BBC 9/11: The Conspiracy Files

Aphelion said:
When that press conference occured it was still nearly a year until the investigation began.
Click to expand...
gumboot said:
What about the other investigations?
Click to expand...
Aphelion said:
The other investigations were concerned with building safety, not terrorism:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
gumboot said:
Really?

Hmm... interesting. Why were the FBI involved in an investigation about building safety?
Click to expand...
Aphelion said:
They weren't. They conducted a criminal investigation. Not the kind of investigation the families meant.
Click to expand...
WildCat said:
So what kind of investigation did "the families" want?
Click to expand...
Aphelion, please respond to this.

First you claimed that no investigation took place until over a year after the Bush statement about bin Laden.

Then you said that only a building investigation took place.

Then you said that a criminal investigation took place, but that's not what the families wanted.

That's three different and contradicting statements from you about the 9/11 investigations in three posts.

Does it occur to you that you have no idea of what you're talking about? Are you embarrassed at all by your behavior? (And this isn't even including your NORAD errors.) You are indeed far from the sun.
 
(dammit, I was trying to figure out a joke and highlight my nerdy scientific knowledge of the meaning of aphelion, but Gravy managed it.)
 
When you say "Not the kind of investigation the families meant." you obviously really mean "Not the kind of investigation the conspiracy theorists meant.".
 
MG1962 said:
I just finished watching the documentary. There is a momment at about the 30 minute mark I think will haunt me the rest of my life.

It is an audio clip, of two unidentified controllers or emergency workers or such

Male voice: We have confirmed flight 93 is down

Excited female voice: What! Its down, its landed?

Male voice: No its (pause) down

Female voice: Oh.......................................

I would love Jones, Avery and this gang of excrement, to get locked in a room with some of the people involved in trying to deal with that day and see how long they last.
Click to expand...

The moment that always haunts me is in the Naudet Brother's documentary. Where you catch a glimpse of the FDNY Chaplain's face. The despair on his face is striking, made even more haunting by the knowledge that he died soon afterwards and is listed as the first FDNY casualty of that day.
 
After reading how pissed off some CTers are about the doc, I can't wait to see it. Did the BBC make it avaiable for purchase yet or is it on youtube?
 
I forget the mans name - the phone call from the World Trade Center just before it collapses. Thats seriously crap.
 
chillzero said:
Indeed.
I would recommend that people do no listen to it if, like me, they tend to replay things that impact them a lot - like in dreams, or daydreams.

That clip upset me terribly, and has come back to haunt me on several occasions.
:(
Click to expand...
I forgot about this but now I do remember listening to it once.

I won't listen again...it is THAT disturbing.
 
MG1962 said:
I just finished watching the documentary. There is a momment at about the 30 minute mark I think will haunt me the rest of my life.

It is an audio clip, of two unidentified controllers or emergency workers or such

Male voice: We have confirmed flight 93 is down

Excited female voice: What! Its down, its landed?

Male voice: No its (pause) down

Female voice: Oh.......................................

I would love Jones, Avery and this gang of excrement, to get locked in a room with some of the people involved in trying to deal with that day and see how long they last.
Click to expand...

Likewise, I would like to see you locked in a room with Donna O'Conner and tell her she's a nutbar.
 
Aphelion said:
Likewise, I would like to see you locked in a room with Donna O'Conner and tell her she's a nutbar.
Click to expand...

That sounds like you're implying that she is violent.

All that they would need is to be shown where the conspiracy is wrong. Just because they are family members does not mean that their opinion on the Controlled Demolition theory is anymore valid than yours.
 
JAStewart said:
That sounds like you're implying that she is violent.

All that they would need is to be shown where the conspiracy is wrong. Just because they are family members does not mean that their opinion on the Controlled Demolition theory is anymore valid than yours.
Click to expand...

So MG1962 must have been implying that the ATCs are violent?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom