• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Sean Manchester - Vampire Hunter

What's good for the goose is good for the gander

brodski said:
How about attacking him because HE THINKS HE FIGHTS VAMPIERS?
Debunking him seems a reasonable activity for those engaged in skeptical activism.
Click to expand...

How about attacking Farrant because HE THINKS HE HAS RAISED THE DEMON PAN?

(And also a vampire during an occult ceremony as claimed by Farrant while under oath in the High Court during a libel trial).
 
Myth Buster said:
How about attacking Farrant because HE THINKS HE HAS RAISED THE DEMON PAN?

(And also a vampire during an occult ceremony as claimed by Farrant while under oath in the High Court during a libel trial).
Click to expand...

Hey, we've only got so much time. Maybe we'll get onto him once we've finished with this nutter.
 
Connected or not?

Darat said:
Will you answer my rather simple question or not? Thanks - so just to make it clear you have no connection to Sean Manchester?
Click to expand...

I am no more connected to Sean Manchester than "The Vampire" is connected to David Farrant.

Catherine and Barbara are closely connected to Farrant and represent his antipathy toward Manchester on this forum. Catherine, of course, is Farrant's girlfiend.
 
Hi--I have the picture somewhere also--one of this "three residences"--can't have a house like everyone else!!!! Also he has three cars for his ministry--one for emergencies??? one for "rough terrain"(round Bournemouth?) and one for "family use".

A bit extravagant surely?

He has no verification for holy orders bit if he was not making such a fuss no one would be bothered enough to look or care. As it is the Ad Clerum whatsit verified him, but then the Independent Church backed off, leaving the Utretch branch of England on its own that has nothing to do with the real Utretch branch in Holland.
As Manchester has his own"autocepahlous"--ie independent church it matters not a fig whether anyone verifies him or not. He was consecrated by an Illtid Thomas who no-one recognises either. The Roman Catholic Church does not recognise him and I cant imagine why he needs them to recognise his dickipoggy hillbilly church anyway as he claims to be a lapsed Catholic, so it is neither here nor there whether they say he is real or unreal.

So all he has to "verify" him is a dead Cardinal and the branch of the Old Catholic Church in England which may or may be not be valid itself.

barbara
 
Myth Buster said:
How about attacking Farrant because HE THINKS HE HAS RAISED THE DEMON PAN?

(And also a vampire during an occult ceremony as claimed by Farrant while under oath in the High Court during a libel trial).
Click to expand...

Well if that is the case then he sounds to be another person like Sean Manchester i.e. someone who cannot distinguish between what is real and what is their personal fantasy world.

However this thread is titled "Sean Manchester - Vampire Hunter" which is why it is probably more focused on Sean Manchester then someone else. Your question is really like saying "why aren't you attacking Genghis Khan in this thread as well?" it's just not germane to the topic.

Oh and will you answer my question or not?

Thanks - so just to make it clear you have no connection to Sean Manchester?
 
Last edited:
Myth Buster said:
I am no more connected to Sean Manchester than "The Vampire" is connected to David Farrant.

Catherine and Barbara are closely connected to Farrant and represent his antipathy toward Manchester on this forum. Catherine, of course, is Farrant's girlfiend.
Click to expand...

Thanks but you haven't answered my question, to make it clear you have no connection to Sean Manchester?
 
Spurious evidence with a single source

Darat said:
However this thread is titled about "Sean Manchester - Vampire Hunter" which is why it is probably more focused on Sean Manchester then someone else. Your question is really like saying "why aren't you attacking Genghis Khan in this thread as well?" it's just not germane to the topic.
Click to expand...

Farrant is relevant because 99.9% of the misinformation being posted on this forum about Manchester originates with Farrant and nobody else, even though it arrives indirectly through various members, not least those two who are very closely connected to him.

I have been in touch with both sides, as previously stated. If that means I have a connection, then I do. But I do not represent either side and would be more impartial but for the fact that this has turned into a kangaroo court with spurious evidence originating from someone who is every bit as unacceptable to you as Manchester. This I find to be illogical and unreasonable.
 
Myth Buster said:
How about attacking Farrant because HE THINKS HE HAS RAISED THE DEMON PAN?

(And also a vampire during an occult ceremony as claimed by Farrant while under oath in the High Court during a libel trial).
Click to expand...

As I said before, I think both of them are delusional. However it's only Manchester (and his fans) who seem to object to open discussion of these subjects, so poking fun at the Right Reverend Sean Hellsing makes me feel like a naughty schoolchild, and also kind of tingly.
But raising pan, that is a good one, and confusing Greek bestiality inspired Mythology with Christian Sadomasochistic Mythology, that's pretty funny.
But still not quite as distasteful, yet oddly humorous as believing in real "live" vampires. And especially in Kirklees. I have visions of Compo et al on a vampire hunt, trying to work out if Nora batty is one of the undead. There's probably a bit where they had to escape from Countess Norma by rolling down the moor-side in a specially converted bathtub.

Oh and as for harassing someone via their blog because their name is Dracul.a backwards. That's just priceless. How stupid do these people think that the Wampyr is?
 
Myth Buster said:
I have been in touch with both sides
Click to expand...
Myth. I think you are Sean Manchester. I have no proof but it is just an opinion. You are free to tell me I am wrong.



BTW. If you are wondering why people are asking. Well most people are asking because if you are Sean they have some questions for you. Darat on the other hand is asking because he wants to know if the JREF hold the correct information about who you are in case of any legal action arising from your or Myth Busters activities.

You should have provided your real name when registering. If you didn't I am sure Darat would be happy with a p.m. apology as long as you now provided your real name to him.
 
Paedophile priests etc

Lothian said:
What is a dickipoggy church?

Does bonkers Manchester cause more harm that the bonking bishops and paedophile priests in your own church?
Click to expand...


Precisely!

Look to the plank in your own eye, Catherine and Barbara, rather than the mote in others.
 
Myth Buster said:
...snip...
If that means I have a connection, then I do.

...snip..
Click to expand...

Again let me clarify this so I don't make any false assumptions:

Is it

1) The only connection you have had with Sean Manchester is via emails since the subject was raised on this Forum?
2) You were in contact with Sean Manchester via emails prior to him coming up on this Forum and your joining and posting here?

Can you just also confirm that you do not know Sean Manchester personally? For example he is not a friend, a business colleague, your employer, partner or something similar?

The reason I am asking is that your grasp of the detail of this matter seems incredible for someone not connected with either side.
 
For MythBuster

Myth Buster said:
I do not believe in attacking anyone on the say-so of a couple of vitriolic females waging a hate campaign.
Click to expand...

Well if MythBuster is first saying that Barbara and myself had no contact with Manchester aka MythBuster then he is saying that I was crap on the internet which is utter ludicrous considering the amount of official qualifications I have such as C.L.A.I.T and others. I also have my RSA typing upto stage 3 which is the highest you can get in the Uk. On another note if Manchester thought that I was crap then why did he use my home address and private email address on his letter headed paper of which I still have a copy of. Also it was myself who started Manchester's groups, it was myself who spent ages promoting these, it was myself who got Manchester on the net anyway. So what if he did have a website, it doesn't prove that Manchester designed it. He seems to be conveniently forgetting this. I wasn't crap at the time when he was just using me to do his dirty work.

For MythBuster for your information it was not Barbara or myself who started this 'hate campaign' if that is what you want to call it. We just joined in the fun.

David has also asked me to state that with regards to the retreat centre, David has several print outs from the internet where he's advertised it as a rehab centre and a rescue place from those who have been influenced by Cults and Satanists and I remember Manchester telling me this ages ago. So he can hardly pretend now that it's merely his domestic residence.

Mr. Manchester knew my private mobile number and also my home address as he knows about everyone elses as I used to write to him indeed I even asked if I could telephone him but the funny part is, is that Manchester always said that he had his telephone hooked up to the Police Station in Bournemouth and that his calls were always recorded. So they wouldn't have been private telephone calls. How ridiculous is that.

I don't believe in any Fantasy figures unless you class Manchester as one no. I don't believe that God is Fantasy either but that is for another thread and another discussion.

Catherine Fearnley
 
Myth of Alucard exploded

brodski said:
But raising pan, that is a good one, and confusing Greek bestiality inspired Mythology with Christian Sadomasochistic Mythology, that's pretty funny. But still not quite as distasteful, yet oddly humorous as believing in real "live" vampires.

Oh and as for harassing someone via their blog because their name is Dracul.a backwards. That's just priceless. How stupid do these people think that the Wampyr is?
Click to expand...

David Farrant has hunted vampires and, when that failed to gain him the attention he craved, attempted to raise them in occult ceremonies involving naked females splattered with blood cavorting over graves in Highgate Cemetery. Is that distasteful enough for you?

Sean Manchester has been maliciously harassed by someone called Alex Lucard and the evidence is there for all to see. Where is the evidence (apart from someone who is waging a vendetta alleging it to be so) that Sean Manchester has ever harassed Alex Lucard?
 
The devil is in the detail

Darat said:
The reason I am asking is that your grasp of the detail of this matter seems incredible for someone not connected with either side.
Click to expand...

I was investigating the situation long before the thread on this forum and have had email and snail mail communication with various people from both sides, but not the main protagonists.

If you knew where my field of expertise lay you would better understand why my apparent grasp of the detail seems incredible. But that is privileged information.
 
Myth Buster said:
Sean Manchester has been maliciously harassed by someone called Alex Lucard
Click to expand...
But of course you're not involved and aren't taking sides. :catfight:


Oh yes, please show us the evidence that Lucard maliciously harassed bishop van Helsing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom