Magically Healing Steel Columns

TruthSeeker1234 said:
http://www.veronicachapman.com/nyc911/NoDamage.JPG


OK OCTs, have fun explaining the physics of this one. To my eyes, it looks like the plane has half-entered the building. The right wing tip is showing, and the rest of the wing is already inside. But it looks like the steel beams have magically healed! The gaping plane-shaped hole doesn't appear until after the explosion.
Click to expand...

To recap the entire, beautiful debunk that just took place, I will summarise the above posts:

Resolution. Engines.

Thankyou for your time. I guess I'll miss LossLea...oh wait, you say he hasn't been banned?
 
Troofer1234, you are incorrect. The resolution of that video is too low to make determinations of the nature you are making.

Take it from someone who knows.

-Gumboot
 
wtc_towers_exterior.jpg


Bring back a picture with this kind of resolution, TS1234. Do you see those stripes? Can you see those stripes that clearly in your framegrabs? Until you have a framegrab that does show those stripes clearly, you've got nothing.
 
jaydeehess said:
Both engines are visible and thus the wings are not already 'inside'.
Click to expand...
I thought about that, too, but instead I think the engines have just entered the building and the brighter spots you're seeing are not the engines themselves, but the dust clouds from the impact of the engines that have just gone in.

Here is a stabilized version of that video:
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
[qimg]http://www.veronicachapman.com/nyc911/NoDamage.JPG[/qimg]


OK OCTs, have fun explaining the physics of this one. To my eyes, it looks like the plane has half-entered the building. The right wing tip is showing, and the rest of the wing is already inside. But it looks like the steel beams have magically healed! The gaping plane-shaped hole doesn't appear until after the explosion.
Click to expand...

You mean the hole didn't get bigger until the massive explosion of thousands of gallons of jet fuel expanded it? I'm glad you're here to tell us these things!
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Here are 9 frames to study. Frame 6 is the same as the one frame I posted on the other thread. The two white puffy shapes in frame 6 are explosions, not the engines. There is plenty enough resolution to see the gash in the side of the building, if it were there during this time frame.

Look at this frame from a different video, showing the gash in WTC1. The towers are much farther away, so the resolution on them is far worse, yet you can clearly see the gash. You can even make out the pieces of aluminum cladding that were protruding. It is absurd to contend that the resolution in the above video is too poor to notice the huge plane-shaped hole.
Click to expand...

Instead of pointing out weird things, try piecing together a theory and come back with that. Shouldn't be too difficult.
 
TS1+2=4, why have you started another thread on a topic when you haven't answered any of the criticisms brought up in the first thread on this SAME topic?

Simple question - are you saying there wasn't really a plane?
 
For anyone that is interested, based on some rudimentary calculations, a single pixel in Troofer's image, at the Z-axis plane of the tower surface, is about 1.29 feet.

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
For anyone that is interested, based on some rudimentary calculations, a single pixel in Troofer's image, at the Z-axis plane of the tower surface, is about 1.29 feet.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

I'm interested. I can't believe you took the time to work that out though. :p
 
gumboot said:
For anyone that is interested, based on some rudimentary calculations, a single pixel in Troofer's image, at the Z-axis plane of the tower surface, is about 1.29 feet.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

How did you...

When was I born?

Have you heard about this million dollar challenge some guy has? You should think about trying out for it...
 
My god. Those 9 frames show the murder of hundreds of people and the subsequent death of hundreds/thousands more. You're watching a plane full of people who may well have known exactly what was happening to them, being slammed into a building of people who may or may not have entirely unaware of their fate.

And you're talking about plane shaped holes, like this is a cartoon or something?

Good god. There just aren't words.
 
Last edited:
You all are missing the most important piece of evidence of NWO conspiracy that this picture has to offer: the face of King Kong clearly visible in the smoke...
 

Attachments

  • NoDamageKong.jpg
    NoDamageKong.jpg
    35.6 KB · Views: 8
Quinn said:
You all are missing the most important piece of evidence of NWO conspiracy that this picture has to offer: the face of King Kong clearly visible in the smoke...
Click to expand...
I don't know if it's the hour, but that seriously made me laugh out loud.
 
Consternatio said:
My god. Those 9 frames show the murder of hundreds of people and the subsequent death of hundreds/thousands more. You're watching a plane full of people who may well have known exactly what was happening to them, being slammed into a building of people who may or may not have entirely unaware of their fate.

And you're talking about plane shaped holes, like this is a cartoon or something?

Good god. There just aren't words.
Click to expand...

Do you understand this TS ? Has this sunk into your head ?

This is not a ****ing cartoon, this is real world. This is a plane full of innocent people. They are being murdered in the most dreadful way possible. You are mocking them. Stop it.
 
Has the plane actually made contact with the tower in that image? To me it looks like it's a frame from just before impact because of the angle and poor resolution.
 
There are clouds of debris exploding from all impact areas. They are obsuring the gash. They are made of the same stuff as the building, therefore they are the same colour, therefore they are difficult to see in a crappy compressed video. But not impossible. I'm sure you know all this already 'truth'seeker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom