Star Wars Beam Weapon and the WTC Bathtub

TruthSeeker1234 said:
Firetruck burned out and windows broken but otherwise undamaged.
Click to expand...

Eng-1_Lad-3.JPG


Looks pretty damaged to me.
 
Wow, sorry about the size of the picture, I'll have to learn to resize.
 
uk_dave said:
How did that firetuck come to be described as 'burned out'?
Click to expand...

It wasn't described as "burned out". It was taken by my brother-in-law (FDNY) on 9/12. I'm not even sure if it's even ever appeared on the Internet before. I posted it to show TS that there was a LOT of damage to vehicles not caused by fire, but rather from tons of falling debris.

This is the first time I've tried to post a photo on this message board. I'll resize it and try again.
 
Horatius said:
So, if 80% of the upper parts of the towers were turned into fine dust, what did the study of the composition of the dust find so little iron:

Fe-rich Primarily Fe and Fe oxide 0.2 – 1.3 0.1 – 1.1

Compare to the amounts of Gypsum:

Gypsum Includes all Ca sulfate particles 26.3 – 53.3 63.3 – 63.7

(first range is percentage for outdoor samples, second for indoor, see table on page 5)

So are you saying the towers contained gypsum in an amount between 25 and 50 times the amount of iron(steel)?

Or maybe your 20% of the steel left number is just a tad off?
Click to expand...

These are the same people who told us that the air was safe to breathe. So you expect me to believe that they told the truth about the dust, after they told such a viscious lie about the dust? What on earth would it take to convince you that these people are liars?
 
Alt+F4 said:
It wasn't described as "burned out". It was taken by my brother-in-law (FDNY) on 9/12. I'm not even sure if it's even ever appeared on the Internet before. I posted it to show TS that there was a LOT of damage to vehicles not caused by fire, but rather from tons of falling debris.

This is the first time I've tried to post a photo on this message board. I'll resize it and try again.
Click to expand...

AltF4, are you trying to be disingenuous? That is a different firetruck. It is an interesting photo however. Did you read the paper and study the photos that are the subject of this thread?
 
Image180.jpg


Here's the truck that has the windows blown out but is otherwise undamaged. The Wood/Reynolds paper has a multitude of very strange photos. Look at them. They are very difficult to explain.

I would love you guys to explain them. You don't need to know where any of these vehicles were. Imagine they were anywere you'd like to imagine. Then explain how, for instance, the front door panel of a police car is melted, but the rear door panel is pristine. How does that happen?
 
Last edited:
TruthSeeker1234 said:
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image180.jpg

Here's the truck that has the windows blown out but is otherwise undamaged. The Wood/Reynolds paper has a multitude of very strange photos. Look at them. They are very difficult to explain.

I would love you guys to explain them. You don't need to know where any of these vehicles were. Imagine they were anywere you'd like to imagine. Then explain how, for instance, the front door panel of a police car is melted, but the rear door panel is pristine. How does that happen?
Click to expand...

How does that picture prove anything the CTs are saying?

How is it not logical that a collapsing building could have caused that?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image180.jpg

Here's the truck that has the windows blown out but is otherwise undamaged. The Wood/Reynolds paper has a multitude of very strange photos. Look at them. They are very difficult to explain.

I would love you guys to explain them. You don't need to know where any of these vehicles were. Imagine they were anywere you'd like to imagine. Then explain how, for instance, the front door panel of a police car is melted, but the rear door panel is pristine. How does that happen?
Click to expand...
maybe all that debris that fell on it had something to do with it

what do YOU think did it?
 
Did falling debris do this?
Image172.jpg


Please explain how the "collapse" melted the front door and removed the door handle, yet left the back door panel pristine. Can't wait to hear this.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Did falling debris do this?http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image172.jpg

Please explain how the "collapse" melted the front door and removed the door handle, yet left the back door panel pristine. Can't wait to hear this.
Click to expand...
the door doesnt look melted, it looks crushed (you know, by debris)

the removed dor handle? the handles are plastic, plastic melts

for the front door being burned and not the back, did it even occur to you that maybe the dor was open while it was on fire?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
AltF4, are you trying to be disingenuous? That is a different firetruck. It is an interesting photo however. Did you read the paper and study the photos that are the subject of this thread?
Click to expand...

You do not mean the paper by Judy Woods the insane idiot from planet x ward at the Clemson funny farm?

Why read real dumb ideas from the team most likely to be sent to the funny farm.

The real question here is did you read the article?

And do you believe the article?

If you do believe, has your wife talked to you about you being committed?

Is she too busy at work while you are believing insane CT ideas?

If you have any evidence of a beam weapon bring it on.

Take a break you mind is toasted to even post this toasted beam weapon, except as a parody of the CT experts.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Did falling debris do this?

Please explain how the "collapse" melted the front door and removed the door handle, yet left the back door panel pristine. Can't wait to hear this.
Click to expand...

it was a beam weapon,

darn i was wrong

you are right it was a beam weapon, bounce off the glass of the wtc and blasted the car, and the officers were destroyed in a flash
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Did falling debris do this?http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image172.jpg

Please explain how the "collapse" melted the front door and removed the door handle, yet left the back door panel pristine. Can't wait to hear this.
Click to expand...

How do you know that this car was melted?

Have you any idea what happened to this car?

Have you spoken to the police department about this car?

Have you checked anything out about this car?

Is it not possible a car full of petrol simply caught fire when large chunks of debris fell on it?

What happened to the policemen that were in this car? Have you checked up? Can you offer up their testimony?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Did falling debris do this?[qimg]http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image172.jpg[/qimg]

Please explain how the "collapse" melted the front door and removed the door handle, yet left the back door panel pristine. Can't wait to hear this.
Click to expand...

Perhaps the door was open when it caught fire, then when they relocated it they closed the door.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
OK. The door was open. Now, the really strange stuff. What about all the circular holes? a giant drill press?
Click to expand...

What does the fact that the holes are circular have to do with anything?

I'd be more confused if they were triangles.
 
Got any better pics of the holes?

Dimensions?

What was in them?

Colour?

Aroma?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
AltF4, are you trying to be disingenuous? That is a different firetruck. It is an interesting photo however. Did you read the paper and study the photos that are the subject of this thread?
Click to expand...
Yes, I know it's a different fire truck. I posted it to make the point that not all vehicles had fire damage, many had debris damage only.

As for the photos in the Woods/Reynolds paper, you are assuming that the fire damage was caused right when the towers collapsed. Fires burned at ground zero for weeks after 9/11 and you don't know when those photos were taken. I know for a FACT that the photo I posted was taken on 9/12.

Putting out vechicle fires was not a priority in the first few days, searching for survivors was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom