What is a conspiracy theorist?

beachnut said:
If you can comprehend this, it says the steel core would fall in the wind without the shell.

Your very post debunks you.

BTW, you need to look at the other photo on the page you photo is showing some core but the shell has to support the core or the wind will blow it over. The core, 110 stories of the core did not go up first, you need to google some more.
Click to expand...

Psst, should we tell him about the concrete core and all that 3"x4' stuff? :boxedin:
 
skepticalcriticalguy said:
Yeah, Thyssan "repudiated" Nazism; to save his Nazi ass.

You mention Communism; I don't think I ever said anything about Communism.

Funding doesn't imply control? Huh. Since when?
Click to expand...


First - He repudiated it in 1937, was subsquency incarated by HItler, transfered to Dachau in 1945 - was one of the few to survive

Second - "funding of Nazi/Communism."

Third - I dunno, would you argue that every college student who applied for a federal loan is under control of the government?

ETA: It may be a weak argument, but it does follow sometimes.
 
Last edited:
skepticalcriticalguy said:
Much of this "evidence" has been debunked, to the same degree that you folks have debunked all the contrary evidence.
Click to expand...
Sticking your fingers in your ears and going "lalalalalala" is not debunking.

As I've said, one man's debunk is another man's "eh."
Click to expand...
Especially if the other man has no knowledge of science, physics, construction, explosives, fire engineering, structural engineering, material science, military protocols or reality in general.

And so the game continues.
Click to expand...
Of course it's all a game to you, isn't it?
 
SkepticGuy said:
That the coconut could have arrived here tied to two African Swallows.

Now begone you silly Ka-nig-it or I shall taunt you again.
Click to expand...

I assume from your little display of pique that you are one of those cretinous
CTers - I do you the justice of not assuming yet that you are a Holocaust Denier.
 
skepticalcriticalguy said:
As I might have mentioned, to some it's a game about comebacks and scores. And "burns." Grow the hell up.
Click to expand...
You are.

And due to the simple lack of facts and pure ability to believe lies.

I present the conspiracy theorist; you. Good job, do not ruin you perfect record of zero facts, you may no longer be a CT when you learn how to use that glob of neurons behind those eyes.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
You are.

And due to the simple lack of facts and pure ability to believe lies.

I present the conspiracy theorist; you. Good job, do not ruin you perfect record of zero facts, you may no longer be a CT when you learn how to use that glob of neurons behind those eyes.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the insult NUT. You know little about me.

Keep your competitive little world going. Keep keying in on the LC forum.

Want a "fact?" I read 9/11 Synthetic Terror Made In The USA. You did not.

There. A fact for you.

And now an opinion: ya oughtta.
 
Last edited:
skepticalcriticalguy said:
Thanks for the insult NUT. You know little about me.

Keep your competitive little world going. Keep keying in on the LC forum.

Want a "fact?" I read 9/11 Synthetic Terror Made In The USA. You did not.

There. A fact for you.

And now an opinion: ya oughtta.
Click to expand...
Here are some facts:

Webster Tarpley the nut case, why his book is so much trash you have to be brain dead to think it is worth anything. Zero facts, zero evidence, to support idiot ideas. You have won the CTer award for being unable to find facts when you think you have facts. Not sure what to say to explain why WT's book is so bad. But if you like it, that says it all.

Let me say this about that! The fact is if people believe his nonsense and junk, it is scary people can be that dumb. How did everyone fail all those people in their education? (you must be kidding, right?)

OR let me say this! That is a dangerous book, full of lies and only idiots would believe WT. No one can be dumb enough to buy that book! You can find all this crap for free on the internet, and it is still junk. (dangerous because some people believe his lies and junk; I was wondering who was dumb enough to buy his books but I found some idiots or WT is writing some good reviews like other CT idiots do. They log on to Amazon and write under different names about how good their book is; now that is a CT)

Or, I have no idea why you are so paranoid to believe the junk in that book. Sad to believe you are unable to see the junk in his book and you place this at the top of your list, since it is moronic pulp. (ask any body)

Webster Tarpley, wow, you are a big woo CTer! Got me beat (BTW, Webster has no facts either, you must not read very well; have you been checked for being challenged to read and understand?)
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Here are some facts:

Webster Tarpley the nut case, why his book is so much trash you have to be brain dead to think it is worth anything. Zero facts, zero evidence, to support idiot ideas. You have won the CTer award for being unable to find facts when you think you have facts. Not sure what to say to explain why WT's book is so bad. But if you like it, that says it all.

Let me say this about that! The fact is if people believe his nonsense and junk, it is scary people can be that dumb. How did everyone fail all those people in their education? (you must be kidding, right?)

OR let me say this! That is a dangerous book, full of lies and only idiots would believe WT. No one can be dumb enough to buy that book! You can find all this crap for free on the internet, and it is still junk. (dangerous because some people believe his lies and junk; I was wondering who was dumb enough to buy his books but I found some idiots or WT is writing some good reviews like other CT idiots do. They log on to Amazon and write under different names about how good their book is; now that is a CT)

Or, I have no idea why you are so paranoid to believe the junk in that book. Sad to believe you are unable to see the junk in his book and you place this at the top of your list, since it is moronic pulp. (ask any body)

Webster Tarpley, wow, you are a big woo CTer! Got me beat (BTW, Webster has no facts either, you must not read very well; have you been checked for being challenged to read and understand?)
Click to expand...

So, you have read it then?

What a pathetic post, NUT.
 
As for controlled demolitions with explosives-- in any of the WTC buildings-- I refer to what a controlled demolition sounds like not what it "looks" like. It doesn't take much time to realize, a blind person could tell the difference.

I have a couple of threads on ATS that I have supplied some of those "hip'N'easy YTube clips" to pound my point homeward. Any controlled demo with audio has distinct synchonized series of explosions. Anything less and there wouldn't be any visual "free fall speed of collapse"..because all of the supports would not be eliminated (due to explosives) at virtually the same time. Furthermore, the very real points of support in a structure do not change. So it matters not if the controlled demolition was a "public" or "clandestine' operation.

IOW if the huge buildings that fell on 9/11 were due to explosive charges LOUD_AS_HELL synchronized explosives..We all would have known 5.5 years ago. Go listen to any controllded Demolition vid with sound-- and compare that to ANY 9/11 account with sound..and you will find this preposterous allegation ...unreasonable.

~laginappe~ I would post my "comparison audio" here..but forgive me..i.m.newb meow
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom