Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

it was just steel and wallboard, 2 pieces of 3/4 inch wall board


Find an image of the towers partially down that show the core colums in the core area. If you cannot find one consider there was a concrete core or, explain why the steel croe columns are not protruding from the top of what ever that is. Oh, explain what that is too.


this is why the guys trapped in an elevator were able to cut and dig through the wall board into a bathroom,

Some elevators were up against concrete on one or two walls, others had no concrete aroundthem at all.

why do you think the core was concrete and steel?

I witnessed the construction of the concrete core by watching a 2 hour documentary that aired on channel 10, KCET in southern California in 1990. Over an hour of it was basically about the concrete core becuase it was the real challenge in the construction, It was called "The Construction of the Twin Towers". I've been a welder for 35 years and worked as a survey for a civil engineer for 20 years often doing layout for concrete contractors. I've also worked with high explosives doing above ground blasting. Also, operated heavy equipment on demo projects.

What is your experience and sources of information?
 
Find an image of the towers partially down that show the core colums in the core area. If you cannot find one consider there was a concrete core or, explain why the steel croe columns are not protruding from the top of what ever that is. Oh, explain what that is too.



Some elevators were up against concrete on one or two walls, others had no concrete aroundthem at all.


I witnessed the construction of the concrete core by watching a 2 hour documentary that aired on channel 10, KCET in southern California in 1990. Over an hour of it was basically about the concrete core becuase it was the real challenge in the construction, It was called "The Construction of the Twin Towers". I've been a welder for 35 years and worked as a survey for a civil engineer for 20 years often doing layout for concrete contractors. I've also worked with high explosives doing above ground blasting. Also, operated heavy equipment on demo projects.

What is your experience and sources of information?

But did you use LSD?
 
I witnessed the construction of the concrete core by watching a 2 hour documentary that aired on channel 10, KCET in southern California in 1990. Over an hour of it was basically about the concrete core becuase it was the real challenge in the construction, It was called "The Construction of the Twin Towers". I've been a welder for 35 years and worked as a survey for a civil engineer for 20 years often doing layout for concrete contractors. I've also worked with high explosives doing above ground blasting. Also, operated heavy equipment on demo projects.

What is your experience and sources of information?

I have lived in Southern California my entire life. KCET is not now and never has been on channel 10, and certainly was not on channel 10 in 1990.

ETA: There has NEVER been a broadcast station on channel 10 in the LA area.
 
After years of "research," he doesn't even know which tower was where on the site. It doesn't get much worse than that

I've admitted I do not know which tower this image is from. It doesn't matter.

What matters is that you've tried to show what it is and absolutely blew it.

The below image is your image which you have no explanation for. I have shown with annotations and lines to fit it in with another image of WTC 2 from the east and show it is WTC 2.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3736&stc=1&d=1161654633
 

Attachments

  • WTC2.coreariel.jpg
    WTC2.coreariel.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 7
I have shown with annotations and lines to fit it in with another image of WTC 2 from the east and show it is WTC 2.
Restate that sentence so that it makes sense. Precisely what do you mean "fit it in with another image"? Are you proposing to superimpose it into another image? Are you comparing distinguishing marks and concluding that they are common to both images? Describe what you're doing; don't handwave and say that it's already proven.

And as for the image itself, are you seriously implying that each blue line represents a hallway? That means that there are six columns of hallways, not the one depicted in your concrete core picture. Per floor, how many hallways are there, and in which directions do they run?

corehallsdoors.gif

This diagram does not match what you just attached. What's the explanation?
 
Last edited:
I have lived in Southern California my entire life. KCET is not now and never has been on channel 10, and certainly was not on channel 10 in 1990.

ETA: There has NEVER been a broadcast station on channel 10 in the LA area.

I quit watching TV 7 years ago. You better too, it is getting to your brain.

http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Jerome_Al_19651539.aspx
...
Al Jerome, president of KCET (Cox Cable Channel 10), grapples with these issues every day. A former NBC executive, Mr. Jerome has been running Southern California's pre-eminent public television station for the past nine years. Last week, while in Santa Barbara for a board of directors retreat, he took time to discuss the challenges his station is facing, and propose some creative solutions.
 
And I've never said the PA applied the C4 coating, flat our error. The rebar was delivered with the coating on it.

well my my...WTF were you insinuating here then?:-

my bold
At about this time the videographers actually imparted a sense of mystery having to do with the core. Basically the entire documentary was about the core from then on out.

The videographers eventually found the big slow down in the construction to be the butt welds in the 3 inch high tensile steel rebar which arrived in 40 foot long sticks and had to be 100% welded, x-rayed, and recoated with the "special anti corrosion, vibration" plastic coating. The videographers in talking with concrete contractors found out about forced evacuations of the concrete crews pouring floors just prior to running the steel after the corrugated panels were sandblasted. They actually had video of the crews jogging between floors after the PA and the contractor got over the conflict the unplanned or announced stoppage of work was discovered by the contractor who threatened to sue because the stoppages over a few days had cost him about $7k in wages for workers who were sitting around waiting while the PA did some mysterious thing the videographers never did figure out.

I remember the video of the workers jogging showed the PA security guys standing in the adjoining hallway next to a stack of 5 gallon buckets waiting for the workers to clear the floor.

what exactly did those PA security guys have in the buckets? some of your ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊?

BV
 
Last edited:
And as for the image itself, are you seriously implying that each blue line represents a hallway? That means that there are six columns of hallways, not the one depicted in your concrete core picture. Per floor, how many hallways are there, and in which directions do they run?

You need to read.

It is stated that the towers had different hallway schemes. My diagram is of WTC 1 and it says so RIGHT IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE the diagram here,

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

The fat blue lines are doorways and the thin blue lines are both side of doorways. Compare to the other linked image and you will see that the proportions fit and the light shining through works too.
 
well my my...WTF were you insinuating here then?:-



what exactly did those PA security guys have in the buckets? some of your ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊?

BV

Okay, I thought you were referring to the core. Yes, it appears they were applying explosives to the floors.
 
I quit watching TV 7 years ago. You better too, it is getting to your brain.

http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Jerome_Al_19651539.aspx
...
Al Jerome, president of KCET (Cox Cable Channel 10), grapples with these issues every day. A former NBC executive, Mr. Jerome has been running Southern California's pre-eminent public television station for the past nine years. Last week, while in Santa Barbara for a board of directors retreat, he took time to discuss the challenges his station is facing, and propose some creative solutions.
A cable system can put programming on any channel that suits them. That does not change the fact that KCET identifies itself as channel 28. It does not, and never has, identified itself as channel 10.
 
I quit watching TV 7 years ago. You better too, it is getting to your brain.

http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Jerome_Al_19651539.aspx
...
Al Jerome, president of KCET (Cox Cable Channel 10), grapples with these issues every day. A former NBC executive, Mr. Jerome has been running Southern California's pre-eminent public television station for the past nine years. Last week, while in Santa Barbara for a board of directors retreat, he took time to discuss the challenges his station is facing, and propose some creative solutions.
Go here. Enter KCET. Select detailed output. Get this:

Mon Oct 23 22:25:23 2006 Eastern time

Search Parameters Callsign: KCET State: CA Record type: Lower Channel 2 Upper Channel 69


Next RecordKCET CA LOS ANGELES USA Licensee: COMMUNITY TELEVISION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Service Designation: TV NTSC (analog) television station Channel: 28 554 - 560 MHz Licensed File No.: BLET-19820607LE Facility ID number: 13058 CDBS Application ID No.: 43885 34° 13' 26.00" N Latitude Site in Mexican Border Zone
118° 03' 44.00" W Longitude (NAD 27) Polarization: Horizontal (H) Effective Radiated Power (ERP):2450.kW ERP Antenna Height Above Average Terrain:926.meters HAAT Antenna Height Above Mean Sea Level:1825.5meters AMSL Antenna Height Above Ground Level:100.6meters AGL TV Zone: 2 Frequency Offset: 0 (zero) Directional Antenna ID No.: 17555 Pattern Rotation: 0.00 Antenna Make: AND Antenna Model: 35E4 Relative Field values for directional antenna Relative Field polar plot Relative field values do not include any pattern rotation that may be indicated above. 0° 0.863 60° 0.576 120° 0.403 180° 0.515 240° 0.582 300° 0.919 10° 0.973 70° 0.833 130° 0.499 190° 0.568 250° 0.577 310° 1.000 20° 0.973 80° 0.964 140° 0.564 200° 0.568 260° 0.505 320° 0.854 30° 0.759 90° 0.905 150° 0.569 210° 0.515 270° 0.408 330° 0.552 40° 0.544 100° 0.669 160° 0.545 220° 0.483 280° 0.467 340° 0.484 50° 0.459 110° 0.455 170° 0.483 230° 0.545 290° 0.697 350° 0.673 Additional azimuths: 45° 0.500
135° 0.540
225° 0.511
315° 0.931
Additional Individual Tower Information from the Antenna Structure Registration database. (Use the Registration Number link for detailed information.) ASRN
Site
Elevation
(meters)Overall Height
Above Ground
(meters)Overall Height
Above Mean Sea
Level (meters)NAD 83 Tower Coordinates
-----------------------------------------------Convert to
NAD 27Latitude Longitude 1012244 1724.8 110.6 1835.4 N 34°13'26.0" W 118°3'47.0" To NAD27
FAA: Obstruction/Airport Airspace searches CDBS: Station Info Application Info Mailing Address Assignments and Transfers Application List CDBS Search Page Ownership Info EEO Call Sign Changes Site: Region Map Area Map Local Map Area: Service Contour Map (64 dBu) Alternate Map Link ULS: Related facilities in ULS
Previous Record -- Next RecordKCET CA LOS ANGELES USA (Digital) Licensee: COMMUNITY TELEVISION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Service Designation: DT Digital television station Channel: 59 740 - 746 MHz Modification of Construction Permit File No.: BMPEDT-20000428ADF Facility ID number: 13058 CDBS Application ID No.: 502823 34° 13' 26.00" N Latitude Site in Mexican Border Zone
118° 03' 44.00" W Longitude (NAD 27) Polarization: Horizontal (H) Effective Radiated Power (ERP):340.kW ERP Antenna Height Above Average Terrain:913.meters HAAT Antenna Height Above Mean Sea Level:1812.meters AMSL Antenna Height Above Ground Level:87.meters AGL TV Zone: 2 Directional Antenna ID No.: 33524 Pattern Rotation: 0.00 Relative Field values for directional antenna Relative Field polar plot Relative field values do not include any pattern rotation that may be indicated above. 0° 0.276 60° 0.453 120° 0.953 180° 0.525 240° 0.692 300° 0.916 10° 0.304 70° 0.625 130° 0.875 190° 0.507 250° 0.782 310° 0.790 20° 0.304 80° 0.790 140° 0.782 200° 0.507 260° 0.875 320° 0.625 30° 0.276 90° 0.916 150° 0.692 210° 0.525 270° 0.953 330° 0.453 40° 0.257 100° 0.986 160° 0.618 220° 0.562 280° 0.996 340° 0.314 50° 0.314 110° 0.996 170° 0.562 230° 0.618 290° 0.986 350° 0.257 Additional azimuths: 105° 1.000
285° 1.000
Additional Individual Tower Information from the Antenna Structure Registration database. (Use the Registration Number link for detailed information.) ASRN
Site
Elevation
(meters)Overall Height
Above Ground
(meters)Overall Height
Above Mean Sea
Level (meters)NAD 83 Tower Coordinates
-----------------------------------------------Convert to
NAD 27Latitude Longitude 1012244 1724.8 110.6 1835.4 N 34°13'26.0" W 118°3'47.0" To NAD27
FAA: Obstruction/Airport Airspace searches CDBS: Station Info Application Info Mailing Address Assignments and Transfers Application List CDBS Search Page Ownership Info EEO Call Sign Changes Site: Region Map Area Map Local Map Area: Service Contour Map (41 dBu) Alternate Map Link ULS: Related facilities in ULS
Previous Record -- Next RecordKCET CA LOS ANGELES USA (Digital) Licensee: COMMUNITY TELEVISION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Service Designation: DT Digital television station Channel: 59 740 - 746 MHz Licensed File No.: BLEDT-20000626AFV Facility ID number: 13058 CDBS Application ID No.: 506339 34° 13' 26.00" N Latitude Site in Mexican Border Zone
118° 03' 44.00" W Longitude (NAD 27) Polarization: Horizontal (H) Effective Radiated Power (ERP):190.kW ERP Antenna Height Above Average Terrain:913.meters HAAT Antenna Height Above Mean Sea Level:1812.meters AMSL Antenna Height Above Ground Level:87.meters AGL TV Zone: 2 Directional Antenna ID No.: 33524 Pattern Rotation: 0.00 Antenna Make: DIE Antenna Model: TFU-10DSC-RC170 Relative Field values for directional antenna Relative Field polar plot Relative field values do not include any pattern rotation that may be indicated above. 0° 0.276 60° 0.453 120° 0.953 180° 0.525 240° 0.692 300° 0.916 10° 0.304 70° 0.625 130° 0.875 190° 0.507 250° 0.782 310° 0.790 20° 0.304 80° 0.790 140° 0.782 200° 0.507 260° 0.875 320° 0.625 30° 0.276 90° 0.916 150° 0.692 210° 0.525 270° 0.953 330° 0.453 40° 0.257 100° 0.986 160° 0.618 220° 0.562 280° 0.996 340° 0.314 50° 0.314 110° 0.996 170° 0.562 230° 0.618 290° 0.986 350° 0.257 Additional azimuths: 105° 1.000
285° 1.000
Additional Individual Tower Information from the Antenna Structure Registration database. (Use the Registration Number link for detailed information.) ASRN
Site
Elevation
(meters)Overall Height
Above Ground
(meters)Overall Height
Above Mean Sea
Level (meters)NAD 83 Tower Coordinates
-----------------------------------------------Convert to
NAD 27Latitude Longitude 1012244 1724.8 110.6 1835.4 N 34°13'26.0" W 118°3'47.0" To NAD27
FAA: Obstruction/Airport Airspace searches CDBS: Station Info Application Info Mailing Address Assignments and Transfers Application List CDBS Search Page Ownership Info EEO Call Sign Changes Site: Region Map Area Map Local Map Area: Service Contour Map (41 dBu) Alternate Map Link ULS: Related facilities in ULS
First Record

*** 3 Records Retrieved ***




So, tell us again what channel KCET uses.
 
Again, for those new to the discussion:

Our friend, Christopher A. Brown, asserts the Twin Towers were originally constructed with explosive materials secretly built into each with the intent for them to be someday demolished.

And the reason you laugh and scoff? As a child you were hypnotized.
 
You need to read.



It is stated that the towers had different hallway schemes. My diagram is of WTC 1 and it says so RIGHT IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE the diagram here,

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
I've referenced an external source that says that the towers' floor layouts were largely identical. You have only referenced your own webpage to contradict me. You can't just make things up and call them proof. You need to do research. So, come back when you find an impartial source that tells you that the tower layouts were substantially different.

The fat blue lines are doorways and the thin blue lines are both side of doorways. Compare to the other linked image and you will see that the proportions fit and the light shining through works too.
That is nonsense. The resolution of those pictures is insufficient to positively identify a doorway. It could be something equivalently-coloured, like the paint on the wall, or a troll with a mirror. Unless you can identify a specific detail which is unique to a doorway, and present in the blue regions, you have no evidence to speak of. Identify the details, or retract your claim.
 
Again, for those new to the discussion:

Our friend, Christopher A. Brown, asserts the Twin Towers were originally constructed with explosive materials secretly built into each with the intent for them to be someday demolished.

And the reason you laugh and scoff? As a child you were hypnotized.

Mr. Kcin, as I told you before, your posts are great. Beautiful I will add now. Don't stop.

-Bell
 
Dear Christophera:

There were not and never have been concrete cores in the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Please seek the professional help that you so desperately and so obviously require.

Love,
The Rest of the World.
 
I've referenced an external source that says that the towers' floor layouts were largely identical. You have only referenced your own webpage to contradict me. You can't just make things up and call them proof. You need to do research. So, come back when you find an impartial source that tells you that the tower layouts were substantially different.

Read the survivors accounts and you will see that each tower had special training for the fire marshalls for each floor. The towers cores were so different that specific training for evacuations was required for the the different towers.

Oh, you have a problem with reading. You may never know the truth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom