was turning into a vagina.

Please state your evolutionary evidence and supporting documentation and pictures.

Given your declared propensities, I probably shouldn't ask how you got your hands dirty in the pursuit of sexual knowledge, but I haven't so far seen anything that even remotely resembles science from you.

I will spare the bandwidth, and not repost the evidentiary picture I posted above. But the polydactyl cat remains a refutation of your assertion about the inability of mutants to find a mate and procreate.

The exact origin of sex remains a mystery, but your explanation does not help, the more so since the ideas on which you base it are so preposterously false. You still have not explained how you can state, as you did above, that no genetic evolution is possible because any mutation at all would result in procreative failure and ostracism, thus conspicuously ignoring clear and common evidence to the contrary.

And, in case you really had not figured it out, sex does not require a penis and a vagina. Many plants reproduce sexually too, as do many animals which do not have the apparatus you describe.

Did you really manage to pass a biology course without discovering that a frog has no penis?

Even if it is not possible to pin down exactly how sex evolved, it certainly, absolutely, unequivocally, obviously and manifestly does not require the discovery of proto-genitals, and even the most cursory look at the multitudinous ways in which sex occurs in nature should make that abundantly obvious to anybody who is not either insane, stupid, or purposely arguing falsehoods.

 

[Foster Zygote]

penus

 

[fuelair]

As in the famous quote: The penus mightier than the sward!

 

[bruto]

When old Jehovah made the earth,
He set the rules for giving birth.
Like god himself, we're all mammalia,
Sporting lovely genitalia.
But missing from the holy text
Is reference to lesser sex.
The frog and squash are nowhere cited,
But must their needs be unrequited?
No, thankfully, the problem's solved,
For other methods have evolved.
There's more to life than Mars and Venus,
And birds and bees don't need a penis.

 

[Foster Zygote]

As in the famous quote: The penus mightier than the sward!

There was a Family Guy episode in which they wrote "PENUS" on Quagmire's face after he passed out drunk.

 

[Cosmo]

And that, folks, is the end of the thread.

Nothing to see here, nothing to say. Further pointless wanking is hereby prohibited, and those desiring additional pointless wankage are directed to have their heads examined carefully and immediately.


We appreciate your participation in this thread, with the understanding that the words "appreciate" and "participation" may, in some cases, more accurately be translated as: "STFU" and "Golly, you're a really BIG wanker, aren't you? And so pointless!"

Refunds may be had at the east window.

http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm

 

[Foster Zygote]

And that, folks, is the end of the thread.

Nothing to see here, nothing to say. Further pointless wanking is hereby prohibited, and those desiring additional pointless wankage are directed to have their heads examined carefully and immediately.


We appreciate your participation in this thread, with the understanding that the words "appreciate" and "participation" may, in some cases, more accurately be translated as: "STFU" and "Golly, you're a really BIG wanker, aren't you? And so pointless!"

Refunds may be had at the east window.

Recent photo of this thread.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Seeing the supposed expert evolutionists who want to discuss other topics concerning evolution on their own thread have turned tail and RUN. It seems not so bright is the only evolutionist who is willing to give a shot at explaining how sex came about and he says it is a mystery. In other words, he doesn;t know, hasn't got a clue, because evolution has absolutely no answer as to how two genders could evolve simulataneously via miracle mutations that make it sexier and compatable and attractive to the opposite gender.

The exact origin of sex remains a mystery, (But false skeptics can not solve mysteries and find answers and so just trust their religion of evolution) but your explanation does not help, the more so since the ideas on which you base it are so preposterously false. (Bruto wildly trying to throw accussations against the design of the deisgner who obviously had a plan in developing the genders...complete and whole and healthy and reproductive) You still have not explained how you can state, as you did above, that no genetic evolution is possible because any mutation at all would result in procreative failure and ostracism, thus conspicuously ignoring clear and common evidence to the contrary. ((If you had evodence, you would not have said sexual development is a mystery. therefore you are contradicting yourself to the max.Evolution is not a cover all phrase that one just needs to accept by FAITH, and hope it eventually answers some questions to the niave))

And, in case you really had not figured it out, sex does not require a penis and a vagina. ((In human reproduction it does... and the vagina and penis did not evolve in design since creation Show me the evidence it has. We are the same as the first humans.... no difference))

Many plants reproduce sexually too, as do many animals which do not have the apparatus you describe. ((But we are talking HERE about human sexuality. So quite getting away from the topic..... just because you can;t explain the mystery of sexuality....and want us just to believe in your god of evolution))

Did you really manage to pass a biology course without discovering that a frog has no penis? ((And humans that have no balls could have been castrated or have castrated themselves. But again, you have no answerrs so try to cloud the waters with frogs. ))

Even if it is not possible to pin down exactly how sex evolved, it certainly, absolutely, unequivocally, obviously and manifestly does not require the discovery of proto-genitals, and even the most cursory look at the multitudinous ways in which sex occurs in nature should make that abundantly obvious to anybody who is not either insane, stupid, or purposely arguing falsehoods.

Yes, you are trying to evade that you just don't know as your opening remarks stated. Sex is a mystery to evolutionists and they have absolutely no answer as to how it evolved.....

But surely there is an intelligent evolutionist whio could do better than Bruto's brutal denial and then attempted explanation. But then again, how can an evolutionist be intelligent. Evolutionary doctrine makes one stupid not intelligent.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Come on Taffer and Drustin, help your brother in the FAITH, Bruto .....as he has truly over stepped the laymens bounds in trying to explain evolution when you guys have so skillfully avoided trying to explain how evolution created SEX.

Help him out in his houir of need, as the massdes and congregation may lose FAITH in the evolutionary god when Bruto so messed up evolutionary scriptures of luck and chance.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

It took almost 700 posts, but finnally I enticed an evolutionist into admitting they haven;t got a clue, how evolution created sex.

My thanks to bruto for being honest and stating that Sex to evolutionists is a mystery. They haven't got a clue, how it evolved.

Sex was designed from the beginning, adults were created in full mature states rather than developing through different stages of sexuality. Sex is by design of the designer, just as it takes a builder to build a building.