"Bit of fire"....
That's like saying an ice cube and a litre of water sunk the Titanic.
Compared to the building the fires were tiny
"Bit of fire"....
That's like saying an ice cube and a litre of water sunk the Titanic.
of course there 2 building in NYC with steel core contrsuction. Both were destroyed in terrorist attacks on the same date. What a coincidence! Maybe it was a conspiracy!I looked on google images and searched for hollow steel shaft. No buildings, just lots of pictures like this:
http://www.carbonxtreme.com/catalog/images/carbonxtreme/CX00-100-601_tn.jpg
It looks like an airplane flying at the speed of a shotgon blast might damage it, yeah
didn't need to. When is that science backround you been accussed of lying about going to kick in?But does it like every joint would break and it would be completely flattened? No.
of course there 2 building in NYC with steel core contrsuction. Both were destroyed in terrorist attacks on the same date. What a coincidence! Maybe it was a conspiracy!
Compared to the building the fires were tiny
Even the ones that engulfed entire floors? You realize that's one whole acre on fire right there. That's "tiny"?Compared to the building the fires were tiny
Compared to the building the fires were tiny
The core of the building could never be described as a hollow steel shaft.
The fire didn't make it break into a million pieces, which you would know if you had read the NIST report.Does this look like a hollow steel shaft? Does it look like a bit of fire would make it break into a million pieces?http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc1_core.jpg
Dude, you're arguing semantics right now. Even if the PM guy said what you say he said, it's irrelevant. He misspoke. You can't spell. Hey! No one's perfect.Lots of buildings have that construction now. The core of the building could never be described as a hollow steel shaft.
What. Is. Your. [Rule8]ing. Point.
Compared to the building the fires were tiny
The fire didn't make it break into a million pieces, which you would know if you had read the NIST report.
I asked you this in another thread but you didn't answer. Docker, what was the mechanism of collapse in the towers, according to NIST?
Oh, and what do you get out of lying about the events of 9/11? There must be some personal benefit for you in behaving like this. What is it?
Just asking questions and demanding answers.
Here's a glass of water Gravy. See if you can't put that out.Docker, why do you lie about the events of 9/11?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790453a3a857b6c3.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/87904509e0b508441.jpg[/qimg]
You're in no position to demand anything from me. Deal with it.
I am not lying.
Docker, why do you lie about the events of 9/11?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790453a3a857b6c3.jpg
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/87904509e0b508441.jpg