• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New Member

But that explosion doesn't belong with the footage, and the things that indicate this aren't going to change in the other versions of the tape.

-Gumboot

Your concerns have been heard, but I think I will wait for expert analysis and not trust an anonymous poster analysing youtube. No disrespect intended. :)
 
Wasn't the largest haul of heroin in Florida history found in one of Hillard's Planes and nobody was arrested for it?
A plane leased from his company. The smuggler was arrested. There is zero reason to believe that Hilliard had any involvement or connection to the smuggler.
 
It's just another coincidence then.
First, I'm concerned that you knew one part of the story but not the other.

Second, what is it a coincidence with? Do you know of any dealings between the drug smuggler and the terrorists?

Third, are you aware that Hopsicker thinks Adnan Khashoggi was behind the 9/11 attacks. If so, do you know of ANY corroborating evidence for that assertion?
 
What you have to realise, Tonicblue, is that sound provides about 80% of your interpretation of a video that has sound. What you are "seeing" gets heavily influenced by the sound accompanying it, so much so that it's very common to think something is happening when actually it isn't. This is very well known in the film industry, and it's something that filmmakers exploit constantly.




Case in point.
 
Hey, no problem. I appreciate that you are probably overwhelmed and any reply you can make is great.

However, the point I am trying to make is that what makes a CD a CD is what happens *before* the building starts to collapse. Because once it starts to collapse, the CD part of it is over, and gravity takes over.

Nonsense - I have read detailed descriptions of how they can drop one half of a building first and pull the other half on top of it, by delaying the sequence slightly on one side and using cables. I have also heard the process described as "cutting a building up and putting it in its own basement". Maybe I'll look for the links but this is basic stuff.
 
Hello, tonicblue.

I don't have the ability to analyze the audio, and I'm fine with it being an explosion if it's not faked. And? There were many explosions after each tower collapse.

But thats like being fine with it being an elephant, if it was a picture of an elephant, or one of your spoons.

It's not, and there is not a hint of it being faked.
 
But thats like being fine with it being an elephant, if it was a picture of an elephant, or one of your spoons.

It's not, and there is not a hint of it being faked.

The explosion video is not faked either. I would like to get an audio expert to look at them both, but don't know any.
 
But thats like being fine with it being an elephant, if it was a picture of an elephant, or one of your spoons.

It's not, and there is not a hint of it being faked.
My point, as I stated above, is so what if it is an explosion? There were many explosions after each of the 9/11 collapses. What's your point, scooby?
 
The explosion video is not faked either. I would like to get an audio expert to look at them both, but don't know any.
There have been sounds added to youtube videos, and that means they are fake. One was so bad you could find the old video on youtube also.

Good luck finding them but then if you are CT minded you may want to not find them. So if you are CT minded stop searching now.

There were no explosives set to bring down the WTC complex. Just planes and fire and the release of energy in the towers due to g.

If you are looking for explosive sounds there are many. No RDX sounds found yet, maybe due to lack of explosives used to bring down the WTC.

Of course maybe I have missed something for 5 years.

There are some videos that have fake sound. That is a fact. Good luck finding them. (some are in the past threads, it is like looking for tax paper work, they could be hiding in any folder/thread)
 
I don't consider Jones an investigative journalist, really. More a PT Barnum type.

Yeah he's the Steve Irwin of 911 Truth really isn't he?

He's a bit commercial, and he is like a circus barker, but at the end of the day he's a good source of information and he seems genuine. He does tend to interrupt his guests a bit too much - likes the sound of his own voice.
 

Back
Top Bottom