• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
The explosive circuits were interrupted by intelligent caring, courageous Mohawks that figured out wtf was happening. Imagine how impossible it would be to convince anyone if that one chunk of the core wasn't left.
Click to expand...

WOW!. Where's the evidence for that whopper? Since the buildings came down I'd say that the circuit interruption was unsuccessful. Jesus-in-a-hand-basket! how you lie so. And terribly so!

So your saying the the picture where you pointed out the 17 foot concrete core is a lie? If it isin't then show where the concrete core is:
 

Attachments

  • 5435.jpg
    5435.jpg
    155.1 KB · Views: 5
Christophera said:
Only one probelm homey. The text reasonably fits the raw evidence.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
Click to expand...

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.htm
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

Hey, just some more times posting this link and it will become true.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
 

Attachments

  • 5435.jpg
    5435.jpg
    155.1 KB · Views: 3
Christophera said:
The explosive circuits were interrupted by intelligent caring, courageous Mohawks that figured out wtf was happening. Imagine how impossible it would be to convince anyone if that one chunk of the core wasn't left.
Click to expand...
Mohawks? What are you talking about? Where's the raw evidence of Mohawk involvement? (There's something disturbingly absurd about that...more so than usual, despite the nature of this thread.)


Also, you missed this. It would be wonderful if you could shed some light on the questions posed there.
 
Oliver said:
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.htm
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

Hey, just some more times posting this link and it will become true.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
Click to expand...

It was true before I made the site and you posted redundant colored links to it. This image shows the concrete shear wall of the core holding up the spire reinforcing the truth further.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3689&stc=1&d=1161498986
 

Attachments

  • corewallspirearrows.gif
    corewallspirearrows.gif
    28.9 KB · Views: 3
TheFeds said:
If you refer to him as "homer", can I refer to you a "bleeding virgin"?
Click to expand...

Oh, I forgot to address this one question. If I used a name like gravy or something then you could call me whatever. Since I use my real name that would not be proportionate. Who else would sabotage the explosive circuit besides those that have been watching the infiltrators since the beginning.

I addressed your questions by posting silhouettes of the towers that are also seen on this page.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11corexplosions.html
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
It was true before I made the site and you posted redundant colored links to it. This image shows the concrete shear wall of the core holding up the spire reinforcing the truth further.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3689&stc=1&d=1161498986
Click to expand...
This image shows nothing of value, because it's 168 pixels wide, and taken through a cloud of smoke and dust. When will you learn that grey ≠ concrete? Show your calculations for determining the minimum size of a resolvable object (using the method that I've previously demonstrated, or any logical method).

Christophera said:
Oh, I forgot to address this one question. If I used a name like gravy or something then you could call me whatever. Since I use my real name that would not be proportionate. Who else would sabotage the explosive circuit besides those that have been watching the infiltrators since the beginning.

I addressed your questions by posting silhouettes of the towers that are also seen on this page.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11corexplosions.html
Click to expand...
And by "Who else", you mean the Mohawks? Seriously?

Look, I know that many Mohawks were ironworkers, but the fact that there were Mohawks present does not necessarily mean that they sabotaged any particular circuit. Coincidence is not raw evidence.

By the way, I inadvertently linked to a previous post above; it's since been edited to reflect what I intended: this. It's the one which describes how your core drawing (featured prominently on your site) doesn't even correspond to your own pictures of the WTC at sunrise.
 

Let me sing it for you:

It does not mahahahahtter... In the end you lose...
​

11107451f109db90e3.gif


​
 
Christophera said:
Do you misunderstand things on purpose? Those relatives will think less of that than me laughing at those who term an obvious explosion a collapse.

I stand for justice by acknowleging the truth with reason, they will like that. I stand for using truth to protect the living. They will like that too.
Click to expand...

What is there to misunderstand about

Christophera said:
The notion that this is a collapse is laughable, literally.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3665&d=1161464673
Click to expand...

So, once again, do you find the fact that the towers collapsed laughable?
 
Christophera said:
Yes, infiltration. the gov and the 9-11 movement. At least you have something right.
Click to expand...

I gather they are "infiltrated" because they, too, deny your concrete core ?

Seeing as you have never produced one image of the steel core columns from the raw evidence of 9-11, and evidence was moved from the scene illegally the disposed of, private investigations blocked.
Click to expand...

Oh... so "raw" means "christophere's". I had not understood this before. If it doesn't come from you, it isn't raw. Got it.

the WTC documents taken an hidden in violation of of tederal law, and you have no problem with it, your behaviro goes beypnd nuts towards sociopathic
Click to expand...

What I have a problem with is all the typos in your post.
 
i still havent seen chris expalin the 1983 documentary showing a nice steel core and no concrete

although i suppose its disinfo because it was made by the PANYNJ, cant trust the folks who actually made the building to tell you what its made out of
 
Christophera said:
My site relies on raw evidence.
Click to expand...

Your site interprets evidence.

If this is not raw evidence, what is?
Click to expand...

Second-hand evidence.

If that is not a 17 x 30 foot block of concrete what is it?
Click to expand...

Pixels.

You images show a plie of debri in front of the concrete.
Click to expand...

That's your explanation why we don't see them ?

Homer, it all blowed up. Don't cry.
Click to expand...

It "blowed" up ? Why do you claim to see it on YOUR picture, then ?

The explosive circuits were interrupted by intelligent caring, courageous Mohawks that figured out wtf was happening. Imagine how impossible it would be to convince anyone if that one chunk of the core wasn't left.
Click to expand...

Wow. You really are crazy. You're saying that brave american indians decided to save a small pieces of concrete so that the one bearer of truth, christophera, could illuminate the world ?

Also, adress this:

[QUOTE-Uruk]So where is it in this image? It a picture of the same core section as in your picture. I even included your picture in the upper right hand corner for comparison. Where is the 17 foot concrete core that is supposed to be formed around the box column?[/QUOTE]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom