Wow, that's an impressive proof.It really is a proven fact. It's just as tacky as using Beethoven or Shakespeare out of context.
Why should jazz not be used as a metaphor? How would you construct a metaphor between baseball and jazz? Why should such a metaphor be restricted to verbal use only?
I'll grant that jazz was very poorly selected in this instance. Metaphors exist because subjective experience often transcends our ability to express it literally. If jazz can, to some degree, effectively communicate my feelings or sentiment about another subject then I will use it. I don't find any word or subject sacrosanct. We can love and appreciate jazz without revering it.I have a request. Please do not make jazz into a metaphor. It really doesn't deserve such sloppy handling.
The only allowable metaphor for jazz might be an old baseball game, but only given orally, and in proper vernacular. Otherwise, please don't.
Kind of like the way jazz exists because subjective experience transcends our ability to express it verbally.Metaphors exist because subjective experience often transcends our ability to express it literally.

Kind of like the way jazz exists because subjective experience transcends our ability to express it verbally.
![]()
Sort of what Marquis said.
For me jazz is sort of sacred.
Besides, you wouldn't mix a good single malt scotch with soda, would you?
A Mormon who has never had his name taken off of Church records and is also an atheist.And what the hell is a Mormon atheist?