• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

se7ensnakes said:
...
Click to expand...

VERY sorry but this THREAD is about if PICTURES of CATS that ARE black exist OR not.

I say NOT!!!!


949045828828df6bb.jpg
 
JonnyFive said:
No kidding, that's the Hungarian Shadow Beast that haunts my nightmares.
Click to expand...

AHHHHHHHH! You turned the PAGE!



JonnyFive said:
ETA: I would love to actually see some proof that the thermite cutting can be done as 28K claims, and that it indeed looks like he claims as well.

But he seems to be moving the goalposts to a more LIHOP stance, so maybe he's backed off the thermite thing a bit. Comments, 28K?
Click to expand...

He's all over the map.

I've got a few more patents that I'll get around to posting that will muddy the waters quite well, I think.
 
Everyone requested that I move back to the therma/ite issue, so I obliged and did so with my last couple posts. Please, let's just focus on one key point until we find some type of resolution. I presented my analysis and facts in a very straight forward way, now please refute my claims with your own analysis and facts.

If anyone is familiar with a therma/ite reaction, you will know pyrotechnic [FONT=arial,sans-serif][SIZE=-1][/SIZE][/FONT]show it puts on. Here is a typical therma/ite reaction where you can espy this phenomenon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEmHJORTlqk

Notice the sparks and the way the molten metal jumps around almost like fireworks. This is caused by the extreme heat being emitted from the chemical reaction. Now, compare the therma/ite reaction to this video of the pouring metal coming from WTC 2:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=545886459853896774

NIST claims this is molten aluminum. But, molten aluminum will NOT have this type of pyrotechnic reaction at a max temp of 1000C. Here is what molten aluminum looks like when flowing downward:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gge5NyqoNIQ

I encourage everyone here to review the video evidence I have presented, and reply with your analysis with resources to back up your claims.

Thanks for reading.
 
JonnyFive said:
Careful, that government disinfo un-cat is wiring up some det-cord to what appears to be a tub of C4!

Everyone knows that your house doesn't collapse from fire and plane impact alone, it must be CD!
Click to expand...

Actually, if you look closely, you'll see he's investigating my home brewing kit. Hey, he is young, single and (mostly!) male*, you know!





*But still not a CAT!
 
28th Kingdom said:
Everyone requested that I move back to the therma/ite issue, so I obliged and did so with my last couple posts. Please, let's just focus on one key point until we find some type of resolution. I presented my analysis and facts in a very straight forward way, now please refute my claims with your own analysis and facts.

If anyone is familiar with a therma/ite reaction, you will know pyrotechnic show it puts on. Here is a typical therma/ite reaction where you can espy this phenomenon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEmHJORTlqk

Notice the sparks and the way the molten metal jumps around almost like fireworks. This is caused by the extreme heat being emitted from the chemical reaction. Now, compare the therma/ite reaction to this video of the pouring metal coming from WTC 2:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=545886459853896774

NIST claims this is molten aluminum. But, molten aluminum will NOT have this type of pyrotechnic reaction at a max temp of 1000C. Here is what molten aluminum looks like when flowing downward:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gge5NyqoNIQ

I encourage everyone here to review the video evidence I have presented, and reply with your analysis with resources to back up your claims.

Thanks for reading.
Click to expand...
please state the means by which thermite can cut a vertical steel column
 
28th Kingdom said:
Everyone requested that I move back to the therma/ite issue, so I obliged and did so with my last couple posts. Please, let's just focus on one key point until we find some type of resolution. I presented my analysis and facts in a very straight forward way, now please refute my claims with your own analysis and facts.

If anyone is familiar with a therma/ite reaction, you will know pyrotechnic show it puts on. Here is a typical therma/ite reaction where you can espy this phenomenon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEmHJORTlqk

Notice the sparks and the way the molten metal jumps around almost like fireworks. This is caused by the extreme heat being emitted from the chemical reaction. Now, compare the therma/ite reaction to this video of the pouring metal coming from WTC 2:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=545886459853896774

NIST claims this is molten aluminum. But, molten aluminum will NOT have this type of pyrotechnic reaction at a max temp of 1000C. Here is what molten aluminum looks like when flowing downward:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gge5NyqoNIQ

I encourage everyone here to review the video evidence I have presented, and reply with your analysis with resources to back up your claims.

Thanks for reading.
Click to expand...

No, NIST states that it is likely aluminum, contaminated by flammable debris.
 
Horatius said:
Actually, if you look closely, you'll see he's investigating my home brewing kit. Hey, he is young, single and (mostly!) male*, you know!
Click to expand...

So he's got nothing to lose. Are you sure it's a home brewing kit? Have you checked for a concrete core with special plastic coated rebar yet?




*But still not a CAT!
Click to expand...

Obviously.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
no buildings collapsed entirely into their own footprint on 9/11 either
Click to expand...

Minus all the semantic word play - WTC 7 fell down symmetrically...whether you want to say all the rubble is in the footprint or not... is besides the point. No one can deny that WTC 7 collapsed uniformly. There was damage to one side of WTC 7, which is random damage - random damage should mean random collapse. You know - half a building can fall off or collapse without the other side which is COMPLETELY untouched and undamaged falling down with it. You want proof?

http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8733/ntp10ijj3.jpg

That's the governments' second attempt at trying to demolish an inhabited building. Strike Two.
 
Last edited:
28th Kingdom said:
Minus all the semantic word play - WTC fell down symmetrically...whether you want to say all the rubble is in the footprint or not... is besides the point. No one can deny that WTC 7 collapsed uniformly. There was damage to one side of WTC 7, which is random damage - random damage should mean random collapse. You know - half a building can fall off or collapse without the other side which is COMPLETELY untouched and undamaged falling down with it. You want proof?

http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8733/ntp10ijj3.jpg

That's the governments' second attempt at trying to demolish an inhabited building. Strike Two.
Click to expand...
Why do the majority of architects and structural engineers that have voiced their opinion disagree with your conclusions?
 
28th Kingdom said:
Minus all the semantic word play - WTC fell down symmetrically...whether you want to say all the rubble is in the footprint or not... is besides the point. No one can deny that WTC 7 collapsed uniformly. There was damage to one side of WTC 7, which is random damage - random damage should mean random collapse.
Click to expand...

You, of course, have detailed technical evidence of all this, right?
 
28th Kingdom said:
Minus all the semantic word play - WTC fell down symmetrically...whether you want to say all the rubble is in the footprint or not... is besides the point. No one can deny that WTC 7 collapsed uniformly. There was damage to one side of WTC 7, which is random damage - random damage should mean random collapse. You know - half a building can fall off or collapse without the other side which is COMPLETELY untouched and undamaged falling down with it. You want proof?

http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8733/ntp10ijj3.jpg

That's the governments' second attempt at trying to demolish an inhabited building. Strike Two.
Click to expand...
woudl you care to compare the construction of that building to that of WTC7 and elt us all know how they are similar?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom