• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

No actually...me taking time out of my life to try and get justice for the victims of 9/11 equals caring. (Justice will only come when America has united as a whole. I as one person cannot bring justice for the victims) However, posting pictures of cats in a thread like this is equal to pissing on the graves of those who died on 9/11.

This is a serious subject matter...and some of you are completely disgracing the memory of those who died...by spamming this thread with inane junk. Show some class how about it.
Enough is enough. You have come to a forum for skeptics, critical thinkers, debunkers, and scientific process with your posts. You have been posting here for a number of months. It is time for you to make a decision.

If you truly believe that the events, as described by the 9/11 Commission repoirt and other official sources, to be incorrect (either intentionally, or by error), then get your act together. On these forums you have been provided with ample information on how to investigate, gather evidence, corraborate evidence, and present it in a scientifically, and logically, valid manner. Use these tools to put together a case that holds up to scrutiny.

If, on the other hand, you put together these theories because you are bored, dislike the current administration, enjoy mental masturbation, or other reasons; then shut up.

Regardless of which of the above is true (you believe exactly what you state, or not) you actions are an insult to people who died on that day, and those that have died since then in taking action to try to ensure the safety of the US and its allies. You slander and libel against people. If your theories are correct you do a disservice by failing to present them in a manner that can truly bring injustice to light; and if your theories are incorrect, you are spreading disinformation.

In short, put up or shut up. Either make a coherent; scientifically and logically valid, argument or go chase UFOs, bigfoot, or some other bogeyman.

-AW
 
I think this bears repeating...
such as claiming the word "progress" is unique to and indicative of a single mode of collapse

"NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers..." NIST FAQ 2

"Video evidence also showed unambiguously that the collapse progressed from the top to the bottom..." NIST FAQ 2

other callapses i suppose will regress, digress, ingress or egress, but certainly not progress
 
I found something else that is glowing orange, like the blaze of a fire....

istockphoto_1250080_orange_and_yellow_ice_lolly.jpg


But considering it's made of ice, I don't think it will actually be burning.

...call me crazy... :rolleyes:
 
I'm gonna have to say "Thanks!" here to 28thKingdom. If I ever was engaged in any sort of doubt about the official story, he has done *everything* necessary to remove that doubt...

...Thanks again skeptics, thanks for your respect for the victims and for the truth. That's why I signed up here and that's why I stay. Keep on educating. :)


Its posts like this that convince me it is worth the efforts hammering my head against CT concrete core skulls until my brains are a mushy pulp.

:)

It's nice to know there are sane people out there taking all this in.

-Gumboot
 
Wow. I take a weekend off, and this thread goes nuts. We should rename this part of the forums "Paranoid Fantasies" just for Macaroon and Christophera! What's with these two? "If I say the same thing over and over again, click my heels three times, and wish real hard, I'll get a pony!"

I'm going to go find another troll to play with. Maybe one with some actual intellect to make it at least a challenge.
 
Because folks like you don't seem to realize that nobody's mind is going to change, and just keep picking at the idiot scabs so we can't heal...:

Interesting assertion.

I used to be a believer, before. Now I'm an atheist. There's a number of things I believed and changed my mind because I was given enough information to do so, sometimes on this very forum.

If it's impossible to change someone's mind, then we're all wasting our time, here, and Randi should close the website entirely.

Otherwise, I think we should each stick to the debates we care about and to which we can contribute. The rest, we leave to other people.

But please, oh, please: no cats.
 
Boloboffin
The signficance of OPERATION NORTHWOOD, is not that it details 9/11 precisely but that the government wanted to cause terrorism in the states so that it may get support to invade Cuba. Similarly 9/11 had the same effect. It gave president Bush carte-blanche to invade which ever country he deemed necessary. Whichever group designed 9/11 used the fact that there are real arab terrorist and interwined that with their own plans. The suspected that the general public will know no difference.
Outline in OPERATION NORTHWOOD was a drone plane that was suppose to be detonated over cuban airspace. To the public the drone plane would have been a small plane with happy students headed for a vacation, ........meanwhile the real story was that the happy students would have been cia operatives vacating the plane before and a drone flown instead.
One of the nastiest thing that i have read in the operation was to blow up cuban refugees right out of the water with usa commandeered MIG look-alike.
 
Boloboffin
The signficance of OPERATION NORTHWOOD, is not that it details 9/11 precisely but that the government wanted to cause terrorism in the states so that it may get support to invade Cuba. Similarly 9/11 had the same effect. It gave president Bush carte-blanche to invade which ever country he deemed necessary.

If I was going to do that, for those reasons, than I would have made the desired 'target' more obvious. Like maybe tapes issued to all news networks from pretend terrorists claiming responsibility and laughing at it - to ensure that nation was incensed enough to encourage me to go get them. Or maybe a telegram to Bush "from Sadam Hussein" that could be widely shown to the media, saying 'how'd you like me now, bubba?'.

You know, something that left no room for debate about the guilty party who would then of course deserve to be invaded.

What's your theory behind why they would blame Bin Laden, to invade Hussein?
 

Ah! The usual last resort of the fringe believer. Attempt to improvise himself a psychologist.

You might want to try evidence, instead.

NIST said - this flowing material had no visual signs that it was burning. Then they proceed to say this material does have an orange glow like that of logs burning in a fireplace.

...So... where's the contradiction ?

You need to have a clear understanding of what Doublethink is before you can understand why it's such a big deal. That wasn't a mere slip of the tongue...it was a clear sign of psychosis.

Ah, so you're a psychologist for real ?
 
Is 28th kingdom a biased, irrational ideologue, or simply crazy like Chris?

Inquiring minds want to know.
 
Boloboffin
The signficance of OPERATION NORTHWOOD, is not that it details 9/11 precisely but that the government wanted to cause terrorism in the states so that it may get support to invade Cuba.

The significance of Operation Northwoods is that Kennedy rejected it out of hand, demoted the Chairman of the Joint Cheifs of Staff soon thereafter and that the document was declassified in its entirety and was published online by the National Security Archive in April 2001.

Oh, it also did not include any necessary killing of American civilians.
 
Is 28th kingdom a biased, irrational ideologue, or simply crazy like Chris?

Inquiring minds want to know.
Based on the following two quotes, I'm voting for your third choice.

Oh, right....the video footage of OBL saying he hates America and wants to attack it. Does OBL speak english? How do you know what he's saying? He could be talking about making grits and eggs for all you know. You trust what the media tells you he's saying?

At the sake of sounding like a genius...you could hammer an asteroid from outer space straight down on one of the (undamaged) twin towers...and it would not cause a chain reaction of floor failures from top to bottom. If anything, it would drill the vertical columns into the ground like a nail.
 
...meanwhile the real story was that the happy students would have been cia operatives vacating the plane before and a drone flown instead.
Hey, congratulations on figuring out that the Northwoods document described blowing up an empty plane. Most CT people can't grasp that.

The signficance of OPERATION NORTHWOOD, is not that it details 9/11 precisely but that the government wanted to cause terrorism in the states so that it may get support to invade Cuba. Similarly 9/11 had the same effect. It gave president Bush carte-blanche to invade which ever country he deemed necessary.
So Bush really wanted to invade Afghanistan, so they staged the 9/11 attack to give him carte blanche to do so? Why? (note: do yourself a favor and don't mention the fantasy oil pipeline).

Surely you're not saying that 9/11 was staged so we could invade Iraq, that makes no sense. It took us a year and a half, with lots of diplomatic (or un-diplomatic) efforts, and still never mentioning that our invasion is a result of 9/11 but some business about suspected WMDs and Hussein's occasional shooting at our planes.
 
Boloboffin
The signficance of OPERATION NORTHWOOD, is not that it details 9/11 precisely but that the government wanted to cause terrorism in the states so that it may get support to invade Cuba. Similarly 9/11 had the same effect. It gave president Bush carte-blanche to invade which ever country he deemed necessary. Whichever group designed 9/11 used the fact that there are real arab terrorist and interwined that with their own plans. The suspected that the general public will know no difference.
Outline in OPERATION NORTHWOOD was a drone plane that was suppose to be detonated over cuban airspace. To the public the drone plane would have been a small plane with happy students headed for a vacation, ........meanwhile the real story was that the happy students would have been cia operatives vacating the plane before and a drone flown instead.
One of the nastiest thing that i have read in the operation was to blow up cuban refugees right out of the water with usa commandeered MIG look-alike.

Thank you for your careful explanation. However, I understood all of that before. As has been pointed out, Kennedy threw the people behind this report to the wolves.

What fascinates me about the CT obsession with Operations Northwood is not simply its use to isolate its target audience (Kennedy wouldn't, but would Bush? The Bush supporters leave, and the Bush detractors think about it). The desire to see 9/11 as a Northwoods-type false flag has given us such quixotic quests as the attempt to show that the planes as commercial flights never existed (the BTS database manipulation, already referred to by 28th) and that the passengers themselves never existed.

I believe it was Holmgrem that scoured the available Social Security records of the passengers and concluded that since many didn't apply for the death benefit or were not listed there, that they must not have existed. The database isn't a complete record of all Americans by any means, and many of the people on the planes were not collecting Social Security anyway. That didn't stop CTers from manipulating these data sets to imply that these passengers were created for the purpose of duping the American public into war, just like the suggested drone plane scenario of Northwood.
 
Interesting assertion.

I used to be a believer, before. Now I'm an atheist. There's a number of things I believed and changed my mind because I was given enough information to do so, sometimes on this very forum.

If it's impossible to change someone's mind, then we're all wasting our time, here, and Randi should close the website entirely.

Otherwise, I think we should each stick to the debates we care about and to which we can contribute. The rest, we leave to other people.

But please, oh, please: no cats.

I think people would be pleasantly surprised if it were ever possible to know the whole truth about such "conversions". I've seen people fretting on CT forums about tiny things - like a bandana found at Shankesville (say) - be shown other evidence about the stuff that can survive a plane crash, then quietly slip away. Others have actually absorbed information about the softening of steel in office fires, etc

The real loudmouth pontificators like 28th, though, just get all the more fired up and entrenched and the effort might even be self-defeating. Maybe even it enables him/her to sharpen and refine their stupidity?

So here's a kitten :D

images
 

Back
Top Bottom