• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
SezMe said:
Everybody knows Chris is not going to present any useful evidence. No new, relevant information has been put on the table for at least 100 pages. Its gotten to be a very old dance. I'm gonna hang in till we hit 10000 posts just for the heck of it, then I, for one, am outta here.
Click to expand...

You can try to blame my evidence for your inability to use it, but because the deniers of the concrete core do not have any for the steel core columns, you cannot blame me for not being able to provide absolutely, logical explanations for what you THINK is evidence for steel core columns, when such explanations are totally consistent with the evidence I have for the concrete core.

We have just under 8000 posts from deniers to evidence this fact. The thread is a raging success. Thank you all.
 
Several core columns at elevation from the collapse. Don't even try to tell me they are massive box columns.
 

Attachments

  • corelows.jpg
    corelows.jpg
    13 KB · Views: 273
mortimer said:
Several core columns at elevation from the collapse. Don't even try to tell me they are massive box columns.
Click to expand...

attachment.php


If you had read the thread you would know I've already shown that. The rectangular proportions of the wall of interior box columns (just before core blast, concrete shear wall left of steel) matches that of that formed by the floor beams and the "MASSIVE BOX COLUMNS".

It is actually quite easy to see that the core area is empty. The image just before that shows the lower concrete core exploding.

The interior box columns on that side had cutting charges
 
defaultdotxbe said:
i went to my fridge to get a beer for the big 10k and when i came back we're on 10k +2

...i feel like i just missed new years :(
Click to expand...

Sucks... I wanted to be around for the 10k... Oh well...

I think I'm done here as well. There's no point arguing Chris. I'll keep an eye on the thread though.

Oh, and Chris...

GET HELP!!
 
Christophera said:
attachment.php


If you had read the thread you would know I've already shown that. The rectangular proportions of the wall of interior box columns (just before core blast, concrete shear wall left of steel) matches that of that formed by the floor beams and the "MASSIVE BOX COLUMNS".

It is actually quite easy to see that the core area is empty. The image just before that shows the lower concrete core exploding.

The interior box columns on that side had cutting charges
Click to expand...

Chris, I've read the thread. I've been here from the beginning. I believe I told you not to say they were interior box columns. Please pay attention. These are CORE COLUMNS. No concrete core in sight.
 
Christophera said:
Perhaps you have not noted that there is good reason to believe that the US is still a British Colony in some ways.
Click to expand...

:jaw-dropp


Christophera said:
We have just under 8000 posts from deniers to evidence this fact. The thread is a raging success. Thank you all.
Click to expand...

:eye-poppi


I wonder if meeting Christophera in person for lunch would be fascinating, or frightening.

You know, since we've reached 10,000 posts, here's what I'm going to do. I'm going to concede. You win, Christophera. It was a concrete core. It was 3" by 4' rebar. It was interior box columns, or whatever. George Bush pressed the button to blow it up. We were all hypnotized. And if my job application goes through and I get hired, I'll be an agent of the U.S. government and I guess that means I'm in on it too. You were right all along.

Congratulations. Bye now.
 
mortimer said:
Chris, I've read the thread. I've been here from the beginning. I believe I told you not to say they were interior box columns. Please pay attention. These are CORE COLUMNS. No concrete core in sight.
Click to expand...

Say what you want, I know what was there.

I posted the image that shows the concrete blowing up and there is noting inside the core. One can easily see the spire is the corner of the core
 
defaultdotxbe said:
i went to my fridge to get a beer for the big 10k and when i came back we're on 10k +2

...i feel like i just missed new years :(
Click to expand...

My 2294th post got the 10k post, and it was good post too. Better than that beer. At least brew your own, that way the preservatives won't pickle you. That corporate brew is deadly.
 
Christophera said:
My 2294th post got the 10k post, and it was good post too. Better than that beer. At least brew your own, that way the preservatives won't pickle you. That corporate brew is deadly.
Click to expand...

[nature documentary]Notice how on the 10010th post, the conspiritos lunacus introduces yet another conspiracy theory, to keep things interesting for those who would prey on it...[/nature documentary]
 
Chris, Im sorry but the thread is over. You haven't proven anything that you claim.

so its now time for cats and puppies

cause_this_is_thrillah.jpg
 
Last edited:
CHRIS: YOU'VE LOST

GIVE UP


TRY BAUTFORUM OR SOMETHING (they'll slaughter you there as well)
 
Christophera said:
Your selectivity exposes your disinterest in the truth. I have an image which you cannot explain of 500 feet of concrete dust.
Click to expand...

Fixed

I have not ignored you images of steel in the core area. I have explained it logically in 2 different ways as being elevator guide rail support steel.
Click to expand...

Two different ways ? Which one is the RIGHT way ?

We know the elevators had to have guide rails.
Click to expand...

We also know they had to be built AFTER the shafts.

We know that steel core columns ARE VERY STRONG. That, theoretically is why they exist.
Click to expand...

Same goes for the concrete. Are you saying the concrete cannot be destroyed, either ?

You're the one who claimed that the exterior columns were cut into neat little transportable lenghts. Why couldn't they do this with the core columns ?

If they we steel core columns and NO elevator guide rail supports the WOULD be seen protruding from the core area of WTC 2.

They are not. Therefore they are not steeel core columns,
Click to expand...

Circular reasoning.

Since the towers did have a "tube in a tube" construction, and steel reinforced cast concrete tube inside of a steel framework in a tubular configuration fits the description of the constrcution about as good as can be, the towers had a steel reinforced cast concrete core.
Click to expand...

MORE circular reasoning.

Any effort to present your images of construction showing vertical steel and label them "core columns IS misrepresentation of evidence. Is illogical and without rational, reasonable basis.
Click to expand...

What does logic have to do with that ?

If I was discussing this issue with reasonable, logical and accountable people about 200 posts would have done it. Because of idiotic posts of cata, dogs, counting beers on the walls and baking recipes, we are approaching ten thousand posts.
Click to expand...

Actually, there are over 2000 posts that are basically a repost of the same post, so you're more to blame than anyone else.

I logically showed that the explanation you describe was illogical because no steel core column ends are seen protruding.
Click to expand...

And I have argued that none SHOULD be seen. Or are you contending that the perps couldn't have cut the core columns with explosives ?

This image shows that the interior box columns were strong enough to stand hundreds of feet on their own.
Click to expand...

That's because you have DECIDED to call them box columns.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom