• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
DHR said:
How can you fight aginst the unconscious? We are all doomed. Mankind is doomed. Why argue when we have no choice?

Is this my Ego or my Id?
Click to expand...

If you think it is your Ego, you are right. Your unconscious knows otherwise and it is in control.
 
Christophera said:
If you think it is your Ego, you are right. Your unconscious knows otherwise and it is in control.
Click to expand...

Riiight. So you're saying that as well as everyone else being "in on it", now you are as well? Mate, if you're conspiring with the NWO against yourself, I think you should probably stop resisting; just run with it, you know, see how it works out. At least you'll get your christmas ham delivered by black helicopter; beats the grocery guy.
 
hcmom said:
So what makes you think I'd do a better job?
Click to expand...

By serve I mean your needs. Your needs are very similar to everyone elses. Begin by agreeing with them on what is shared. In doing this you create the basis for what NEEDS to be in the re wrtten book. If you/we begin there we cannot go wrong.

Personally, I know the first thing we need is our lives. This is why the first of this short list that is in the position it is, "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happness."

On 9-11 3,000 lost their first need and our infiltrated government stopped due process which engagers now, our need. The truth will protect us.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
 
Christophera said:
By serve I mean your needs. Your needs are very similar to everyone elses. Begin by agreeing with them on what is shared. In doing this you create the basis for what NEEDS to be in the re wrtten book. If you/we begin there we cannot go wrong.
Click to expand...

I know what's being served. I'm curious as to why you think it's ok to rewrite something based on personal needs. You have no way of knowing if my needs are even in the same ballfield as everyone else's.
 
hcmom said:
I know what's being served. I'm curious as to why you think it's ok to rewrite something based on personal needs. You have no way of knowing if my needs are even in the same ballfield as everyone else's.
Click to expand...

Those are wants. You will find our needs on a basic level are almost identical.

You have articulated the confusion our educational system and media have created.
 
I can't help it. I have to post. It's like a bad addiction.


Christophera said:
Yes, or alcohol. The notable smell which I've read about indicates probably acetone.
Click to expand...

Isn't acetone flammable? Wouldn't it have burned up when the C-4 went, leaving no trace to smell?


christophera said:
No, nothing snapped. I recognized a demolition immediately as I've done enough demolition of buildings to know what collapses look like. I bumped them in the right place and they collapsed.

Planes and fires did not pulverize the towers from the top down.
Click to expand...

You bumped them? What, just back up in your pickup truck and tap them with the bumper?

Christophera said:
The tower below the impact point because nothing goes down in a collapse until support is removed. The event went from the top down after it started, go watch a video.
Click to expand...

Nothing? Ever? Try this: build a tower out of children's wooden blocks. Then drop a dictionary on the top. The resulting collapse was not due to the removal of supports directly, but to the large amount of energy added to the top...much like when the upper stories collapsed onto the lower ones.
 
NobbyNobbs said:
Isn't acetone flammable? Wouldn't it have burned up when the C-4 went, leaving no trace to smell?
Click to expand...

I refer to the smell soldiers have noted of C4.

NobbyNobbs said:
You bumped them? What, just back up in your pickup truck and tap them with the bumper?
Click to expand...

Very funny. A hydraulic excavator or crawler loader.

NobbyNobbs said:
Nothing? Ever? Try this: build a tower out of children's wooden blocks. Then drop a dictionary on the top. The resulting collapse was not due to the removal of supports directly, but to the large amount of energy added to the top...much like when the upper stories collapsed onto the lower ones.
Click to expand...

You are the first proponent of a space based giant book weapon.

Can you understand that the building took the load historically and there was no space for acceleration so there was no energy added?
 
Christophera said:
I refer to the smell soldiers have noted of C4.



Very funny. A hydraulic excavator or crawler loader.



You are the first proponent of a space based giant book weapon.

Can you understand that the building took the load historically and there was no space for acceleration so there was no energy added?
Click to expand...

The space for acceleration happened when the planes destroyed the steel and the fire weakened it.
 
DHR said:
The space for acceleration happened when the planes destroyed the steel and the fire weakened it.
Click to expand...

And, if that happened it was not symetrical and the way it did happen was major weakening would have been on the side where the perimeter walls were cut by plane impact meaning the top would have fallen that way but both tops fell another direction.

Your notion does not make sense.
 
Christophera said:
Basically, this thread has proven that there is no raw evidence for any core except the steel reinforced, tubular cast concrete core.
Click to expand...
Oh, gee. I thought it had proven that we are all hypnotized by the long-dead Antap who impressed the numbers 21, 22, and 23 on our unconscious (as opposed to subconscious) minds voiding us of free thought and wiping all memory of a emmy-winning 2-hour documentary.

The Antap are headquartered in Santa Barbara, CA.

You live near there, Chris, don't you?

Do the Antap have a concrete core?
 
jsfisher said:
Oh, gee. I thought it had proven that we are all hypnotized by the long-dead Antap who impressed the numbers 21, 22, and 23 on our unconscious (as opposed to subconscious) minds voiding us of free thought and wiping all memory of a emmy-winning 2-hour documentary.

The Antap are headquartered in Santa Barbara, CA.

You live near there, Chris, don't you?

Do the Antap have a concrete core?
Click to expand...

Yea, we're hard core.

Got evidence of steel core columns?

You need evidence to be reasonable. I have evidence and it prove my point.

Do you know what a concrete wall looks like viewd from one end? Here is a a concrete shear wall that happens to be holding up the spire which is formed by an interio box column, not a "core column" like fools who enjoy being decieved believe in.
 
Christophera said:
First, the people of New York voted it down perhaps 3 times. Rockefeller pushed it and got it built.

The purposes of the demolition were many.
Click to expand...

Such as? Give me one plausible reason why on Earth Yamasaki-san, PANYNJ, NSA or whoever thought it would be a great idea to build two huge skyscrapers lined with explosive. :confused:

Give me one reason why they thought they needed to lie from Day 1 about the concrete-cored construction of the towers: http://www.skyscraper.org/TALLEST_TOWERS/t_wtc.htm is just one site that repeats this supposed fallacy about the steel core. I've visited perhaps twenty other sites about the WTC, and they all follow this party line. Why would it have been so damaging to reveal the concrete core of the WTC?

The WTC memorial, Freedom Tower, is stated to have a concrete core from the start. Perhaps that means it must really have a steel core! :D

However, the relevant powers let some PBS documentary cameramen in to expose this lie? Did nobody else on seeing this documentary say: "Hold on, I thought the big thing about the WTC was that it had a steel core! What are they playing at?"
 
We've moved on from critiquing his arguments to mocking his disabilities. Time for this thread to die I feel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom