• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

Yea, I see the difference...you're not being objective and I am...need proof? Someone on here asked me...have I even entertained the idea that I might be wrong about the PET. WELL GUESS WHAT? I HAVE ENTERTAINED such an idea...because I'm the only one here who has been on both sides of this debate. I believed the official story first...BUT THEN I ENTERTAINED the idea (which I implore you guys to do) THAT I MIGHT BE WRONG....and after close and careful analysis...I CONCLUDED THAT without a shadow of doubt - 9/11 IS AN INSIDE JOB.

If I weren't 100% sure (backed with scientific fact and evidence) than I would probably still believe the official "story."
28,

You have a perverse idea of "scientific fact and evidence."

You cannot even reason logically, or respond to objections to your so-called "evidence."

If you tried to get an article published in any respected scientific journal, using your sort of reasoning, it would be rejected immediately, even before being sent to reviewers.

Have you even taken any science courses? If so, what grades did you obtain?

You see, there's a little something called the scientific method. It demands that results be falsifiable. If you just claim that you looked at something and it "looked" some way (the drips of the metal, for instance; they "look" to you like they "must be" hotter than 1000 C because that's how a volcano "looks" or something), that is NOT the scientific method.

And yes, I'm sure all of us, as well, have considered "both sides" of the CT debate objectively.

It's just that all the facts and evidence lie with the generally accepted view of 9/11, and none (or very few, and weak) support the CT view.

Please, though, respond with the science classes you have taken, what level they were at, and your grades.

By the way, just to let you know, I have a B.S. in Chemistry, with an A- average.
 
in other words you have no clue whatsoever

Damm you beat me to it.:)

28ths Evidence=zero.
28ths Credibilty=zero
28ths Irrational delusions= infinite.

No more time for you 28th, I’m afraid it’s Kitty Time.

lucy-milo.jpg
 
Gee...roughly a thousand posts ago, here, you were shown a video. In it, you could clearly see the inward bending, then buckling, of the walls you insist must be blown outward by explosives.

28th's reply to this will be along the lines of:

"Mark Bingham supposedly called his mother and said, 'Hi mom, this is Mark Bingham'. Why would he use his last name? Voice-morphing technology!"
 
"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up."

Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. Air Force fighter pilot, over 100 combat missions. PhD in Aeronautics, Nuclear Engineering.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
 
Regarding 9/11: "The official story could not possibly have happened. It’s not possible. It’s not operationally feasible. ... The Commission was a whitewash."

You want a lot of government officials who question the US on 9/11? This page has ALL MAINSTREAM media quotes from these people:

http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport
so how many of those actually beleive in your wacky demolition theories an dhow many think the military effed up royally and are now trying to cover their asses?
 
Regarding 9/11: "The official story could not possibly have happened. It’s not possible. It’s not operationally feasible. ... The Commission was a whitewash."

You want a lot of government officials who question the US on 9/11? This page has ALL MAINSTREAM media quotes from these people:

http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport

Moron! The majority of those people are talking about incompetence of the authorities, not a conspiracy to murder US citizens.

The US ****ed up - the TSA, the forerunners of the Homeland Security agencies, the FBI, the CIA, the police, immigration... they all ****ed up, as proven by by the fact that those two whopping great planes flew into the towers. It is undoubtable, as the 911-Commission investigated in great detail, that these agencies went to lengths to cover their incompetencies, to pass the blame and, basically, to cover their asses. That's what these people are getting at...
 
"I, like the others, am frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case."

Major Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps – Former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991-1998.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1232419751782017310
 
"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up."

Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. Air Force fighter pilot, over 100 combat missions. PhD in Aeronautics, Nuclear Engineering.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674

"I, like the others, am frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case."

Major Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps – Former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991-1998.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1232419751782017310
so which of these proves controlled demolition again?
 
I`m Henry the eighth I am
Henry the eighth I am, I am
I got married to the widow next door
She`s been married seven times before
And every one was an Henry (Henry)
She wouldn`t have a Willy or a Sam (no Sam)
I`m her eighth old man, I`m Henry
Henry the eighth I am

Second verse same as the first

I`m Henry the eighth I am
Henry the eighth I am, I am
I got married to the widow next door
She`s been married seven times before
And every one was an Henry (Henry)
She wouldn`t have a Willy or a Sam (no Sam)
I`m her eighth old man, I`m Henry
Henry the eighth I am


repeat ad nauseum
 
Regarding 9/11: "The official story could not possibly have happened. It’s not possible. It’s not operationally feasible. ... The Commission was a whitewash."

You want a lot of government officials who question the US on 9/11? This page has ALL MAINSTREAM media quotes from these people:

http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport


Hmmmmmm...interesting...not one scientist on that webpage.

Like I said before...you're more than 31 flavors of moronic.

Are you going to answer Architects question? or are you just going to keep :covereyes
 
"I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false.

Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer
 
"I, like the others, am frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case."

Major Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps – Former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991-1998.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1232419751782017310

Wow. For once, you posted something we agree with.

Sad thing is, I'm guessing you think this means that Major Ritter thinks the US government murdered its own citizens, when in fact he's just very vocally critical of the bureaucratic machine...
 

Back
Top Bottom