• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Look at this collapse

of course there 2 building in NYC with steel core contrsuction. Both were destroyed in terrorist attacks on the same date. What a coincidence! Maybe it was a conspiracy!

Lots of buildings have that construction now. The core of the building could never be described as a hollow steel shaft.
 
Compared to the building the fires were tiny

The building was very, very large. That does not make the fires 'tiny'. A lot of folks jumped out windows to avoid the fires you call 'tiny'. A lot of folks were trapped by the those fires you called 'tiny'.

A building was destroyed by the fires you call 'tiny' (and the impact of the plane).
 
Compared to the building the fires were tiny
Even the ones that engulfed entire floors? You realize that's one whole acre on fire right there. That's "tiny"?

I think you've watched too many videos online and have truly forgotten the scale of the event. It's easy to look at the towers on your monitor when they're both an inch and a half wide and say, "Boy, the fires don't look that bad from here."

But they were.
 
Does this look like a hollow steel shaft? Does it look like a bit of fire would make it break into a million pieces?http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc1_core.jpg
The fire didn't make it break into a million pieces, which you would know if you had read the NIST report.

I asked you this in another thread but you didn't answer. Docker, what was the mechanism of collapse in the towers, according to NIST?

Oh, and what do you get out of lying about the events of 9/11? There must be some personal benefit for you in behaving like this. What is it?

Just asking questions and demanding answers.
 
Lots of buildings have that construction now. The core of the building could never be described as a hollow steel shaft.
Dude, you're arguing semantics right now. Even if the PM guy said what you say he said, it's irrelevant. He misspoke. You can't spell. Hey! No one's perfect.

We're all aware of the core columns.

What. Is. Your. [Rule8]ing. Point.
 
Compared to the building the fires were tiny

Docker, why do you lie about the events of 9/11?

8790453a3a857b6c3.jpg


87904509e0b508441.jpg

 
The fire didn't make it break into a million pieces, which you would know if you had read the NIST report.

I asked you this in another thread but you didn't answer. Docker, what was the mechanism of collapse in the towers, according to NIST?

Oh, and what do you get out of lying about the events of 9/11? There must be some personal benefit for you in behaving like this. What is it?

Just asking questions and demanding answers.

You're in no position to demand anything from me. Deal with it.

I am not lying.
 
Docker, why do you lie about the events of 9/11?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790453a3a857b6c3.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/87904509e0b508441.jpg[/qimg]
Here's a glass of water Gravy. See if you can't put that out.

.... Thanks.
 
You're in no position to demand anything from me. Deal with it.

So you are a coward and a liar. You can't dish it out and you sure as heck can't take it.

I am not lying.

Yes, you are. You've made several untrue statements knowing they were untrue. That makes you a liar. Simple as that.
 

Right in your picture of the building burning, the fires are uneven. So please explain how that caused a symmetrical, total and fast collapse destroying everything. Steel fails slowly. Even in an earthquaske total collapse doesn't happen that way. If you believe that, you are gullible.
 
I stopped reading the thread at page 4. Docker, you haven't provided a shred of evidence so far. Where is it?

I smell troll.
 

Back
Top Bottom