• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Moving On is coming.

Pardalis said:
Do you understand what' I'm saying?
Click to expand...

Pardalis, you ask me if i think it's OK that people are accused of crimes without proof. While you ask me that, the principle of "innocent 'till proven guilty" is demolished by Bush. Why should i care about killtown's behaviour? He speaks for himself. Do you care about Bush's behaviour? He speaks for the most powerful country in the world. Ever heard of the "Ermächtigungsgesetz"?

Bye.
 
Well, basically you're doing the same thing Bush is doing then.

ETA: I still have no idea how this relates to proving the US government is behind 9/11.
 
Last edited:
Man thats friggin lame.

I guess russell after his big welcome matt did not like to get to the blunt truth of the matter. His 'well researched' theories are wrong.
This is pathetic. If you cant be humble and be wrong when shown then your a boy, not a man. All this crap about belief systems, trying to sound philosophical. What rubbish. Skip the BS and get to the point. You are wrong. Just take it on the chin and be a better person for it.

Weak.

My two cents.

EDIT: How Ironic that the threads that last the longest are the most stupidly illogical brain death posts there is and when someone comes and claims to be a good 9/11 CT researcher it only lasts 18 pages.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Pardalis, you ask me if i think it's OK that people are accused of crimes without proof. While you ask me that, the principle of "innocent 'till proven guilty" is demolished by Bush. Why should i care about killtown's behaviour? He speaks for himself. Do you care about Bush's behaviour? He speaks for the most powerful country in the world. Ever heard of the "Ermächtigungsgesetz"?

Bye.
Click to expand...

I also have problems to understand you, Childlike. I personally disagree with guantanamo and the iraq war, especially because lack of evidence and misuse or stretching of laws, but i also don´t understand your point here.

What is your evidence that america is involved to 9/11 beside books and videos?
Is the "Enabling Act" compareable to any american laws?

Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich

The Reichstag has enacted the following law, which is hereby proclaimed with the assent of the Reichsrat, it having been established that the requirements for a constitutional amendment have been fulfilled:

Article 1
In addition to the procedure prescribed by the constitution, laws of the Reich may also be enacted by the government of the Reich. This includes the laws referred to by Articles 85 Paragraph 2 and Article 87 of the constitution.[1]

Article 2
Laws enacted by the government of the Reich may deviate from the constitution as long as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat. The rights of the President remain undisturbed.

Article 3
Laws enacted by the Reich government shall be issued by the Chancellor and announced in the Reich Gazette. They shall take effect on the day following the announcement, unless they prescribe a different date. Articles 68 to 77 of the Constitution do not apply to laws enacted by the Reich government.[2]

Article 4
Treaties of the Reich with foreign states which affect matters of Reich legislation shall not require the approval of the bodies of the legislature. The government of the Reich shall issue the regulations required for the execution of such treaties.

Article 5
This law takes effect with the day of its proclamation. It loses force on 1 April 1937 or if the present Reich government is replaced by another.
Click to expand...

ADDED: I´m still sceptic because of foreknowledge - but couldn´t it be true that it was just american ignorance to threads on their soil?
 
Last edited:
Why does this always have to be about Nazi Germany?

Can we stick to 9/11?
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
Why does this always have to be about Nazi Germany?

Can we stick to 9/11?
Click to expand...

Good point.

Oliver, if you want to discuss Nazi Germany, perhaps you can do so in the appropriate forum. Interjecting this stuff into a thread that has nothing to do with Nazi Germany isn't appropriate.
 
LashL said:
Good point.

Oliver, if you want to discuss Nazi Germany, perhaps you can do so in the appropriate forum. Interjecting this stuff into a thread that has nothing to do with Nazi Germany isn't appropriate.
Click to expand...

Actually, it was Childlike who made the allusion first.
 
It is funny how alot of the truthers come in here and whine about how BUSH et al are taking away freedoms, and what not, yet they are willing to convict the guy, and many have suggested his execution, based on Coincidences, heresay, speculation, and conjecture.

All I have to say, is if I ever get falsely accused of a crime, I hope none of them are on the jury.

TAM
 
Bump.

Questions to be answered, Russell. They aren't going away. Do you support the FDNY, or the conspiracy theorists? What have you determined about the Silverstein quote?
 
LashL said:
Good point.

Oliver, if you want to discuss Nazi Germany, perhaps you can do so in the appropriate forum. Interjecting this stuff into a thread that has nothing to do with Nazi Germany isn't appropriate.
Click to expand...

HUH? Childlike started this kind of relation. :boggled:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom