• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bell said:
*snip* .... proof like some people admitting planting it there.
Click to expand...

All his splitted personalities did agree with him. So there
are a lot, i mean A LOT of people who agree with him. :D
 
Christophera said:
Notice no one built a web site to document the steel core columns with raw evidence but I built one using raw evidence to substantiate the steel reinforced concrete core and it is substantiated and consistent with links to universities, Ph.D's and other credible, disinterested sources.
Click to expand...

i think everyone should check out the site below. it has astonishing information regarding the true core composition.........

LOOK HERE NOW!

:-}

BV
 
Big Chief Running Gerbil is my uncle, he has gone missing since he made that statement.
 
Regnad Kcin said:
Though I had bid you adieu with my last post, I'll address your towers-fell-in-the-wrong-order inaccuracy. I suspect it'll be for naught, but what the hey.

First, I was attempting to walk you through the simple deductive process when I initially engaged you on the matter. But your general unresponsiveness proved continually taxing. Then, when you returned after your suspension (not "ban," as you lied on the physorg forum), you continued your difficult manner.
Click to expand...

Curious how an administrative error or oversite in unsuspending me after a 3 day suspension which looks to me after a couple of weeks like a ban, is suddenly my fault and I am a liar.

It certainly appears as though you are distorting the situation.

Regnad Kcin said:
But let's get to it.

The 110-story WTC 1 was struck first by a Boeing 767 at approx. 490 mph. The floors damaged were between 93 and 99. This left 11 undamaged stories above. The tower fell 102 minutes after impact.

The 110-story WTC 2 was subsequently struck by a Boeing 767 at approx. 590 mph. The floors damaged were between 77 and 85. This left 25 undamaged stories above. The tower fell 56 minutes after impact.

Please don't tell me I have to explain this any further.
Click to expand...

OMG!

You totally left out that WTC 2 was more seriously damaged by impact and fire than was WTC 1. That is not logical. It is logical that WTC one would fall first.
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
Curious how an administrative error or oversite in unsuspending me after a 3 day suspension which looks to me after a couple of weeks like a ban, is suddenly my fault an I am a liar.
Click to expand...


That's liar spellt N-U-T-S


You totally left out that WTC 2 was more seriously damaged by impact and fire than was WTC 1. That is not logical. It is logical that WTC one would fall first.
Click to expand...

You're in no position to question anyone else's grasp of logic, mate.

THere's not a single person here who agrees with you. Hell, you can't find a single person anywhere to agree. So either you're a unique genius (aye, right!) or nuts. Make your own mind up; I know that we all have.
 
Chris; given the date, a bit of advice - do play near the bonfire, and do return to fireworks once they're lit......


(poor taste, I know, but it would get us some peace).

OMG! C4 Coated fireworks!!! (boom)
 
Bell said:
And you still have not explained why the collapse of the towers started at the point of impact of the planes, even though the planes hit the wrong towers.
Click to expand...

As was peabodys illogical answer lost in the deniers spam, my answer to the above question was lost.

Even though the planes hit the wrong towers, the pilots knew each others targets and they were told that explosives were planted on those floors which would cause more damage if hit. Pilots knowing each others targets is S.O.P.


Bell said:
You also failed to give us proof of explosives placed in the towers, proof like some people admitting planting it there.
Click to expand...

Due to secrecy the addmissions you request will not be forthcoming. However, forensically, with logic, we can conclude that only optimally placed and optimally distributed high explosives detonated in a high speed series could create this event.

Cutting steel core columns would appear completely different as the density of steel requires massive charges.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3957&stc=1&d=1162750071
 

Attachments

  • corefacesexploding.jpg
    corefacesexploding.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 0
Architect said:
That's liar spellt N-U-T-S

You're in no position to question anyone else's grasp of logic, mate.

THere's not a single person here who agrees with you. Hell, you can't find a single person anywhere to agree. So either you're a unique genius (aye, right!) or nuts. Make your own mind up; I know that we all have.
Click to expand...

If you can conduct logic you failed to do so when you didn't explain how steel core columns resist torsion more than a square frame of shear walls and how steel core columns can logically be an improvement on the stability of a tower with a 6.5:1 height to base ratio. Therefore you lost credibility as actually being an architect.

Maybe you can get a job in a deli. There are plenty of recipes in this thread left by deniers witout evidence working to obsufucate.
 
Oliver said:
But in the end we will beat him. I mean he´s about 57 years
old and most of us are much younger... :D



Muhahawawaw... Your thread was my guide to learn what spam means.... :D
Click to expand...

But at what a cost of bandwidth.
 
Architect said:
Chris; given the date, a bit of advice - do play near the bonfire, and do return to fireworks once they're lit......
(poor taste, I know, but it would get us some peace).
OMG! C4 Coated fireworks!!! (boom)
Click to expand...

the gunpowder plot........now that was a REAL conspiracy. poor old guy, burned to death a million times every november. as if he didn't suffer enough already.

BV
 
Christophera said:
If you can conduct logic you failed to do so when you didn't explain how steel core columns resist torsion more than a square frame of shear walls and how steel core columns can logically be an improvement on the stability of a tower with a 6.5:1 height to base ratio. Therefore you lost credibility as actually being an architect.

Maybe you can get a job in a deli. There are plenty of recipes in this thread left by deniers witout evidence working to obsufucate.
Click to expand...

Had a job in a deli, din't like the sauces.

Talking torsion and shear is a real come on.

Square peg in a round hole, no?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom