• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe you are just insane...

Actually, Christophera, I know that Garb is putting things harshly here but have you considered seeing a mental health professional, if only to have a chat about your life and the things that drive you?

I don't see that this would do any harm, if your beliefs are reasonable then they won't be cahnged by having a talk - and you'd receive some reassurance about your mental state.

Whatever you decide, I hope things work out well for you.
 
I stopped following this thread a little time ago. However I have had to take action in this thread before and I will again if necessary.

Let me make it clear that Christophera is entitled (like we all are) to post in this Forum as long as he keeps to the few rules and guidelines outlined in the Registration & Membership Agreements.

If you cannot or do not want to respond to a Member's arguments and claims then do not post, do not turn to making personal attacks, doing so will put you in breach of your Membership Agreement.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
I stopped following this thread a little time ago. However I have had to take action in this thread before and I will again if necessary.

Let me make it clear that Christophera is entitled (like we all are) to post in this Forum as long as he keeps to the few rules and guidelines outlined in the Registration & Membership Agreements.

If you cannot or do not want to respond to a Member's arguments and claims then do not post, do not turn to making personal attacks, doing so will put you in breach of your Membership Agreement.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat

Sorry

from where the sun now sets
I will post no more in this thread
forever.
 
Actually, Christophera, I know that Garb is putting things harshly here but have you considered seeing a mental health professional, if only to have a chat about your life and the things that drive you?

I don't see that this would do any harm, if your beliefs are reasonable then they won't be cahnged by having a talk - and you'd receive some reassurance about your mental state.

Whatever you decide, I hope things work out well for you.

Your emotional responses to death and lawlessness are inappropriate. As I've said, it is you that are sick if we are supposed to be a part of a civilized society.

I've been investigating the field of psychology and I've discovered deep negligence and unreasonable, debilitating fears within their ranks. Here is basic evidence proving that. I've learned you cannot use my evidence as you operate with attitude rather than logic and reason so this is really for the viewer so they know I'm not ignoring you while recieving some knowledge about their world.

Here is the results of my approaches to the official authhority of psychology for California and the societal authority of psychology for the nation, the A.P.A.

http://members.tripod.com/truthasaur/2emo13.html

http://members.tripod.com/truthasaur/aparesponse.html
 
Your emotional responses to death and lawlessness are inappropriate. As I've said, it is you that are sick if we are supposed to be a part of a civilized society.

I've been investigating the field of psychology and I've discovered deep negligence and unreasonable, debilitating fears within their ranks. Here is basic evidence proving that. I've learned you cannot use my evidence as you operate with attitude rather than logic and reason so this is really for the viewer so they know I'm not ignoring you while recieving some knowledge about their world.

Here is the results of my approaches to the official authhority of psychology for California and the societal authority of psychology for the nation, the A.P.A.

http://members.tripod.com/truthasaur/2emo13.html

http://members.tripod.com/truthasaur/aparesponse.html

Christophera, I'm out of here. I've read Darat's warning and I agree that it is inappropriate to speculate about your mental health - even if I did so out of concern for your wellbeing and not as an attack. If you've felt offended or personally attacked by my posts then I apologise, it was not my intention.

I won't respond to your arguments except to say that I do not find them convincing and I have this in common with all the people on this thread, except you. Yet no counter-argument over the past 6 months has convinced you that you are fundamentally in error. You may wish to reflect on why this is. It is my hope that one day you'll take time out from defending your position and reassess your views on the world with a clear mind.

Good luck in all you do.
 
Last edited:
Construction began in 1966.

Okay, well all I wanted to say about that is I think it's a little far-fetched to assume LBJ's administration pre-loaded the towers with explosives.

That's all. I'm not going to post here anymore, either. I hope things go well for you, Chris. I really do. Please take care.
 
Christophera, I'm out of here. I've read Darat's warning and I agree that it is inappropriate to speculate about you mental health ...
May I suggest a more focussed approach, then. I think the "free-for-all" we have had has given Christophera maximum wiggle room. Facts and rebuttals go ignored because there's always that next post to which Christophera can recycle old claims.

So, here's my suggestion:

(1) Only one question on the floor is allowed at a time. Posters that try to stray to another point are chastised until Christophera has had a reasonable opportunity to offer a *specific* response. Reminder posts may be necessary.

(2) Images of small furry animals are always appropriate.

(3) Specific questions and the specific response should be accumulated as a digest and periodically reposted so the rest of us don't waste a lot of time on recycled questions.

For the rest of this post, I will adopt tactic #2. Here's the NWO:
 

Attachments

  • Squirrel 1.jpg
    Squirrel 1.jpg
    2.9 KB · Views: 88
Just in case Chris is too lazy:

Well, your not going to save lives by posting a website.

Perhaps you didn't notice. There are at least 6 completely different websites an perhaps 500 web pages altogether. You are wrong.

Finding those that accuse others of what they are guilty of is common. On the websites you were to lazy to examine you will find that there are details of perhaps 5 different lawsuits.

Wow. No wonder your having problems. I grew up in housing projects (government housing).

Sorry to hear you upbringing was so difficult and that your family has been so badly impacted. You might consider using my evidence to file a lawsuit.


The one thing I've learned is that you can't save anybody unless thier looking to be saved.
You also have to be able to save yourself first before you can be in a position to save anybody else. And from the looks of it Chris, you need alot of help yourself.

Further down that the experimental treatment I proposed, I believe has the potential to CHANGE the way a person feels and want to be "saved". Perhaps this is not ethical in all cases but in many it is.

I will not pretend that my anxiety is not off the scale. That is the price of knowledge.

But doing the wrong thing or wasting your time and effort on something that is incorrect is just as bad. Besides pestering the the wrong authorities with incoherency and conjecture is not going to help your case. For them to respond requires massive amount of evidence and corroberating sources. Unfortunatly your website sadly lacks both. And you efforts are being directed at the wrong authorities and improperly so.
For instance, let's take alook at those documents you posted.

Your appraisal of "wrong things and wasting time" or what is "correct" is deficient. Obviously so because you have not read enough, or correctly to inform yourself.

confirmation of a meeting with the director of the Santa Barbara County Mental Health Department and statement of intent to provide the response of the State Mental Health Departments response to their request to teh State for permission to administer an experimental treatment.

In this letter you seem to be asking them for records that date back to 1876 to 1879.

Firstly, that letter is not from me it is to me from the custodian of records at the Santa Barbara County Sherifs Department.

First, The Santa Barbara county sherriff's department wasn't formed untill 1850.you were asking for records that dated back to 26 years after the county was first formed. Second, most organizations do not have active records that date back that far. Documents that old are usually archived off site and usually with a university or historical society. You should have found out where the county historical records are stored, then asked whoever has them for access.
(also, you need to edit the document. It has your address listed on it.)

This is a link to a scan of a Declaration from person who saw the suboenaed records in the law library at the county jail one year before they were subpoenaed Meaning I knew exactly where the records were before I subpoenaed them.

County facilities are not equiped or allowed to perform any experimental proceedures on patients. That is usually done through a research university. And that is only done after a collossal amount of research and study by competent doctors have propsed the procedure through the proper channels.

I've determined the universities have the same problems as the other official entities. I've discovered that psychology has forgotten about forgetting, and memory controls our behaviors to a large degree. Dissociation is a phenomena of memory and MUST, reasonably be in the index of this book titled "Human Memory"

Again homer, read the letter from the Santa Barbara County Mental Health Department and you will see they are looking for permission from the State to administer the experimental treatment. Examine California Health and Safety Code Section 1370.4l(b) at http://law.onecle.com/california/health/1370.4.htm and you will see that by law the counties operating under a state health plan MUST conduct experimental treatments under proper conditions. In this case the County Mental health Department Director AND the chief medical doctor for the department elected to work directly with me and my information. It was their superiors that stopped them and failed to respond to the Freedom Of Information Act request, which is why myself and 3 others are suing in Federal court.

Also, The Freedom of Information Act has absolutly nothing to do with the conducting of experimental medical proceedures. This is further proof that you really don't know what you are doing.

That is true, but that is not what I'm using it to request. I use the Freedom of Information Act to get the response from the State Mental Health Department as promised in the letter from the County Mental Health Department below, no response. which is simple information already (or should be) produced. A point you missed, which doesn't matter is that the FOIA does not apply technically to any agencies except for federal agencies. I've discovered that the courts DO apply it to any governmental agency despite what the law reads. You might note that the defendants have not tried to say it does not apply but instead imply, erroneously, that I did not respond within the tolling of time in the process. A person has 20 days to appeal the denial of information AFTER the denial. The county never denied the request so my charges are valid.

Like I said before, doing the wrong thing is just as bad (if not worse) as doing nothing at all.

Chris, you really need to get help for yourself first. Maybe then you'll be able to think clearer and be able to help those you wish to help.

It should be clear that you do not know what you are doing. Stop trying to critique any of my actions. You are too lazy to research them deeply enough to do so. Also, your reading comprehension is not up to it. My anxiety is my only problem, and you are no help. You are a waste of time, but if I don't answer it might look like you know what you are talking about. You don't. So stop wasting my time.

If you want to help, save the links to the documents regarding the experimental treatment and find some alcoholics or their families and explain to the them how negligent psychology is. Then research your states laws to see if a law exists like 1370.4 (b) and use it to compel the local mental health department to administer the treatment.
 
Last edited:
Christophera, could you please stop calling him Homer? His user name is uruk
 
At last sense has been seen. I hope others follow maccy, slingblade and DHr's responsible sentiments. Any long time followers who continue to argue should let it go.

Over and out...
 
So why do you think it was freefall, Christophera?`I still
don´t get this argument. And what is freefall - to make
clear that we agree about this one.
 
At last sense has been seen. I hope others follow maccy, slingblade and DHr's responsible sentiments. Any long time followers who continue to argue should let it go.

Over and out...

I agree completely.

I fully agree everybody is entitled to their opinion and entitled to voice it.

I have made it clear on a number of occasions during the course of this thread I don't agree with these opinions and as such see no point in being involved in this thread.

This is my last post in this thread.

Signing out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom