Dylan gets a letter from a '9/11 victim'

Is Dylan dumb or just in it for the money?

Why does he fail to say it again, or prove he said he retracted his lies. He is playing the part, he can not tell the truth it will let the fraud of LC out of the bag.

There is not a single thing in LC true to prove CT. If my brother was on 77 I would have Dylan's money now; even if I had to go to law school and do it myself. We need to tell the survivors these guys are a fraud so they can get the LC from LC.

There has to be some civil line they crossed. Where is that internet lawyer who was taking on fraud. LC is very close to fraud. Money for lies.
 
I even signed up to the LC forum just to ask Dylan to answer Gravy's question.

The "Dylan Avery" Argument:
"All you ever do is straw man and make fun of me!".

The funny thing is - we're trying to debate facts but all that we get in response is the above

Irony:
I love the Irony here.

Gravy Posted:
My question remains: do you believe that the relatives of the letter's author died when flight 77 hit the Pentagon?
And the last part of the response from Dylan Avery after failing to answer any of Gravy's questions.

Posted By dylan avery
Why are you not answering Quest's question?
Irony :)
 
It's amazing how quickly they turn it into ad hominem into gravy. Does he work the government? The military? Is he a mason?

Then they start insisting you change the subject... WTC7! WTC7! WTC7! ... in a thread about flight 77, Gravy asks about flight 77, and they all instantly spring into action none of them able to stay on topic.

Disorganized thought is one of the symptoms of schizophrenia.

Two sevens bad, one 7 good? What a bunch of retards! I have alot of free time, after summer. I'm gonna do a flick, about these nutters, me thinks! I'll get Emilio however, much cooler of a kat, not a drug addict, etc...
 
From always trip'n, cause all I do is Look-up...
If you take a close look (well not that close) at the photo provided by Gavy, you'll see that the plane supposedly left bodies in an angular fashion, rather than straight on... so how do you explain the fact that bodies were strewn over the building at an angle, while the hole punched out of one of the inner rings is a relatively perfect circle, indicating that it was hit straight on?

Briiiiiliant...
You "really" can't make this s*%t up!

Yet more,
You see, if you can prove that WTC7 was a C.D., which we have, then you can prove that Osama Bin Freaking-Laden didn't do it. Simple. If you want to accuse him of doing WTC7, then YOU have the burden of proof. If we want to point to particular individuals, then we have that burden. But if we want to say, "Inside Job" and there is no conceivable way that an "outsider" could have done it, then yes it is quite accurate.

Koo Koo!

i, edit for jref, by me.
 
Last edited:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2287&st=0&#entry10997228

'These people are screaming for a new investigation, and you all laugh and call them "troofers".'
-Dylan

The letter he claims is from the family of 2 victims from flight 77...a flight Dylan and the rest claim didn't crash at all.


Thoughts?

My thoughts: Why is it that Do-Over, who claims to have received "hundreds" of letters from family members of victims, never posted one until today? And why post it at all in a thread designed as a dig at Gravy? If the victims' family members were important to Do-Over, why does he post it in such a disrespectful manner and then abandon the thread topic rather than posting it in a respectful fashion?

It just seems so wrong on so many levels for him to post it in the manner he did.

The letter may be legitimate, of course. The problem is that it is difficult to believe anything that comes out of the mouths of the likes of the guys who created that piece of crap video, LC, which Do-Over admitted is crap during the debate with Gravy on Hardfire. Especially when he posts it on the internet in a fashion that is designed to start a fight rather than to show respect to the person who is purported to have written it.

I don't doubt that there may be a few family members of victims who buy into the LC nonsense and conspiracy theories, just as there are a few people among various other groups of people who buy into woo for various reasons. I feel sorry for them if they have been fooled by Do-Over and Company because they do not realize that Do-Over and Company don't give a flying (rule8) about them, that Do-Over and Company have disparaged them repeatedly, accused them of complicity no less, and will disparage them again in the future if they see a percentage in it.

I also wonder if Do-Over sought the permission of the letter writer to post the letter on the internet in such a disrespectful fashion, but I think I already know the answer to that.
 
Last edited:
It's amazing how quickly they turn it into ad hominem into gravy. Does he work the government? The military? Is he a mason?

Then they start insisting you change the subject... WTC7! WTC7! WTC7! ... in a thread about flight 77, Gravy asks about flight 77, and they all instantly spring into action none of them able to stay on topic.

Disorganized thought is one of the symptoms of schizophrenia.

My thoughts almost exactly. Well said, IMHO.

When The Quest kept butting in, I kept saying/thinking "WTF?" and "F Off!" How rude and psychotic can you get? Does he expect Mark to download his brain so that The Quest can rid himself of the paranoia and delusions that must plague all LCers?

What annoys me is how they keep asking for photos they have to know don't exist. What do they expect, we'll finally break down, and say, "Okay, you win, here's all the photos we've been hiding from you!"?

We should start asking for photos of the guys planting explosives. "They must exist, how else could the NWO monitor their progress? What, you expect them to trust their minions? Have you ever met a minion? They're total weasels!"

Hehehe. :) Yep. They keep asking for videos of the plane at the pentagon. Well, where's the video of the missile?

Wow, a forum of the elite 9/11 truthseekers who support Loose Change, and apparently they haven't even looked at the evidence from the Moussoaui trial.

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200318.html

Yep. It's pretty unbelievable isn't it (not taking into account the delusions and disordered thoughts)?

I have downloaded that three times and I keep getting a corrupt archive. Anybody have a good copy I can get?

It works for me. What browser are you using?

Regarding the Falkenberg family member's letter to Dylan. The "Truthers" will gladly admit that they have been vocal regarding the events of 9/11, so it is not surprising that victims' relations have been affected by their message, such as it is.

I am saddened, but not surprised that a few people such as the author of Dylan's letter have apparently supported the "Truther" viewpoint. One of the saddest things is that the "Truthers" have no consistent theory as to what really happened at all, and their message of "ask questions" leads nowhere. Where is their explanation of events from the "inside job" viewpoint?

JohnDoeX admitted at his forum he doesn't know what hit the Pentagon.
Was It A Boeing 757 That Hit The Pentagon?, Vote now.
http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=2358
His post:

[shrugging smilie]
but i assure you.. we are trying to find out.. [winking smilie]

The saddest part about all this is that victims' family members are having their world torn apart yet again by the shallow promises of the "Truthers".
 

Back
Top Bottom