• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Blown to Kingdom Come


Yep.

And I'll repeat:

The troll's "point" is always the same - her only "point" is to start BS threads repeatedly so that she can restate all the same old arguments that she made before which were thoroughly demolished (and no pre-planted explosives were required) on her prior threads.

ETA: And I should have added this: and she'll also change the subject repeatedly, won't answer straightforward questions with a straightforward defensible answer, will ask BS questions in response to legitimate questions, will never, ever provide actual evidence to back up her claims, and she won't educate herself sufficiently to even begin to try understand the facts and evidence. She just spouts CT nonsense like so much projectile vomit.
 
Last edited:
I've looked at the ultra-mega-hi-res version of the photo hosted at the NOAA site. There is no evidence of any "crater" whatsoever.

Swing and a miss, TS$1.98.
 
What should it look like, IF the WTC towers WERE blown up?

It would look just like it looked. The rapid collapse, the disintegration, the mushroom cloud, everything. Every part of both events looked like a powerful volcanic eruption from beginning to end.

Anyone who thinks anything "fell down" is just not talking about the same event.
 
It would look just like it looked. The rapid collapse, the disintegration, the mushroom cloud, everything. Every part of both events looked like a powerful volcanic eruption from beginning to end.

Anyone who thinks anything "fell down" is just not talking about the same event.

One crucial part is missing:

Where were the explosions?
 
They fell 110 feet. You expect them to be intact?

You mean stories, but the building disintegrated in mid air, not when it hit the ground. ANd no, falling from 110 stories will not disintegrate structural steel and and concrete. We observe structural steel evaporating before our very eyes.

Study the evidence people.
 
It would look just like it looked. The rapid collapse, the disintegration, the mushroom cloud, everything. Every part of both events looked like a powerful volcanic eruption from beginning to end.

Riiight. So a volcano destroyed the Trade Center Towers?

Anyone who thinks anything "fell down" is just not talking about the same event.

Sooo, the towers fell up?

:dl:
 
TS1234's "point" is always the same - her only "point" is to start BS threads repeatedly so that she can restate all the same old arguments that she made before which were thoroughly demolished (and no pre-planted explosives were required) on her prior threads.

She'll also change the subject repeatedly, won't answer straightforward questions with a straightforward defensible answer, will ask BS questions in response to legitimate questions, will never, ever provide actual evidence to back up her claims, and she won't educate herself sufficiently to even begin to try to understand the facts and evidence.

She just spouts CT nonsense like so much projectile vomit.

Hey, if TS1234 can keep repeating herself on every thread that she posts on and every thread that she starts, well, I guess it's okay for me to keep repeating this.

At least my post has the benefit of being factual.
 
You mean stories, but the building disintegrated in mid air, not when it hit the ground. ANd no, falling from 110 stories will not disintegrate structural steel and and concrete. We observe structural steel evaporating before our very eyes.

Study the evidence people.

So the steel columns that were found at gorund zero were actually disintegrated? Wow, I've been blind all along!


Wasn't the building made up of many other things besides steel and concrete?
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen evidence of even a single floor assembly.
By gosh, he's right! Now that I think about it, I find it extremely suspicious that I haven't seen ANY of these things in the rubble:

A Deer Park water cooler with the water bottle sitting on top, plugged in.

A complete table setting from Windows on the World.

A working computer network of any kind.

A single desk organizer with the pens not spilled all over the place.

A curtain rod–curtain–holdback–drywall screws–paint–drywall–window frame–window–fireproofing–column–spandrel–flange–cladding–truss–pan–concrete–wall–story–World Trade Center tower assembly.
 
Oh look! All the debris turned into dust! :eek:

11107453afd10a1d70.jpg
 
So the steel columns that were found at gorund zero were actually disintegrated? Wow, I've been blind all along!


Wasn't the building made up of many other things besides sttel and concrete anyhow?

Our best estimate is that about 20% of the structural steel remained macroscopic. About 1% (at most) of the concrete remained macroscopic.

Yes, besides structural steel and concrete, the towers contained machinery, carpet, furniture, computers, wiring, plumbing, and human beings. Almost 100% of this material was disintegrated into a fine powder.

Oddly, sheets of paper seemed to have survived very well. Also odd is the burned out cars, where steel is burned yet plastic isn't. And cars that look so melted as do defy description, yet were not hit by rubble.
 
No core? What's this then?

The concrete thing has to do with another thread.
 

Attachments

  • 4166.jpg
    4166.jpg
    142.1 KB · Views: 5
By gosh, he's right! Now that I think about it, I find it extremely suspicious that I haven't seen ANY of these things in the rubble:

A Deer Park water cooler with the water bottle sitting on top, plugged in.

A complete table setting from Windows on the World.

A working computer network of any kind.

A single desk organizer with the pens not spilled all over the place.

A curtain rod–curtain–holdback–drywall screws–paint–drywall–window frame–window–fireproofing–column–spandrel–flange–cladding–truss–pan–concrete–wall–story–World Trade Center tower assembly.

But you found Waldo™?
 

Back
Top Bottom