Dylan gets a letter from a '9/11 victim'

It's amazing how quickly they turn it into ad hominem into gravy. Does he work the government? The military? Is he a mason?

Then they start insisting you change the subject... WTC7! WTC7! WTC7! ... in a thread about flight 77, Gravy asks about flight 77, and they all instantly spring into action none of them able to stay on topic.

Disorganized thought is one of the symptoms of schizophrenia.
 
Gravy, this is a question I've been meaning to ask, and this seems as on-topic as it's going to get so.... do you get real-life harassed by these people at all? Do you get random phone-calls or anything? Have any of them tried to get your personal information? Have any of them abused it?
 
chippy said:
Haha, indeed. I wrote about that here:

http://911debunker.livejournal.com/3673.html
Click to expand...

Five missile batteries on the roof, huh? I have a source of my own that analyzes Meyssan's assertion that missile batteries exist at the Pentagon, a very useful source that I encourage you to read:

http://www.jod911.com/There_Are_No_Missile_Defenses_at_the_Pentagon.pdf
Click to expand...

I also highly recommend you read that paper. The author is a genius. And quite good looking I hear... :D
 
Who or what is the "death threat against a Truther" they´re
talking about? I remember the rude comments against Sam
Danner, but the guy who behaved this way, was pretty fast
banned after warnings and for "threatening other members".
Must be before my time here.

Also - there´s nothing to win if we at this CT-Subforum fight
personal instead factual debates. I´m pretty sure that Dylan
does not know what happened to any of the Passengers and
Gravy should know this, too.

Personally i highly appreciate the dialogue between both sides
and starting problems are pretty usual, but Gravy and Dylan
could be more diplomatic in my opinion - representing both
oppositions, even if Gravy has no influence in here at all -
beside respect from the pretty neutral and fairadministration
of this CT-subforum.
 
I love reading these kinda things. Hilarious. I love not being a CTist now.
 
I love the post where they ignore the comment on firemen testifying to seeing a large hole in the side of WTC7. They conveniently pull out firemen testimony for the "only small fragements were left. No phones, No computers...." and use it as gospel, but when you show them firemen testimony on the condition of WTC7, all they can say is "No Photo - No evidence". Pitiful, small minded little creatures...

TAM
 
Notice how the LC thread was about Flight 77 and when Mark shows up all of a sudden the twoofers have an urge to talk about WTC7.


Remember, LC kids: you musn't stay on one topic for too long; after a while you start to get pinned down - so always remember the change the topic and start fresh!
 
T.A.M. said:
I love the post where they ignore the comment on firemen testifying to seeing a large hole in the side of WTC7. They conveniently pull out firemen testimony for the "only small fragements were left. No phones, No computers...." and use it as gospel, but when you show them firemen testimony on the condition of WTC7, all they can say is "No Photo - No evidence". Pitiful, small minded little creatures...

TAM
Click to expand...

What annoys me is how they keep asking for photos they have to know don't exist. What do they expect, we'll finally break down, and say, "Okay, you win, here's all the photos we've been hiding from you!"?

We should start asking for photos of the guys planting explosives. "They must exist, how else could the NWO monitor their progress? What, you expect them to trust their minions? Have you ever met a minion? They're total weasels!"
 
I haven't read the LC forums in a few months.

I didn't think it possible, but from what I read just now I think they're even dumber than they used to be.
 
jaydeehess said:
How does one go about getting unbanned?
For that matter how does one go about finding out why one was banned in the first place?
Click to expand...

There is no way to learn why someone was banned if
personal emotions instead fair justice are involved.
That´s why you will never see a "Banning-Board" over
there - and to be honest, it wouldn´t sound very cool:

JREF´er 1 was banned because ... just because.
JREF´er 2 was banned because i had a bad day.
JREF´er 3 may be no JREF´er but he didn´t agree
with me just like the JREF´ers... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Claim: Passenger Jets hit WTCs
Evidence: Forensic Pathology IDing persons on board. Video Footage of impacts. Airline Manifests. Plane Debris at GZ

Claim: Explosives used in CD of WTCs
Evidence: Sulfur...Sulfur...Sulfur

Claim: Flight 93 Went down in Shanksville after people on board faught with Hijackers.
Evidence: ATC Tapes. Cockpit Voice Recordings. Crash site debris. Crash site human remains with forensic confirmation of persons.

Claim: Flight 93 landed in Cleveland.
Evidence:...,...,...

Shall I go on.

TAM
 
Oliver said:
Also - there´s nothing to win if we at this CT-Subforum fight
personal instead factual debates. I´m pretty sure that Dylan
does not know what happened to any of the Passengers and
Gravy should know this, too.
Click to expand...
I don't know that. That's why I asked. After their Washington, D.C. trip they apparently decided that – lo and behold! – a plane hit the Pentagon! I asked if he believes that plane was flight 77. A fair question, IMO, especially in light of him touting a letter from a relative of a flight 77 victim.
 
Anti-sophist said:
Gravy, this is a question I've been meaning to ask, and this seems as on-topic as it's going to get so.... do you get real-life harassed by these people at all? Do you get random phone-calls or anything? Have any of them tried to get your personal information? Have any of them abused it?
Click to expand...
No, I don't give them my personal information. I've had some internet death threats, but that's it. The deniers at Ground Zero aren't threatening types. I'm also the size of a NFL linebacker.
 
Gravy said:
I don't know that. That's why I asked. After their Washington, D.C. trip they apparently decided that – lo and behold! – a plane hit the Pentagon! I asked if he believes that plane was flight 77. A fair question, IMO, especially in light of him touting a letter from a relative of a flight 77 victim.
Click to expand...

Well, he´s still a pretty young man and also pretty "waywardly"
concerning his board-rules. Personally i don´t think it matters what
he believes concerning the passangers, but it would matter if he
would close his mind about JREF-(CT FORUM) / Skeptics in general.
And you seem to be a representative for all Skeptics for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom