Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Before the show, I never really gave much attention to this logo:



Which is a very popular conveniant store in Québec...

Now I know :boxedin:
 
The French (in Europe, at least -- not sure about Francophone Canadians) got in early with the CT: Thierry Meysan's work contains a lot of the dodgy claims you also see in the US ‘truth’ movement.
 
Hearing the same wordings and phrasings over and over again from the CT crowd can actually become an interesting tool. I can reckognise these very often now even in situations unrelated to conspiracy theories.

Is this called positive annoyance?
 
LashL said:
Yes, I recall that several months ago they were claiming that it was going to be in theatres in advance of the 5th anniversary... that obviously didn't work out for them - big surprise.

Despite the assertions of Do Over, etal, no legitimate studio is going to pay them for their plagiarism, which is all that the first several versions of LC has amounted to. They're going to have to come up with something original if they ever expect to make any money from their grotesque exploitation of the victims.
Click to expand...

sheeeet...i know it was more than the naudet stuff. all the cnn footage and other news footage? you've got to get releases for that.

another documentary filmmaker (much more knowledgeable than myself) was talking about all the legal forms they have to have for just one interview subject when they sell a show to TV/Cable.

not to mention that damn helicopter shot at the beginning. i'm pretty sure that's take right out of the HBO special.
 
Can anyone remember some claim on the LC board that there was going to be a nuclear holocaust, or civil war, or NWO takeover or something during OCT / NOV?

They were all talking about how they would prepare for it, etc. I'm sure the date has passed and I just want to gloat....
 
Obviousman said:
Can anyone remember some claim on the LC board that there was going to be a nuclear holocaust, or civil war, or NWO takeover or something during OCT / NOV?

They were all talking about how they would prepare for it, etc. I'm sure the date has passed and I just want to gloat....
Click to expand...

That would be the OCTOBER (!!) surprise. I think it envolved a staged attack on a US aircraft carrier, killing 3000 military personel. 'Obvious' Iran would be behind the attack, and the US would nuke the country.

[Conan] No really! You can't make this up! [/Conan]
 
Obviousman said:
Can anyone remember some claim on the LC board that there was going to be a nuclear holocaust, or civil war, or NWO takeover or something during OCT / NOV?

They were all talking about how they would prepare for it, etc. I'm sure the date has passed and I just want to gloat....
Click to expand...


Here's JDX's informing on the impending attack on Iran:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15285



Ther was also supposed to be an attack on Chicago based on the fact that emergency drills were being held there and and this fitted in with some numerology or other. Don't forget Alex Jones' bone shattering mega attack to help the neocons win the mid-term elections!
 
sleahead said:
Here's JDX's informing on the impending attack on Iran:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=15285



Ther was also supposed to be an attack on Chicago based on the fact that emergency drills were being held there and and this fitted in with some numerology or other. Don't forget Alex Jones' bone shattering mega attack to help the neocons win the mid-term elections!
Click to expand...

All these things did happen, including the Neocons winning the elections. But the sheeple in the MSM covered it up.
 
Oh great. I went to a Unitarian meeting last week, and folks I liked were taken in by this Looser crap and are thinking there is something to it. :mad: :(

Keep up the good fight. There's still a long way to go.
 


WTF?

These people are a mockery. :mad: :mad: :mad:

Gather observations - evidence
Click to expand...

Yeah, they gather the observations that will fit in their belief, and dismiss the most basic evidence that contradicts their confirmation bias. :mad:

Formulate hypothesis to explain
Click to expand...

Oh, they are really good at that part... :mad:

Experiment to explain hypothesis- data
Click to expand...

Have they ever done any??? :mad:

Refine or reject hypothesis,
Click to expand...

Is this a f*ing joke? :mad: :mad:

more experiments
Click to expand...

Yeah right... I'd like to see those one day. :mad:

Publish in peer-reviewed venues
Click to expand...

Conspiracy theory sites are not considered "peer reviewed venues". :mad:

Repeat above cycle, others join in
Click to expand...

And round and round we go. :mad:

Generate theory - mode of reality
Click to expand...

WHAT??????

:faint:
 
Its really pathetic....don't you know academic fraud....falsifying data are always hallmarks of good research.:boggled:
 
What is pathetic, is that he (Steven Jones) is the most "scientific" of their entire bunch, and he cannot even adhere to his own slide show rules.

He, like the rest of the "scholars" are laughable.

TAM
 
Fixed it for them.

8886455805f7b8473.jpg
 
Pardalis said:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_8886455805f7b8473.jpg[/qimg]

WTF?

These people are a mockery. :mad: :mad: :mad:



Yeah, they gather the observations that will fit in their belief, and dismiss the most basic evidence that contradicts their confirmation bias. :mad:



Oh, they are really good at that part... :mad:



Have they ever done any??? :mad:



Is this a f*ing joke? :mad: :mad:



Yeah right... I'd like to see those one day. :mad:



Conspiracy theory sites are not considered "peer reviewed venues". :mad:



And round and round we go. :mad:



WHAT??????

:faint:
Click to expand...

Compare with
Elements of the scientific method ( hypothetico-deductive):

Induction -- Forming a hypothesis by drawing general conclusions from existing data.

Deduction -- Making specific predictions based on the hypothesis.

Observation -- Gathering data, driven by hypothesis that tell us what to look for in nature.

Verification -- Testing the predictions against further observations to confirm or falsify the initial hypothesis.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Kent1 said:
Here's a new video making the rounds sure to make the CT'ers angry.

Someone states its a dutch documentary showing a novice pilot hitting the Pentagon in a flight sim. I guess its not so tough.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ5zZk9oj6A
Click to expand...

The pilot in that video had no experience except flying small aircraft. He had little practice on the simulator. They did the manouvre three times, all three times they hit the Pentagon. Conclusion in the end: "It's not impossible."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom