• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
How about at Cat in a Rack?
catsnrackspv9.jpg


or this rack

cattenundrackenbg3.jpg
 
Christophera said:
I have not ignored you images of steel in the core area. I have explained it logically in 2 different ways as being elevator guide rail support steel.
Click to expand...

Belz... said:
Two different ways ? Which one is the RIGHT way ?
Click to expand...

They are both right because they are both reasonable, logical explanations.

1.)It is well known that contracts depended on elevators reaching as far up as possible in the towers. So it is logical that occasionally elevator guide rail supprt steel would extend above false floors and be seen in aerials.

2.)Since the images of the core during the towers demise do not show protruding core columns, the misrepresented elevator guide rail suppoprt steel are not "core columns" because core columns are by necessity, very strong and would survive to be seen.

It is a done deal. There is no forensic evidence for the steel croe columns and the evidence for the concrete core shows that no steel core columns existed.

You have no competent evidence in this discussion.
 
Belz... said:
You're the one who claimed that the exterior columns were cut into neat little transportable lenghts. Why couldn't they do this with the core columns ?
Click to expand...

No, I calim the interior box columns were cut into approximtely 40 foot lengths and it was effected by very efficient cutting charges built into the floors.

Since there was not much flooring in the core, there was nothing to house the containment system for the cutting charges in the core. Without super efficient cutting charges, cutting the supposed core columns, also supposedly box shaped, would require perhaps 40 pounds of high density high explosive per cut. That explosive would have to be in direct contact with the steel. For 47 1300 foot columns this requires upwards of 1300 cuts.

Do the math and you will find that is about 26 tons of uncontained high explosive going off. This, ....... will completely change the character of the event that was seen.
 
Christophera said:
No, I calim the interior box columns were cut into approximtely 40 foot lengths and it was effected by very efficient cutting charges built into the floors.

Since there was not much flooring in the core, there was nothing to house the containment system for the cutting charges in the core. Without super efficient cutting charges, cutting the supposed core columns, also supposedly box shaped, would require perhaps 40 pounds of high density high explosive per cut. That explosive would have to be in direct contact with the steel. For 47 1300 foot columns this requires upwards of 1300 cuts.

Do the math and you will find that is about 26 tons of uncontained high explosive going off. This, ....... will completely change the character of the event that was seen.
Click to expand...

It would be funny if you had some proof. Do you have some proof?
 
Christophera said:
The nature of the cut on the columns is easy to prove. That is not a chop saw, not a band saw, not a torch cut. There were hundreds of them all uniform lengths with those smoot square cuts.


No problem proving how many interior box columns were cut at uniform lengths with square cut ends.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4032&d=1163315538
Click to expand...
were the core columns 42 1300 foot solid peices of steel, or were they composed of smaller peices?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom