Pakistan ISI and Atta

[Docker]

This appears to be the biggest smoking gun in the whole 9/11 affair.
The money man, Mahmood, was having a cosy meeting in Washington while thousands of people died in an operation he funded.

He has never even been questioned by the FBI. Very tellingly, the 911 Commision claimed the funding was of little importance. I find this astounding

 

[MikeW]

The money man, Mahmood, was having a cosy meeting in Washington while thousands of people died in an operation he funded.

Please tell us your evidence for him being the "money man" and funding the operation.

 

[Docker]

Please tell us your evidence for him being the "money man" and funding the operation.

The FBI admits it. Besides, the mere suggestion of it should arouse some sort of investigation.

I went to 911myths and they just danced round the issue and did'nt refute it. The 911 Commision never looked at it. New investigation needed

 

[Donal]

And exactly why would he place himself at the scene of the crime with his fellow conspirators? It seems to me that people trying to pull this sort of thing off should be distancing themselves from each other. Please explain why him being in Washington has any significance at all.

 

[MikeW]

The FBI admits it.

Link?

The 911 Commision never looked at it.

How do you know that?

 

[chacal]

"The FBI admits it" means in CT that Alex Jones said that "it's all admitted" and he's never wrong.

 

[Docker]

And exactly why would he place himself at the scene of the crime with his fellow conspirators? It seems to me that people trying to pull this sort of thing off should be distancing themselves from each other. Please explain why him being in Washington has any significance at all.

Criminals often visit the scene of their crime. I just find it an insult to the families that this man has never been questioned and the inquiry they had to lobby for thought the funding of 9/11 was insignificant.

 

[Docker]

Link?


How do you know that?

It says in the report that they considered the funding was of little importance. The funding of the worst terrorist attack in history isn't a big deal?

 

[DavidJames]

It says in the report that they considered the funding was of little importance. The funding of the worst terrorist attack in history isn't a big deal?

You've been asked multiple times now to support your claims, please do so.

 

[chacal]

It says in the report that they considered the funding was of little importance. The funding of the worst terrorist attack in history isn't a big deal?

The Jones Report?

 

[MikeW]

It says in the report that they considered the funding was of little importance.

That is not evidence that they didn't look into the issue. Do you have any?

 

[Pardalis]

Hi Docker.

If you have any links to information about this I'd like to see it (links to irrefutable sources that is, please no Alex Jones and no Hopsicker).

Thanks.

 

[Donal]

Criminals often visit the scene of their crime.

Link? Proof? anything? I've heard anecdotal evidence of serial killers doing that, but usually in actual criminal enterprises, the conspirators distance themselves from any link to the crime.

And don't you see your logic as a little circular?

The proof he committed a crime it is that he visited the scene of his crime.

I just find it an insult to the families that this man has never been questioned and the inquiry they had to lobby for thought the funding of 9/11 was insignificant.

And you don't think its insulting to tell the FBI how to do their job? Or that you are latching on to these people's pain?

 

[T.A.M.]

Docker:

Welcome to the JREF Forum on Conspiracy Theories. All views here are tolerated, no matter what side of the argument they fall on.

Everyone:

This is old, and far from a smoking gun.

The report is based on one report from the Times of India which said that Indian Intelligence officials (who have nothing against Pakistan, right?) confirmed that this guy was involved in wiring money to Atta. It has never been confirmed. All other magazine that ran the story, including the Wall Street Journal, based all of their storys on this one article from the Indian Times.

FBI have NOT come out and admitted it, unless there is some statement directly from them, in a news article I missed somewhere...if so, please, give us a link to it so I may read it.

TAM

 

[Cylinder]

Everyone settle down. The invisible pixie that lives in by back garden assures me that Docker has it all wrong.

 

[jon]

The 9/11 Commission Report talks about Al Qaeda funding from pp169-72; there's more specific info on the hijackers in Chapter 7. So far as I can tell, they never say funding is of little importance.

 

[Muckar-duva]

The 9/11 Commission Report talks about Al Qaeda funding from pp169-72; there's more specific info on the hijackers in Chapter 7. So far as I can tell, they never say funding is of little importance.

I have the same recollection as you do. I just skimmed the pages now, and it's quite detailed. I would recommend Docker to read at least those pages from the commission report.

 

[MikeW]

The relevant quote comes from here:

To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance. Al Qaeda had many avenues of funding. If a particular funding source had dried up, al Qaeda could have easily tapped a different source or diverted funds from another project to fund an operation that cost $400,000–$500,000 over nearly two years.
Page 172
9/11 Commission Report

 

[JamesB]

And exactly why would he place himself at the scene of the crime with his fellow conspirators? It seems to me that people trying to pull this sort of thing off should be distancing themselves from each other. Please explain why him being in Washington has any significance at all.

Ahh, but you forget, in the conspiracy world people do everything possible to draw attention to themselves, like Larry Silverstein admitting to blowing up WTC7 in a PBS interview, Bush telling the Secret Service to not evacuate the school during the attack, and the conspirators placing thousands of explosives in 3 different occupied office buildings, just to marginally increase the psychological effect of the airplane crashes.

 

[Garb]

Ahh, but you forget, in the conspiracy world people do everything possible to draw attention to themselves, like Larry Silverstein admitting to blowing up WTC7 in a PBS interview, Bush telling the Secret Service to not evacuate the school during the attack, and the conspirators placing thousands of explosives in 3 different occupied office buildings, just to marginally increase the psychological effect of the airplane crashes.

And of course stealing a bunch of gold bars for no reason whatsoever.


George Bush loves goooooooollldddd!