kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
So nothing you say has any affect on what Sweaty presents here as evidence for BF that isn't paltry.
'I was told personally' and a similar mid-seventies description does not make it reliable evidence of sasquatch. If squirming with the definition of 'reliable evidence' is the best counter a proponent can provide than there is a serious problem with their position.I was told personally about the discovery of that 7-mile long double trackway north of Carson some 30 years after the event. Ed talked about it as though it had happened days before. I purchased a DVD of The Mysterious Monsters (the later version, not the Sunn picture I saw in Portland, Oregon, in a theater) in 2005, and there was Ed again, describing the event on film in the mid-seventies just about as he described it to me in front of the courthouse. Nothing wrong with his memory.
Why is it not easily attributable to something other than sasquatch? I would like to see reliable evidence as much as you, LAL.Under kitakaze's definition of reliable evidence, that double trackway would have to be deemed reliable evidence.
Trying to explain it away as hoaxers or jumping animals just doesn't cut it on something like that.
Is it anecdotal or reliable evidence?I'd heard about the DNR workers spotting a pair crossing a meadow some years later. It showed up on the BFRO site. So, what have we here? Mass hysteria for seven?
http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=1707