Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[mortimer]

A progressive collpase has geometric properties as members fall. We have none of that, we have pulverization that obliterates with its separate delay systems of the floor and cores. The floors with their light weight concrete form a light diffusive cloud and hide the blasts occuring inside when the towers are tall.]/quote]

Prove it, Chris. Show me a "progressive collapse (that) has geometric properties as members fall."

Prove that the "light weight concrete" floors "form a light diffusive cloud", and that said "light diffusive cloud" was not some other material, such as drywall material. Prove it, Chris. Evidence. Not photos. Evidence.

 

[Oliver]

Many people are convinced

*lol* See?





ETA: How many?

 

[firecoins]

Fireloins,

What factures to fall instantly easiest, concrete or steel.

it doesn't mature. According to you, no explaination exists. Nothing will convince you of anything that you don't want it too.

 

[mortimer]

That web site says "no concrete core" because it has nothing to say "steel core columns" except obvious fraudulent info. So it insted works with simple confusion trying to use misintrpretations and selectivity to cut out the solid evidence of the concrete core.

Chris,

The site in question, http://noconcretecore.741.com has just as much evidence as your site. Please show how the info is "fraudulent". Hint: you can't use your site as evidence that this site is fraudulent. You need evidence that wasn't dreamed up by you.

p.s. Chris, have you ever thought that possibly YOU were hypnotized to believe in the concrete core, and not the other billions of people in the world who were hypnotized to think the core was steel? It certainly would be easier to hypnotize one person than billions, and you can't find another person who thinks the core was concrete, nor find a single other person who saw the PBS documentary you claim to have seen.

 

[Christophera]

Chris,

We are talking about the North tower, not the South tower. Please pay attention.

Show me RAW evidence of the North tower's concrete core at elevation in demo photos. After all, that is the evidence you demand of us to prove steel core columns.

The towers were twins except for some diferences in the concrete cores. WTC 1 unfortunately 1 didn't have opportunity for the whole core.

We do have an image of the concrete shear wall and no steel core columns are seen.

The WTC 2 core image is adequate to prove concrete.

 

[Christophera]

Chris,

The site in question, http://noconcretecore.741.com has just as much evidence as your site. Please show how the info is "fraudulent". Hint: you can't use your site as evidence that this site is fraudulent. You need evidence that wasn't dreamed up by you.

p.s. Chris, have you ever thought that possibly YOU were hypnotized to believe in the concrete core, and not the other billions of people in the world who were hypnotized to think the core was steel? It certainly would be easier to hypnotize one person than billions, and you can't find another person who thinks the core was concrete, nor find a single other person who saw the PBS documentary you claim to have seen.

Your plagerized misrepresentations do not show steel core columns, which is my point.

 

[Garb]

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/9-11 Picture5.jpg

I see no concrete, only steel.

 

[Bell]

Conviniently stepping over my post, Christopher?

post

 

[Christophera]

A progressive collpase has geometric properties as members fall. We have none of that, we have pulverization that obliterates with its separate delay systems of the floor and cores. The floors with their light weight concrete form a light diffusive cloud and hide the blasts occuring inside when the towers are tall.

Prove it, Chris. Show me a "progressive collapse (that) has geometric properties as members fall."

Prove that the "light weight concrete" floors "form a light diffusive cloud", and that said "light diffusive cloud" was not some other material, such as drywall material. Prove it, Chris. Evidence. Not photos. Evidence.

How about you find your own image of a progressive collapse. I document demolitions with high explosive and concrete core towers

 

[Garb]

http://www.dukesgloballinks.com/untitled1.jpg

Concrete?

 

[firecoins]

I am still not sure why anyone is trying to prove reality to Christophera. He has already stated nothing will convince him.

 

[Oliver]

I am still not sure why anyone is trying to prove reality to Christophera. He has already stated nothing will convince him.

That´s the problem: Belz said he never
stops until he DID convinced him. Let´s
see who dies first. Literally.

 

[Christophera]

Your answers get more ridicolous the harder you try to worm your way out of all the stupid claims you make. What you just said, makes no sence whatsoever.



Yes, Christophera, very likely... not!



If it is so secret, what RAW evidence do you have of explosives in the towers? Evidence like people admitting to have planted the explosives. No pictures accompanied with your assumptions.

You demand raw evidence of us, I demand it of you. If you cannot provide such evidence, then you are lying. Are you lying, Christophera?

Typical, a denier accusing a truther of what they are doing.

The pilot of flight 11 decided to disobey orders and hit WTC 1 on the north side rather than 2 on the west.

Logical explanation.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1207667

 

[Garb]

Typical, a denier accusing a truther of what they are doing.

The pilot of flight 11 decided to disobey orders and hit WTC 1 on the north side rather than 2 on the west.

Logical explanation.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1207667

Now why exactly would he disobey the orders? Did you talk to the pilot personally beforehand?

 

[Christophera]

http://www.dukesgloballinks.com/untitled1.jpg

Concrete?

Garb,

Do you have what it takes to know which direction the core is and where the camera is pointed?

 

[Bell]

Typical, a denier accusing a truther of what they are doing.

The pilot of flight 11 decided to disobey orders and hit WTC 1 on the north side rather than 2 on the west.

Logical explanation.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1207667

WHAT??!!! AA11 was supposed to hit the south tower on the WEST side? Excuse me, but once again I have to use the laughing dog...



I'm still waiting for RAW evidence, Christophera. Show me the raw evidence that the pilot disobeyed his orders, Show me raw evidence that he was supposed to hit the south tower. Like a written order, a video confession. No assumptions or conclusions. Put up or shut up.

 

[Garb]

Garb,

Do you have what it takes to know which direction the core is and where the camera is pointed?

You failed to comment on my other picture that shows the entire core. No concrete.

 

[Mancman]

I thought i'd repost this exchange from a few months back. Because it's funny.

If there was a hefty concrete core within the WTC in addition to all those steel core columns, how was this landing gear able to go through straight through the centre of WTC1 and take out a perimeter column tree on the south side of the building?

The engines and the landing gear are very close to each other and one engine from each plane punctured the concrete core, both walls as the only projectiles hard enough with enough mass to go through the concrete, The landing gear followed the engine through.

What you were reasonably supposed to do you have not done.

Post an image from the demolitions that shows a steel core column in the core area above ground level.

Christophera, since you seem to love diagrams, I'm sure you'll like this. It took me an entire 4 minutes.

As would have to happen for your theory to be correct.

Your 'following the engine through' theory is ridiculous.
The landing gear alone could not smash through 3 concrete walls and still have the energy to take out the perimeter columns.

Your concrete core theory is null, void. It was a non starter. I hope you can now re-evaluate 9/11, and get on with your life.

The engine punches a hole and there are high strength steel structural elements that connect the engine to the landing gear. The engine drags the landing gear through the hole.

 

[mortimer]

The towers were twins except for some diferences in the concrete cores. WTC 1 unfortunately 1 didn't have opportunity for the whole core.

We do have an image of the concrete shear wall and no steel core columns are seen.

The WTC 2 core image is adequate to prove concrete.

So you cannot prove that the North tower had a concrete core from RAW demo images. Noted.

Using your logic, since there are no images of a concrete core in the North tower from the demo, then there is no concrete core in the North tower.

 

[mortimer]

Your plagerized misrepresentations do not show steel core columns, which is my point.

Mine? Plagerized? Huh?

You cannot show a concrete core in North tower.