wollery
Protected by Samurai Hedgehogs!
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2003
- Messages
- 11,308
You really do have problems with reading comprehension don't you. I essentially said that I wasn't going to bother with you anymore because you're an idiot. You cherrypick your facts (and even then get them wrong), fiddle your maths, which you admit to, and ignore or dismiss all criticism of these totally antiscientific methods. You couldn't find a real corellation if it came up to you wearing a t-shirt that said "I am a corellation" and screaming "Get your corellations here!" at the top of its lungs. And even that's ignoring that fact that, as all good scientists know, corellation does not imply causation.Before you fled, Wolley on your trumpted up excuse of me not answering your bottom three repetitive paragraphs, this to excuse your lack of knowledge in BIOLOGY and CHEMISTRY.... I wrote you the following...
I know a lot of Biology, Chemistry, Geometry, Particle Physics, Mathematics and Logic. Certainly far more than you appear to. I also know that facts are facts, no matter how much you may wish them to be otherwise. I'm not afraid of facts, they are my stock in trade, and if they prove my personal beliefs to be wrong then I change my beliefs. You, on the other hand, change the facts to fit your personal beliefs.
Why are you so scared of actual facts, such as the real distance to the Moon, or the L1 Lagrangian? No you choose to stick with a 40 year old value that has been shown to be incorrect, because it suits your preconceptions better. If you had any guts or self respect you'd admit that you were wrong and seek actual values to work with, rather than the fantasies you currently use.
You're pathetic, and frankly not worth wasting any more time on.