• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change--the Rematch

WildCat said:
Just having fun w/ a stereotype, obviously some are bright guys. Decider sure isn't one of them though.
Click to expand...


No worries, I was mostly just having fun back. :) I am still new enough here that it will take some time to prove I could be bright. Strangely enough, it wouldn't take any time at all to prove the opposite (as some have shown).
 
T.A.M. said:
WTC7 would be a good issue to do an entire show on...
Click to expand...

Agreed.

I'd love to see Jason and Dylan explain how WTC7 was demolished without FDNY involvement.

I never get tired of watching twoofers stumbling through that minefield.
 
CHF said:
I never get tired of watching twoofers stumbling through that minefield.
Click to expand...
The CTist's want to think they are "everyman", champions of the underdog, supporters of working men and women. Against, big government, big business, NWO etc. etc. That's why they won't implicate police, firemen and other first responders.

But, as you note, they're not smart enough to come up with schemes which don't implicate those very people.
 
WildCat said:
...
Maybe your hero Rob Balsamo will actually have the guts to post here? Of course he doesn't, because he's a low-life coward who refuses to debate on a public forum where the entire world can see that he has no case.
Click to expand...

JDX did post here for a while as "Weedwacker" and someone else, which led to him being banned for sock puppetry .
 
A rematch would be excellent.

I doubt that the Loose With the Truth boys, however, will be anxious to be thoroughly out-debated and thoroughly embarrassed again, though.
 
DavidJames said:
The CTist's want to think they are "everyman", champions of the underdog, supporters of working men and women. Against, big government, big business, NWO etc. etc. That's why they won't implicate police, firemen and other first responders.
Click to expand...

A big part of it is also the fact that they're not dumb enough to claim FDNY involvement after 340+ of their guys died that day.

No twoofer would have the balls to accuse the FDNY within earshot of a firefighter.
 
CHF said:
No twoofer would have the balls to accuse the FDNY within earshot of a firefighter.
Click to expand...

That's cause most 9/11 twoofers spend their day sitting in a basement pounding a keyboard, firefighters spend their day in the gym pounding a punching bag..... :hit:
 
pomeroo said:
Tarpley expressed an interest in appearing on the show. Apparently, he was frightened off by the links to the debates that I provided in response to his request for more information.
Click to expand...

Tarpley doesn't make sense for a Gravy debate. He would talk about history and precedent and philosophy and junk like that, which is of no interest to you guys.

It should be Kevin Ryan.
 
skepticalcriticalguy said:
Tarpley doesn't make sense for a Gravy debate. He would talk about history and precedent and philosophy and junk like that, which is of no interest to you guys.

It should be Kevin Ryan.
Click to expand...

SCG, none of these people "make sense," because they are raving incompetents. But since they're your leaders, that's all we've got.

Why don't you contact Ryan? Remind him that he declined to debate me under terms that were exceedingly favorable to him. Post his reply here.
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
SCG, none of these people "make sense," because they are raving incompetents. But since they're your leaders, that's all we've got.

Why don't you contact Ryan? Remind him that he declined to debate me under terms that were exceedingly favorable to him. Post his reply here.
Click to expand...

In post #56 I asked you if you could travel to debate, and whether Ryan declined you or just never replied. And how long ago.
 
skepticalcriticalguy said:
In post #56 I asked you if you could travel to debate, and whether Ryan declined you or just never replied. And how long ago.
Click to expand...
Read my terms more carefully next time. I said the choice of location was his. He replied, and declined.
 
Paul Craig Roberts says: "Griffin is a person who is sensitive to evidence, logic, and scientific reasoning. There is no counterpart on the official side of the story who is as fully informed on all aspects of the attacks as Griffin."

http://vdare.com/roberts/070326_evidence.htm

That is a total lie. Griffin know nothing. And is there anyone more informed than Mark? I doubt it. I would like to see Griffin vs. Mark, but I guess Griffin never dares to do that. He would lose his face.


 
Crungy said:
Mark, if you ever need technical support to plug up that UL listed water dyke, contact me. I know of a leading structural engineer who has been slandered by this nutbar creep and would love to expose his sham science.
Click to expand...

Chi-town or NYC? (Or Mississippi?) Shoot me a PM...just curious...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom