• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

NICE work Horatius...Thanks Bud.
did you even read it? as of september 2002 they are still trying to make something that will cut a horizontal beam (not vertical mind you)

2002-07-09 US2002000191607 Filing date
2001-07-09 US2001000303949P Earliest priority date (they filed a provisional application, which usually means they have a basic idea, but haven't produced a complete working design yet)

so why are they trying to make something if they had a device which functioned so flawlessly a year prior?
 
They are well known, well documented 9/11 truthers...Show me some loyal govt officials who couldnt take it any more and then whistle blew. These guys are the same fellas we argue over daily here...gotta do better.

TAM

WHERE IS THE logic? LOYAL OFFICIALS? UM, if they were so-called...loyal...I guess they wouldn't whistleblow would they? You make no sense...in your world...it's not even possible to have a credible whistleblower...look at those peoples' credentials....I mean...they're not exactly janitors in the navy.
 
WHERE IS THE logic? LOYAL OFFICIALS? UM, if they were so-called...loyal...I guess they wouldn't whistleblow would they? You make no sense...in your world...it's not even possible to have a credible whistleblower...look at those peoples' credentials....I mean...they're not exactly janitors in the navy.
how many of them beleive in a bush administration-engineered controlled demolition?
 
"I first began to suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when the Bush-Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. … We can prove that the government’s story is false."

Morgan Reynolds, PhD – Chief Economist, Department of Labor under George W. Bush 2001-2002. Former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis. Professor Emeritus, Texas A&M University.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8180123292618944278

Finally, this kid is so shallow.

NUT CASE alert, he has picked the Beam Weapon moron.

Beam weapon; no plane; no brain; Morgan Reynolds

I think he may have lost his job due to being insane; what do you think?

You picked a weener...................
 
WHERE IS THE logic? LOYAL OFFICIALS? UM, if they were so-called...loyal...I guess they wouldn't whistleblow would they? You make no sense...in your world...it's not even possible to have a credible whistleblower...look at those peoples' credentials....I mean...they're not exactly janitors in the navy.

WHERE ARE THEIR FACTS???????

FACTS, AND GET PULITZER PRIZE, ME WHAT FACTS.

FACTS?
 
Finally, this kid is so shallow.

NUT CASE alert, he has picked the Beam Weapon moron.

Beam weapon; no plane; no brain; Morgan Reynolds

I think he may have lost his job due to being insane; what do you think?

You picked a weener...................
also, reynolds think steven jones (mr. thermite) is a CIA shill, lol
 
I have been a janitor, you better stop this!!!

If a janitor had facts; the janitor would be our hero!

If you ever had facts we would be surprised and may die from shock!
 
28th Kingdom- guess what? no one in this forum buys your garbage. but..if you give me $10,000, i will believe that 9-11 was an inside job and will suppport your cause. Thats it...give me $10,000...and Im on board.
 
U.S. House of Representatives Speech 10/19/05:
"Intelligence officers ... identified [lead 9/11 hijacker] Mohammed Atta and three terrorists a year before 9/11, tried to transfer that information to the FBI, were denied, and the FBI Director has now said ... the FBI could have used it to perhaps prevent the hijackings. The 9/11 Commission totally ignored this entire story.

I am a strong supporter of our military. I am a strong supporter of President Bush. I say all of that, Mr. Speaker, because ... there is something desperately wrong here. I have met with at least 10 people who fully corroborate what [intelligence officer] Tony Shaffer says. This is not [about] Republicans or Democrats. It is about what is fundamental to this country."

Rep. Curt Weldon – Ten-term Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania. House Armed Services Committee Vice Chairman. Homeland Security Committee Vice Chairman.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,167130,00.html
 
Finally, this kid is so shallow.

NUT CASE alert, he has picked the Beam Weapon moron.

Beam weapon; no plane; no brain; Morgan Reynolds

I think he may have lost his job due to being insane; what do you think?

You picked a weener...................
....dog.

Weiner%20Dog.jpg
 
U.S. House of Representatives Speech 10/19/05:
"Intelligence officers ... identified [lead 9/11 hijacker] Mohammed Atta and three terrorists a year before 9/11, tried to transfer that information to the FBI, were denied, and the FBI Director has now said ... the FBI could have used it to perhaps prevent the hijackings. The 9/11 Commission totally ignored this entire story.

I am a strong supporter of our military. I am a strong supporter of President Bush. I say all of that, Mr. Speaker, because ... there is something desperately wrong here. I have met with at least 10 people who fully corroborate what [intelligence officer] Tony Shaffer says. This is not [about] Republicans or Democrats. It is about what is fundamental to this country."

Rep. Curt Weldon – Ten-term Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania. House Armed Services Committee Vice Chairman. Homeland Security Committee Vice Chairman.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,167130,00.html
and this proves thermite how?
 
now 28th resorts to quotes that are mined out of context

Typical troll

He has now what? over 100 unanswered questions?
 
"Senators from both parties accused the Defense Department...of obstructing an investigation into whether a highly classified intelligence program known as Able Danger did indeed identify Mohamed Atta and other future hijackers as potential threats well before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The Pentagon blocked several witnesses from testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The officers have said they were prevented by the Pentagon from sharing information about Mr. Atta and others with the [FBI]. The Pentagon has acknowledged that at least five members of Able Danger have said they recall a chart produced in 2000 that identified Mr. Atta, who became the lead hijacker in the Sept. 11 plot, as a potential terrorist."
-- New York Times, 9/22/05
 
"Senators from both parties accused the Defense Department...of obstructing an investigation into whether a highly classified intelligence program known as Able Danger did indeed identify Mohamed Atta and other future hijackers as potential threats well before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The Pentagon blocked several witnesses from testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The officers have said they were prevented by the Pentagon from sharing information about Mr. Atta and others with the [FBI]. The Pentagon has acknowledged that at least five members of Able Danger have said they recall a chart produced in 2000 that identified Mr. Atta, who became the lead hijacker in the Sept. 11 plot, as a potential terrorist."
-- New York Times, 9/22/05


again, how does this prove inside job/ thermite/free fall/ etc?

No one is saying that the investigations didn't meet with their own problems and hurdles. The fact that these reports are OUT, means they worked through those problems and hurdles to get their answers.
 
National security whistle-blowers allege retaliation
February 16 , 2006, Sacramento Bee
(leading newspaper of California's capital city)
http://www.sacbee.com/24hour/politics/story/3168792p-11877323c.html
Military and intelligence officers told spellbound lawmakers Tuesday that their careers had been ruined by superiors because they refused to lie about Able Danger, Abu Ghraib and other national security controversies. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer...told a House Government Reform subcommittee that he and other intelligence officers and contractors working on the top-secret program code-named "Able Danger" had identified Mohammed Atta, ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks, but were prevented from passing their findings to the FBI. "Many of us have a personal commitment to ... going forward to expose the truth and wrongdoing of government officials who, before and after the 9/11 attacks, failed to do their job." Shaffer contradicted recent statements by Philip Zelikow, former executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, who denied having met with Shaffer and other Able Danger operatives in Afghanistan in October 2003. "I did meet with him," Shaffer said. "I have the business card he gave me. I find it hard to believe that he could not remember meeting me." The commission's chairman and vice chairman, former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, released a statement saying the panel had looked into the work of Able Danger and found it "historically insignificant."
 
"Senators from both parties accused the Defense Department...of obstructing an investigation into whether a highly classified intelligence program known as Able Danger did indeed identify Mohamed Atta and other future hijackers as potential threats well before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The Pentagon blocked several witnesses from testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The officers have said they were prevented by the Pentagon from sharing information about Mr. Atta and others with the [FBI]. The Pentagon has acknowledged that at least five members of Able Danger have said they recall a chart produced in 2000 that identified Mr. Atta, who became the lead hijacker in the Sept. 11 plot, as a potential terrorist."
-- New York Times, 9/22/05

Not even, the lawyer or the person he represents (Anthony Shaffer) believes in LIHOP or MIHOP.
 
He is not on auto pilot, remote control by Alex Jones!

28th, you have a few post to answer! Hello, 28th, are you Alex Jones kid?
 

Back
Top Bottom