Larry Silversteins insurance

VespaGuy said:
Wildcat - I think you misunderstand me. I was mocking Docker. Sorry if it was in bad taste, but i wasn't accusing Silverstein of anything. I am not a CT.
Click to expand...


I think WildCat confused you with Docker because of your Avatar.

-Gumboot
 
Docker said:
I heard thw wtc was losing to begin with. Less and less office space was being rented. Larry is definitely pushing his luck with this 2 event scenario. It's a scam.
Click to expand...

You "heard" this from CT sites, which are dead wrong. As usual.

Try doing some actual research for a change. So far, you've done nothing but spout nonsense for 600+ posts in less than 3 days.

You seem to think this is a game.

Here's a hint: it is not.

And, as I said above, there is a summary of the insurance policies and the court decisions here:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.p...light=insurers

It's only 14 posts long - even you should be able to manage it.
 
Last edited:
Docker said:
I heard thw wtc was losing to begin with. Less and less office space was being rented. Larry is definitely pushing his luck with this 2 event scenario. It's a scam.
Click to expand...

If it were a scam he wouldn't waste his money on a venture which wouldn't be profitable, that doesn't make any sense.
 
Anyone want to start a pool about which topic Docker will start a thread about when he runs from this one?
 
That would be like Pete Rose betting on games he's playing in, sorry no.
 
Docker said:
I don't think I would want to work in that building now.
Click to expand...

That's the point. How many people would want to work in WTC 7? Or in the future WTC for that matter? What is Silverstein gaining from all of this?
 
Docker said:
If two men come into your house and steal your property, do you claim double insurance because 2 men did it not 1?
Click to expand...

If two airplanes hit one tower, yes.

The proper analogy would be. A landlord owns two buildings adjacent to each other. His house is ransacked, then later his next door property is ransacked by another evil doer.
 
Anti-sophist said:
http://911myths.com/html/windfall.html

Next.
Click to expand...


Really?

Maybe you should read a little more about the deal:

The lease agreement applied to World Trade Center Buildings One, Two, Four and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet of retail space. Silverstein put up only $14 million of his own money.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1030343783307


How much did that ole insurance company give him again? Wasn't there something about liberty bonds and the Port Authority taking over one of the towers also?
 
Crungy said:
If two airplanes hit one tower, yes.

The proper analogy would be. A landlord owns two buildings adjacent to each other. His house is ransacked, then later his next door property is ransacked by another evil doer.
Click to expand...

Perhaps even better would be one house you own starts on fire, and the house you own immediately nextdoor catches fire from the first house.
 
Skeptic4Sure said:
Really?

Maybe you should read a little more about the deal:

The lease agreement applied to World Trade Center Buildings One, Two, Four and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet of retail space. Silverstein put up only $14 million of his own money.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1030343783307


How much did that ole insurance company give him again? Wasn't there something about liberty bonds and the Port Authority taking over one of the towers also?
Click to expand...

Dude! Where have you been? Hiding from the gummit?
 
Bell said:
That's the point. How many people would want to work in WTC 7? Or in the future WTC for that matter? What is Silverstein gaining from all of this?
Click to expand...

You wouldn't dare smoke in case global collapse ensued
 
I wonder why, if it is such a slam-dunk fact that the WTCs were brought down by CD, why aren't the insurance companies looking into it?

I would imagine that even a hint of a problem, with all that money at stake, would get any insurance company's attention.

Is there any evidence of insurance companies questioning the official story?
 
So, are you backing off of the claims made in your opening post, Docker, now that you've been given the facts?

Just want to be clear here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom