Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Bell]

Yes, but did you use LSD?

 

[firecoins]

Read the survivors accounts and you will see that each tower had special training for the fire marshalls for each floor. The towers cores were so different that specific training for evacuations was required for the the different towers.

Oh, you have a problem with reading. You may never know the truth.

No. Many of those who died went to the roof thinking that a helicopter evacuation would take place when no such thing was in the cards.

Your concret core theory has clearly been debunked. They were steel core buildings. The picutres during construction clearly show this. Your images of the destruction do not show a concrete core. Sorry.

 

[Christophera]

Dear Christophera:

There were not and never have been concrete cores in the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Please seek the professional help that you so desperately and so obviously require.

Love,
The Rest of the World.

You are a child when it comes to knowledge of the mind. So is psychology. Why? Arrested development, why? The APA was fonded by a skull and bones member. Hearsay, but I believe it after my continues experiences.

In the punctuation of the below letter, it is implied that the director of the "Ethics Department" left because of my letter and evidence to the APA.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3741&stc=1&d=1161659685

 

[Christophera]

No. Many of those who died went to the roof thinking that a helicopter evacuation would take place when no such thing was in the cards.

Your concret core theory has clearly been debunked. They were steel core buildings. The picutres during construction clearly show this. Your images of the destruction do not show a concrete core. Sorry.

A bogus spam denial post if there ever was one.

No evidence, typical juvenile social denial.

With one image it is proven there was no steel core columns and that there was a concrete core.

 

[LashL]

Seriously, Chris, get help. You really, truly, absolutely, without question, require professional help. I've read your various websites in great detail and I understand that you have had poor results in your prior attempts at seeking help, but that is because you were not actually seeking help.

"They" are not out to get you. "They" are not complicit in your problems. "They" are not trying to hide the "truth" from the world. "They" have not manipulated your mind. "They" have not hypnotized you. And there have never been concrete cores in the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Get help. You really, really need it if you ever hope to function rationally in the world.

 

[Gravy]

Ahem.

​

 

[TheFeds]

Oh, you have a problem with reading. You may never know the truth.

You're the one who searches the internet for the phrase "concrete core", and, without actually reading the results, posts them as references. Then you run and hide when someone points out that most of the references you cited are either bogus, or referring to a "steel and concrete core" composed of concrete fireproofing sprayed onto steel columns.

So, really, I'm not the one with a reading problem...but wait, I've got proof. Actually, you provided the proof, just now:

In the punctuation of the below letter, it is implied that the director of the "Ethics Department" left because of my letter and evidence to the APA.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3741&stc=1&d=1161659685

That letter says "I had referred your letter originally to our Ethics Department . . . the director left and regrettably you never received a response."

Two facts are presented in that sentence:

1. She referred your letter to the Ethics Department.
2. The director left.

You did not receive a response, probably because there was no director to respond. But at no time does she suggest that fact 1 and fact 2 exist in a cause-effect relationship. If you don't understand why this is (it's called logic, and if the ancient Greeks knew a thing or two about it, you damned well ought to as well), it is you that is the "child".

Your reading comprehension skills are inadequate. Perhaps you were dropped as a child. Perhaps you ate too many paint chips, while your parents were neglecting you. Perhaps you were too busy talking to the Mohawks in your class to pay any attention to school. Whatever your sad story is, you need to invest in some remediation, so that you don't go around embarrassing yourself with lapses of logic born out of an inability to read short sentences, and assimilate their meanings.

 

[Christophera]

You're the one who searches the internet for the phrase "concrete core", and, without actually reading the results, posts them as references. Then you run and hide when someone points out that most of the references you cited are either bogus, or referring to a "steel and concrete core" composed of concrete fireproofing sprayed onto steel columns.

Again, you are not reading.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

NOTE: This page has some confusion mentioning multiple, concrete clad cores.

You can be fair and selective when reviewing sources and say so as I have done. You cannot be fair in review, as you have done, of a site that has already sourced and reviewed and selected sources with reasonable comment as I have.

My point, which you have conpletely ignored, which my notes underline, is that WHEN the concrete core IS REFERRED to, it is done so consistently. You completely ignore the fact that these sources are uninterested on way or the other.

 

[RandFan]

Because there is no other reasonable explanation for what is seen.

This isn't evidence and it most certainly isn't compelling. To the rest of us there is no other reasonable explanation for your conclusion. None at all. On top of that there is a boat load of evidence that you ware wrong. You have not produced any evidence to corroborate your assertions.

 

[Christophera]

So, really, I'm not the one with a reading problem...but wait, I've got proof. Actually, you provided the proof, just now:
That letter says "I had referred your letter originally to our Ethics Department . . . the director left and regrettably you never received a response."

Two facts are presented in that sentence:

1. She referred your letter to the Ethics Department.
2. The director left.

You did not receive a response, probably because there was no director to respond. But at no time does she suggest that fact 1 and fact 2 exist in a cause-effect relationship. If you don't understand why this is (it's called logic, and if the ancient Greeks knew a thing or two about it, you damned well ought to as well), it is you that is the "child".

Your reading comprehension skills are inadequate. Perhaps you were dropped as a child. Perhaps you ate too many paint chips, while your parents were neglecting you. Perhaps you were too busy talking to the Mohawks in your class to pay any attention to school. Whatever your sad story is, you need to invest in some remediation, so that you don't go around embarrassing yourself with lapses of logic born out of an inability to read short sentences, and assimilate their meanings.

You might be able to read, but you are not going to learn anything without reading beteen the lines.

In casual conversation the punctuation would mean that the director of the ethics department left because of what I had written and evidenced. I folowed up on the reference that the senior director of the APA provided to find that I was answered by a psychologist from Washington State U that engaged in a series of bogus cognitive distortions.

You need to read, think and do something instead of dissing others efforts that are well founded in needs.

We need to figue out what is happening in our government. You are not helping the people, you are helping the infiltraors with your current line of action.

 

[Christophera]

This isn't evidence and it most certainly isn't compelling. To the rest of us there is no other reasonable explanation for your conclusion. None at all. On top of that there is a boat load of evidence that you ware wrong. You have not produced any evidence to corroborate your assertions.

And you know what. Your post isn't a complete communication. I have no idea of what you are referring to without going back and redetermining the context of what you quoted. Try again.

 

[Christophera]

Seriously, Chris, get help. You really, truly, absolutely, without question, require professional help. I've read your various websites in great detail and I understand that you have had poor results in your prior attempts at seeking help, but that is because you were not actually seeking help.

"They" are not out to get you. "They" are not complicit in your problems. "They" are not trying to hide the "truth" from the world. "They" have not manipulated your mind. "They" have not hypnotized you. And there have never been concrete cores in the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Get help. You really, really need it if you ever hope to function rationally in the world.

Helping the infiltrators of the US government is not going to help you or anybody else. The infiltrators already "GOT" 3,000 Americans and are using you to try to create a situation where they can get more.

You are supporting lawlessness.

And, ........ you certainly cannot prove there were steel core columns in the towers. But I can prove there were not, and I've got very strong evidence that there was a concrete core.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

 

[Christophera]

The picutres during construction clearly show this. Your images of the destruction do not show a concrete core. Sorry.

When you say this and do not post the image link you are being lame.

 

[alexg]

Chris,

If the other CTs that come here had one one thousandth of your stubborness and your thick skin they might actually be trouble. I am actually a little thankfull the most determined one of all has chosen the least compelling argument. You do take the cake.

 

[LashL]

Helping the infiltrators of the US government is not going to help you or anybody else. The infiltrators already "GOT" 3,000 Americans and are using you to try to create a situation where they can get more.

You are supporting lawlessness.

No, Chris, none of what you have said here is even remotely close to reality. You really need help, and you should seek it out forthwith.

Seriously.

"They" are not out to get you. "They" are not complicit in your problems. "They" are not trying to hide the "truth" from the world. "They" have not manipulated your mind. "They" have not hypnotized you. And there have never been concrete cores in the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Please seek and obtain the assistance that you so obviously and so desperately require.

There were not and never have never been concrete cores in the twin towers. This is indisputable. Your assertions to the contrary, and all of your personal websites, are wholly delusional.

Please seek help.

 

[Oliver]

I´m a Jellyfish Cook and i smell Jellyfish in this thread. Therefore it was a Jellyfish-Core or Christophera is a Jellyfish.

 

[Oliver]

Helping the infiltrators of the US government is not going to help you or anybody else. The infiltrators already "GOT" 3,000 Americans and are using you to try to create a situation where they can get more.

You are supporting lawlessness.

And, ........ you certainly cannot prove there were steel core columns in the towers. But I can prove there were not, and I've got very strong evidence that there was a concrete core.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

Some in the UK still think the WTC tower core was built as shown below. Basically a pre-stressed concrete design. Yamasaki had reviewed the design, and found no contractor that could build a 1,300 foot column of that design. We all know the towers had their stairwells and elevators inside the core. There is no room for that in the core below.

 

[Christophera]

Some in the UK still think the WTC tower core was built as shown below. Basically a pre-stressed concrete design. Yamasaki had reviewed the design, and found no contractor that could build a 1,300 foot column of that design. We all know the towers had their stairwells and elevators inside the core. There is no room for that in the core below.

So what are your trying to say Ollie?

 

[Oliver]

So what are your trying to say Ollie?

The Core was made of Jellyfish. Can´t you see. Chrissilie?

 

[Christophera]

Chris,

If the other CTs that come here had one one thousandth of your stubborness and your thick skin they might actually be trouble. I am actually a little thankfull the most determined one of all has chosen the least compelling argument. You do take the cake.

I know for absolute certain of the concrete core. I have proof no steel core columns existed and the same documentary that showed me the concrete core also gave me all teh clues I need to assemble the only web site on the planet that actually provides a feasible and realistic explanation for near free fall and total pulverizaton.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

The other truth seekers just do not know what I know. If they did, they would be right here with me, well some, the ones with courage.