• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Larry Silversteins insurance

VespaGuy said:
Are we still playing "just asking questions"? Can I play, too?

If Larry Silverstein is involved in a conspiracy plot that's so obvious that even children on the internet can see that WTC7 fell "at free fall speed", why is the insurance company paying him at all? Why isn't he arrested for insurance fraud?

This is fun!!
Click to expand...
I don't suppose there's any chance you'll read my paper on WTC 7, which you said you would do? You'd save yourself a lot of embarrassment.

By the way, the reason that some of the insurers have to pay double is that's what their policies say. The courts agreed.
 
Last edited:
VespaGuy said:
Are we still playing "just asking questions"? Can I play, too?
Click to expand...
That's all you've ever played. You have no interest in the answers though, do you?
If Larry Silverstein is involved in a conspiracy plot
Click to expand...
He's not.
that's so obvious that even children on the internet can see that WTC7 fell "at free fall speed",
Click to expand...
It didn't.
why is the insurance company paying him at all?
Click to expand...
He paid the premiums.
Why isn't he arrested for insurance fraud?
Click to expand...
There was no fraud.

This is fun!!
Click to expand...
Accusing a man of the deaths of nearly 3,000 people w/o any evidence is fun for you? How utterly despicable.
 
I'm just saying if Larry wasn't being accused by 9/11 CTs then i'm sure you would agree he was a slimebag claiming twice what the policy is worse. I don't think Larry blew the building up ok?
 
Bell said:
LOL, I almost made the same mistake. Damn that Alex Jones!
Click to expand...

I did too :D In fact, I even almost said "That's all you've ever played. You have no interest in the answers though, do you?" exactly.
 
Docker said:
I'm just saying if Larry wasn't being accused by 9/11 CTs then i'm sure you would agree he was a slimebag claiming twice what the policy is worse.
Click to expand...

No. There were 23-24 policies involved. Those that were written in a certain way were interpreted one way; those that were written differently were interpreted another way. All in accordance with the law and in accordance with their terms.

Sheesh. I already pointed you to a concise summary - you could at least try to understand the facts before you go off half cocked, yet again.
 
Last edited:
Bell said:
LOL, I almost made the same mistake.
Click to expand...

Me too! :eek:

Anyways, Silverstein is not only strapped for cash to rebuild the complex, but he is also risking putting a lot of money into a project that might not work out as profitable - that area has been economically devastated ever since 9/11, and many businesses there are suffering - an episode of Penn & Teller's Bullsh*t! covered this story nicely. Other businesses that might have been interested in the area have gone and set themselves up in other places that aren't waiting to be rebuilt.
 
WildCat said:
That's all you've ever played. You have no interest in the answers though, do you?

He's not.

It didn't.

He paid the premiums.

There was no fraud.


Accusing a man of the deaths of nearly 3,000 people w/o any evidence is fun for you? How utterly despicable.
Click to expand...

Wildcat - I think you misunderstand me. I was mocking Docker. Sorry if it was in bad taste, but i wasn't accusing Silverstein of anything. I am not a CT.
 
Josh Redstone said:
Me too! :eek:

Anyways, Silverstein is not only strapped for cash to rebuild the complex, but he is also risking putting a lot of money into a project that might not work out as profitable - that area has been economically devastated ever since 9/11, and many businesses there are suffering - an episode of Penn & Teller's Bullsh*t! covered this story nicely. Other businesses that might have been interested in the area have gone and set themselves up in other places that aren't waiting to be rebuilt.
Click to expand...


I heard thw wtc was losing to begin with. Less and less office space was being rented. Larry is definitely pushing his luck with this 2 event scenario. It's a scam.
 
Sorry for all the confusion, folks. Before I get myself into trouble, I think I'll change my avatar.
 
Gravy said:
I don't suppose there's any chance you'll read my paper on WTC 7, which you said you would do? You'd save yourself a lot of embarrassment.

By the way, the reason that some of the insurers have to pay double is that's what their policies say. The courts agreed.
Click to expand...

You're probably right, Gravy, the Docker won't read your excellent paper on WTC7. Too many facts and too much evidence, which are anathema to CTers, apparently. It's much easier for them to maintain their delusions when they are not confronted with reality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom