• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

BBC2 Conspiracy Files 9/11

cludgie said:
Link to the BBC 'Points of View' message board I mentioned earlier

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbpointsofview/F1951566
Click to expand...
OMG!

And they had the wife of someone who died saying that all conspiracy theorists are insulting the families of the people who died (cue the sad music) But didn't mention the group call The Jersey Girls. A group of 900 women who lost people all wanting to seek the truth.
Click to expand...
The Bin Laden cofession tape that has now been proved as fake by the FBI. So fake that they have said that Bin Laden is off there top 10 most wanted list due to lack of evidence.

9 of the hijackers have been found alive and never have been to america.
Click to expand...
I can assure you this is NOT true. The majority of the american people believe that the government had something to do with 9/11, in fact a recent poll said that 86%
Click to expand...
This in the three first messages!
 
Yes, the 86% poll made me laugh somewhat too. Where did they conduct that? At a 9/11 Truthers convention?
 
Those 4 posts from teh BBC website/forum have to be some of the stupidest CT stuff I have heard in a while. I guess they don't make CTers over there like they do on this side of the pond.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Those 4 posts from teh BBC website/forum have to be some of the stupidest CT stuff I have heard in a while. I guess they don't make CTers over there like they do on this side of the pond.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

We do. However, our main conspiracy theory is the one that says Princess Diana was assassinated by MI5. The idea of a conspiracy theory behind 9/11 probably came as a surprise to most of the British people who watched that programme.
 
wow, i love how they juxtaposed fetzers "claim" of remote control from the c130 then they actually interviewed the C130 pilot; and thereby accusing this pilot of being apart of the crime?

why can't truthers do this?

fetzer is delusional. this bbc program just put the truth movement into the real light; that they are bunch of bungling idiots without no modicum of basic understanding to know what can happen and what really happened.

Alex Kischeimer had it right; its just flawed people that have to have something to dream about...

Part 4 was awesome. Those that lived in the area of 93's crash site saw the debris falling.. what was it ? Paper! Insulation! ...

again, truthers just love to speuclate and dont bother to talk to the PEOPLE WHO WERE THERE! Love how Dylan is aruging about what Wally Miller (coroner) was stating something, but can't see that the coroner meant something else! Take one quote out of context and he continues to fight the interviewer about it! What a tool. and he got schooled about what a simile is!!!
 
Well, now THAT put WTC7 to rest. *High fives JREFers* Now, I'm 30% LIHOPer as promised!
Oh wait, no it didn't. Never mind... :o
 
Arus808 said:
wow, i love how they juxtaposed fetzers "claim" of remote control from the c130 then they actually interviewed the C130 pilot; and thereby accusing this pilot of being apart of the crime?
Click to expand...


My favourite bit about that was a few minutes earlier he categorically stated that no plane hit The Pentagon, that there was no evidence, and that anyone who said otherwise was a liar.

And then he says the plane that hit The Pentagon was controlled by remote via the C-130.

Astounding. Actually... I'm going to nominate him for a Stundie.

-Gumboot
 
Highly amusing attempt to debunk the BBC piece, including putting forward Stephen Jones' thermite theory as one that should've been seriously considered regarding the collapse. Oh and apparently the 1945 B-25 Empire State Building crash was somehow a useful precedent that should've been mentioned...

http://debunking-bbc.blogspot.com/
 
alexg;2355839 At least one error I think; they showed the old 'pancake' collapse theory for the TTs where the trusses fail said:
Just a technicality? This shows how poorly researched this documentary was. They couldn't even get the right reason for the collapse of the towers.
Click to expand...
 
I found the Purdy (?) University professor responsible for that simulation of the plane going into the Pentagon. The poor fellow looked like he trod on a land mine as he described the hate mail he got over the research. I almost think he was unaware of the whole conspiracy thing.

And the revelation of how far Indian lakes is from the Shanksville crash site.... A true Kodak momment
 
MG1962 said:
I found the Purdy (?) University professor responsible for that simulation of the plane going into the Pentagon. The poor fellow looked like he trod on a land mine as he described the hate mail he got over the research. I almost think he was unaware of the whole conspiracy thing.

And the revelation of how far Indian lakes is from the Shanksville crash site.... A true Kodak momment
Click to expand...


What on earth did the Purdy guy mean when he said it was the weight of the liquid in the wings that damaged the pentagon?
 
Aphelion said:
Just a technicality? This shows how poorly researched this documentary was. They couldn't even get the right reason for the collapse of the towers.
Click to expand...

If I remember rightly they mentioned the correct theory but showed one of the wrong graphics (the pancake animation). Before that they did show an animated graphic of the truss failures.

And CT'ers are the last ones on earth who should be calling anyone when it comes to minor innaccuracies or errors.
 
What on earth did the Purdy guy mean when he said it was the weight of the liquid in the wings that damaged the pentagon?
Click to expand...

He was talking about the weight of the fuel. From memory a Litre of fluid weighs a kilo, which is 2.2 pounds, and there is 4.5 lites to the gallon. Because the main body of the craft was effectively a hollow tube it distintergrated very quickly
 
MG1962 said:
He was talking about the weight of the fuel. From memory a Litre of fluid weighs a kilo, which is 2.2 pounds, and there is 4.5 lites to the gallon. Because the main body of the craft was effectively a hollow tube it distintergrated very quickly
Click to expand...


Jet-A fuel weighs 6.84 pounds per gallon (nominal density which changes depending on temperature etc).

-Gumboot
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom