Booted from the Infowars.com Chatroom

[apathoid]

I'm almost inclined to join LC just to get banned...I hate being left out of the party

Thats like being a Catholic and not being baptized. Getting banned from LC is a rite of passage for us JREFers. Be a good JREFer and go to LC, get banned and get your badge. It can all be done in a single day and you'll be changed forever

 

[T.A.M.]

I wouldnt be surprised if I went to join under the name TAM, that it would say "That name is not permitted on the LC Forum"...lol

TAM

 

[The Silver Shadow]

Has anyone else on this forum had to deal with such incidents of being booted or banned from a 9/11 conspiracy website?

I was banned from the LC forums after debating Killtard and saying that his comparison of Flight 93's crash to the Lockerbie bombing is flawed. Dylan claimed that I was "being childish"...

 

[LashL]

Infowars...chatroom.
Those two words together...*shudder*

Exactly what I was thinking! I didn't even know that they had a chatroom (thankful for small kindnesses).

 

[LashL]

I'm almost inclined to join LC just to get banned...I hate being left out of the party

You know, I had been there for several months on the old board before the ugly meltdown in the wake of the power struggle between Russell Pickering and the other moderators and admins. And I had been there under the same name since October when the new board started, and never got banned until about a week ago when I wrote a polite post on the thread that Do-Over started in which he lied about others not donating money in support of the 9/11 charities, etc.

What I wrote was something to the effect that I had read in news articles that Universal Studios had, in fact, made donations in keeping with their pledges and asked whether he was saying that was not true. Instant banning and my post went down the rabbit-hole (though I did get a screen capture first).

Just goes to show you...

 

[anticonspiracy911]

Oliver is likely busy making you a badge now as we speak...lol

Welcome to the Forum AC911. I get your point. It isnt a violation of the first ammendment, technically, but it does show the hypocracy that underlies their movement, given one of the mantras AJ spues concerns the loss of Constitutional Freedoms that the USA Citizens are losing through the new Police State.

TAM

I feel worthy of a badge, but that's up to Oliver haha.

 

[ConspiRaider]

I'm almost inclined to join LC just to get banned...I hate being left out of the party

I hear ya, Dave. But I just can't bring myself to spend even a minute of my valuable time trying to gain access to a message board run by clueless college kiddies.

Somehow I'll swallow my disappointment at remaining essentially badgeless.

 

[ConspiRaider]

I feel worthy of a badge, but that's up to Oliver haha.

Hell, I feel like Red Buttons griping at the Celebrity Roasts because he never got a dinner.

Oh yea, in spite of the stark whiteness of my beckoning Apartment Badge Wall - its forlorn emptiness and desolate nothingness, yawning in featureless and excruciating sameness across the hollow echoes of screaming unbroken oblivion:

I still support a Badge for your Courageous Infowarring Ways.

(Oliver, are you listening?)

Badge him!

Badge him!

Badge him!

Badge him!

 

[T.A.M.]

given it was inforwars.com you were banned from, maybe oliver should design a MEDAL or STRIPES for you instead of a badge...lol

TAM

 

[LashL]

Somehow I'll swallow my disappointment at remaining essentially badgeless.

Oh, no - you aren't badgeless, ConspiRaider. I think I offered to share THIS one with you back when neither of us could get on a certain ignore list (and if I didn't then, I'm offering now)

 

[ConspiRaider]

Oh, no - you aren't badgeless, ConspiRaider. I think I offered to share THIS one with you back when neither of us could get on a certain ignore list (and if I didn't then, I'm offering now)

I appreciate it LashL, you know I do, yer terrific and all. Yet, that Badge is enshrined - glittering, sparkling, dazzling, breathtaking in its gleaming beauty - on the wall of YOUR lovely home and not mine. I mean you deserve it and all, don't get me wrong, but...

Well, it's kind of like the Red Buttons at the Celebrity Roast Dinners where they wouldn't give him one.

Now if someone got a Dinner, and from that Dinner graciously let Red have one of her veal cutlets and some snow peas from her extra large helping - would Red have been satisfied? Should he have been? He'd have been appreciative and all, but still...

 

[Mince]

Is that the best they can do?

No. It is the only they can do.

 

[T.A.M.]

AC911:

I am no Ollie, but I felt you deserved something...and oh well I had the time.



TAM

 

[anticonspiracy911]

Thank you Tam . I will wear that badge with honor haha.

 

[PerryLogan]

Pseudo-woowoo

Clearly, we're missing the real challenge of the Loose Change Forum, which is not to get banned. Someone should see how long they can stay there, making comments, and not get thrown out.

I'll admit I'm not exactly sure how anyone would do this. You'd have to pose as a sort of pseudo-woowoo, inserting subtle wedges in their little brains.

 

[NeoRicen]

Um, the first amendment has nothing to do with privately run chatrooms. They are well within their "rights" to ban anyone they want for any reason whatsoever. It may be hypocritical, but it's not a violation of the 1st amendment.

But welcome anyway.

While that's true you'd expect that a group so aggressively claiming their defence of the 1st Amendment would uphold those same values in their organisation.

 

[The Doc]

While that's true you'd expect that a group so aggressively claiming their defence of the 1st Amendment would uphold those same values in their organisation.

Exactly. Nice post Neo.

I find that all of the conspiracy folks *cough*LOOSE CHANGE FORUMS*cough* tend to do this.

 

[NeoRicen]

I should say:

While that's true you'd expect that a group so aggressively claiming their defence of the 1st Amendment would uphold those same values in their organisation unless that organisation is InfoWars.

 

[The Doc]

I should say:

While that's true you'd expect that a group so aggressively claiming their defence of the 1st Amendment would uphold those same values in their organisation unless that organisation is InfoWars.

Or the Loose Change Forums

By the way, NeoRicen is my brother (literally). So Mods, if it seems like I'm posting to myself (IP - same WiFi network), I'm not lol.

 

[T.A.M.]

Clearly, we're missing the real challenge of the Loose Change Forum, which is not to get banned. Someone should see how long they can stay there, making comments, and not get thrown out.

I'll admit I'm not exactly sure how anyone would do this. You'd have to pose as a sort of pseudo-woowoo, inserting subtle wedges in their little brains.

Good point Perry. Maybe we could award belts (Ninja belts).

yellow belt - lasted 2 days at LC
green belt - lasted 4 days at LC
orange belt - lasted 1 week at LC
blue belt - lasted 2 week at LC
brown belt - lasted 1 month at LC
black belt - lasted 2 months or more at LC

Of course, the rules would dictate that you must not pass yourself off as a truther, but must act as you usually would, making the same arguments you make here...we'll be watching.

TAM