Wow. An actual answer.
Don't know, you are the expert in this field, so with time I would suspect you will figure it out if you search. But I assume you do know and admit that the PHI spiral is seen among either most or some galaxy spirals. true or false and do elaborate if you know or have an opinion. Thanks.
Yes, a small number of spiral galaxies do have spirals that correspond to the golden ratio, but most don't, barred spirals in particular. Ellipticals come in all shapes, from almost completely spherical to elongated triaxial, and dwarf irregulars come in all sorts of interesting unsymmetric shapes (hence the name - irregular). Ring galaxies are like spiral galaxies, in that they have flattened discs of stars, but these are concentrated in a ring (usually, but not always) elliptical, around the centre of the galaxy.
But then again, Wolley, you might look into nucleur physics and the atomic structure... for it parallels exactly the heavenly bodies. As above so below, size doesn;t matter for the ratios and pathways are what's important, and hence Wolley, you have a whole other area of study that might help you if you study atomic structure.
No it doesn't parrallel it exactly, as you would know if you knew anything about atomic structure. Electrons do not orbit in flat planes the way planets do. In fact they don't really orbit at all, check out quantum mechanics, specifically the electron orbital wave function.
And interestingly, the mass in outer space equals the mass in inner space. the amount of mass in let's say our Solar System or Maybe its in all the Universe matches exactly with the amount of mass in matter and the vacuum of space that exists around a nucleus. Space and distances and seem to only have so much mass they can support or balance.
No, the mass in outer space doesn't equal the mass in inner space. I think you probably mean that the relative densities are the same, but even that isn't accurate. Your own website says that the Universe is expanding (referring to the redshifts of galaxies) which means that the density of the Universe is constantly dropping, whilst atoms have constant density, they don't expand. The logical conclusion from this is that the densities aren't the same, or at least, if they ever were, they aren't now, or if they are now then they weren't in the past, and won't be in the future.
I can;t go much beyond that tid bit I researched long ago, but the microcosm is definitely matched by the macrocosm, or what you have truly found out Wolley will be parallled by micro-scientists.
No. Atoms do not arrange themselves in galaxies, but in a number of different ways. We'll start with three best known states of matter;
1. Solids - These come in different forms - crystalline solids, in which the atoms are arranged in repeating geometric patterns, metallic, which are crystalline, but in which electrons are freed from their atoms allowing electricity to be conducted (note, not all metals form metallic structure, and some non-metals do), and non-crystalline solids in which there is no repeating pattern.
2. Liquids - In a liquid the atoms are yightly packed, but free to move around each other, which they do in random directions, with no central concentration.
3. Gasses - Gasses are like liquids, except that the distances between atoms are much greater, hence why gasses are highly compressible while liquids are not. Try reading about Brownian motion. Nothing like the way stars or galaxies move.
There are, however, other ways in which matter can be organized. We'll start at the densest - Singularities. These are what are commonly referred to as Black Holes, and the matter in these is compressed into a dimensionless point, so dense that the laws of physics break down. Next we have neutron degeneracy, material so dense that the electrons are forced on to their nuclei, creating a semi-crystalline structure composed only of neutrons. Now we come to electron degenerate matter, less dense than neutron degenerate, but the atoms are so closely packed that the electrons are forced into a sort of "electron soup" which has weird quantum mechanically driven properties, the most obvious being that the volume and pressure of the material become independent of its temperature. Okay, out to the opposite extreme, on the far side of gasses we have plasmas, which are like gasses, but the atoms have such high energies that the outer electrons of the atoms are stripped away and are free to move around on their own. This gives the material the interesting property that it can conduct electricity. This is what you are seeing when you turn on a fluorescent tube, the gas in the tube is turned into a plasma.
I'm not even going to go into the theoretical states that could exists, such as quark soup.
None of the above are observed in large scale structures such as stellar systems or galaxies.
For readers. Wolley is most likely referring to this posting...
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/PhiSpiralofCreation.html
Thers a few more hypers I could refer to, but maybe later, as we await Wolleys response and answer..
That is precisely the page I was referring to.
