• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Missiles at Ground Zero

well, this unidentified male, who im sure is an expert in identifying missiles, was referring to what hit WTC1+2, not 7


The unidentified male was a reporter talking to CNN. Note several people thought they saw a missile in the area. There was no reference where the missile went. Please read the entier CNN transcript.
 
Flight 175: As the World Watched on Discovery Times is the program that shows the missile. It appears about 45 minuets into the program.
That video is posted in segments on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJKeCl_dIEo

Find the segment and tell us at what minute and second your missile appears.

I take it you have by now read the CNN transcript that tells of the witnesses.
I've done more than that: I've read over 14,000 pages of testimony from people who were right there. A few describe thinking that a missile hit the south tower. Zero describe thinking that a missile hit WTC 7.

Please report back with your video results. I'm sure we're all eager to see your missile.
 
Bolding mine.

MaGZ, isn't it possible that an event witnessed and experienced by thousands of people could generate some bizarre statements by people in a panic?

If you go around, find these statements, you can put together quite a fanciful hypothisis of what happened that day.

Taken together with all the other links I provided I think it is significant, especially seconds after the event.
 
The unidentified male was a reporter talking to CNN. Note several people thought they saw a missile in the area. There was no reference where the missile went. Please read the entier CNN transcript.

I like that CTers get their "news", from the Onion! I liked the Oliver Stone, single plane theory better, though.
 
A question for everyone.

What would the government do to protect national secrets in WTC 7?

According to one of your fellow troofers, the best thing to do is to offer the national secrets for sale on the open market. But -- and here's the fiendishly clever part -- you charge THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, so there's NO WAY anyone could afford to buy them!

BWAAAAHAHAHA!!!!
 
MaGZ said:
http://www.public-action.com/911/psyopnews/Extra/3/flash91.htm
Umm... According to those images, this alleged missile... missed the towers. This fanciful missile is also too high to strike WTC7, so what do they do? They will another missile into existence, coming from a different direction.
Did anyone click this link? It's the infamous paranormal hat! MaGZ, have you ever posted under the name of Carlos or latinjral?
 
Eyewitnesses seconds after the crash of flight 175 said they saw a missile(see CNN transcript)

So, 175 crashes.

Huge Explosion.

Hundreds (thousands?) of New Yorkers crane their heads skywards to see the source of the noise.

With all of these eyewitnesses, how many saw a missle again?
 
Did anyone click this link? It's the infamous paranormal hat! MaGZ, have you ever posted under the name of Carlos or latinjral?
Just clicked it. In the video, it's clearly in the foreground, and likely a bird.

I've only heard about the famous Carlos and latinjral. I hope this is a visitation!
 
Did anyone click this link? It's the infamous paranormal hat! MaGZ, have you ever posted under the name of Carlos or latinjral?

Just clicked it. In the video, it's clearly in the foreground, and likely a bird.

I've only heard about the famous Carlos and latinjral. I hope this is a visitation!
ive seen a good debunking of that where they took all the frames an dput it into one animated gif and you can clearly see the wings flapping, lol

i pointed this out to magz as SLCF, but apparently it didnt sink in
 
So, 175 crashes.

Huge Explosion.

Hundreds (thousands?) of New Yorkers crane their heads skywards to see the source of the noise.

With all of these eyewitnesses, how many saw a missle again?
Hundreds of thousands of people in New York and New Jersey were staring at that site at that moment. No missile. And none of the thousands of people in and around WTC 7 reported any such thing. Perhaps we'll here MaGZ's theory of mass hypnosis next.

First, though, I want to see that video. It must be compelling, to have made such an impression on our young visitor.
 
wow, look at us..falling into yet another woo conspiracy thread like sheep

couldn't you guys smell the troll stench from about page 2 of this thread?
 
MaGZ is certainly different from the regular Troothers who stop by here. He acknowledges that planes hit the towers, that this and the fires resulted in their collapses, and that WTC7 was damaged hours before it collapsed. He seems to disagree on only one point - whether missiles missed Flight 175 and hit WTC7 (and a parking lot). In the overall scheme of things, that's a fairly minor point, comparatively. Also, he seems to be able to string words together into comprehensible English.

Compared to Killtown, PDoh, TS1234, TC329, etc., he's a breath of fresh air!
 
Hundreds of thousands of people in New York and New Jersey were staring at that site at that moment. No missile. And none of the thousands of people in and around WTC 7 reported any such thing. Perhaps we'll here MaGZ's theory of mass hypnosis next.

Exactly.

He questions our critical thinking, yet he fails to think where all eyes would be pointed at the exact moment he claims a missle was spotted.
 
MaGZ is certainly different from the regular Troothers who stop by here. He acknowledges that planes hit the towers, that this and the fires resulted in their collapses, and that WTC7 was damaged hours before it collapsed. He seems to disagree on only one point - whether missiles missed Flight 175 and hit WTC7 (and a parking lot). In the overall scheme of things, that's a fairly minor point, comparatively. Also, he seems to be able to string words together into comprehensible English.

Compared to Killtown, PDoh, TS1234, TC329, etc., he's a breath of fresh air!
By the way, that parking lot can clearly be seen after the plane impacts in the video 9/11: What We Saw. There is nothing out of the ordinary there. I've posted quotes here from people who described the fires in that lot after the collapses.
 
Wildcat,
So on 9/11, NORAD was just waiting around to get the orders. They were just following protocol and could not act on their own in an emergency situation.

Do you really believe that?
Heeeeyyy... Aren't you the one here claiming that these alleged fighter pilots each fired a missile at one of the planes, because they were allegedly given orders?

Then, when the missiles missed, neither of them said anything to anyone, because, I assume, they must've been given orders to keep silent?

Do you really believe that?
 
Flight 175: As the World Watched on Discovery Times is the program that shows the missile. It appears about 45 minuets into the program.

I take it you have by now read the CNN transcript that tells of the witnesses.



MaGZ. Just stop and think for a moment. UA175's final moments are the most documented unforseen event in human history. Do you honestly expect us to believe we all failed to notice an important aspect of that moment?

I have personally seen more images and videos of that impact than I can bear to keep track of. I have not once, ever, seen a missile. How do you explain that?

-Gumboot
 
stateofgrace,

The missile hit WTC 7 one or two seconds after the crash of flight 175. I saw the video taken by the local FOX TV cameraman. It was shown every where after 9/11 but is rarely seen today.
OK, see... here's what you're not understanding. If it was a missile, visible, and traveling along the path it must be, then it would be captured on all of the videos taken of the towers that day...

But why is it only on one video?

Edit: For example... Where are the missiles in this video? Or this one (at the 00:19 mark)? If there's even a single missile, it should be in all decent shots of the second impact, not just one or two. Why is this not the case?
 
Last edited:
Just looked at Part 4 of As the World Watched.

At 4:03, plane strikes South Tower, and a piece of debris shoots out trailing smoke. MaGZ's missile?

At 4:10, black object shoots across display. (probably bird, but could be MaGZ's missile?)

Speaking of how witnesses can get things wrong, at 4:50 an observer who is watching the towers, sees the South Tower explode and says 'I did not see a plane go in. That exploded'.
 
MaGZ is certainly different from the regular Troothers who stop by here. He acknowledges that planes hit the towers, that this and the fires resulted in their collapses, and that WTC7 was damaged hours before it collapsed. He seems to disagree on only one point - whether missiles missed Flight 175 and hit WTC7 (and a parking lot). In the overall scheme of things, that's a fairly minor point, comparatively. Also, he seems to be able to string words together into comprehensible English.

Compared to Killtown, PDoh, TS1234, TC329, etc., he's a breath of fresh air!

I think this is an important point. Despite the fact that MaGZ is quite obviously barking mad, what he's presented here is infinitely more plausible than the usual CT fodder. No Star Wars beams, no robot-controlled planes, no "pods," no million charges of C4 blended in with nonexistent concrete.

By the standards of the typical Denier, MaGZ would be laughed off their boards as a "shill." Tells you something about them, doesn't it? Puts their madness into perspective?

Also, thanks to maccy for finding the origin of this article. I'd never heard of the "National Vanguard" before. I confess to taking a guilty pleasure every time a racial supremacist group demonstrates, quite succinctly, the potential dangers of limiting one's gene pool...
 

Back
Top Bottom