• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Video of wtc 7

Gravy said:
I'm not lying. They say they've never heard of you.
Click to expand...

really? that proves how bad a researcher u are

i attended there for 4 years

i put up with u up to now cos u were kinda fun, but that kind of despicable liar has got u on my roll of shame aka my ignore list
 
einsteen said:
Accounts are important on the one hand but on the other hand one says that eyewitnesses are the least reliable source... I really don't know what I have to think about it. A building cannot lie, see that areal photograph

http://wtc2001ny.tripod.com/wtc-7.jpg.html

If you only statistically look at the chance that this happens to fire, it's absolutely 1/(10 times age of the universe)
Click to expand...
einsteen, I ask you again: will you read the accounts I compiled, then decide if you have any reason to doubt them?

If not, then why are you posting here? Do you presume to know more than the experts who were there?

Your statistical analysis is idiotic, and I suspect you know it.
 
So, how many different views of WTC7's collapse are there out there? How many film crews did it take to get that many shots?

Why were there so many film crews filming the building if it wasn't about to collapse, and only had a "few small fires" with "no damage"? Weren't there enough other things going on that day to keep them occupied? Did they just say, "Screw it, we're tired, let's all just film this one building that nothing interesting is happening in"?

Or, just maybe, there was extensive damage, large fires, a lot of people working on it, and a lot of building engineers who predicted a collapse, which all the film guys wanted to get a shot of? Just possibly maybe?

The video is evidence all right. Evidence that a lot of TV guys thought something was going on there.
 
einsteen said:
Accounts are important on the one hand but on the other hand one says that eyewitnesses are the least reliable source... I really don't know what I have to think about it. A building cannot lie, see that areal photograph

http://wtc2001ny.tripod.com/wtc-7.jpg.html

If you only statistically look at the chance that this happens to fire, it's absolutely 1/(10 times age of the universe)
Click to expand...

:confused:

Shouldn't variables such as, duration, size, intensity, not to mention where inside the building, it burned, be taken into account for the "fire"?

1/(10 times age of the universe)?! Hmm. My calculator shows 1/(10 times age of my cat). For your math, did y'all add feet to miles per hour? It's a common mistake here....
 
Gravy said:
einsteen, I ask you again: will you read the accounts I compiled, then decide if you have any reason to doubt them?

If not, then why are you posting here? Do you presume to know more than the experts who were there?

Your statistical analysis is idiotic, and I suspect you know it.
Click to expand...

u accept those witnesses but not witnesses like willie rodriguez

ive wasted enough time on u punk
 
pdoherty76 said:
really? that proves how bad a researcher u are

i attended there for 4 years

i put up with u up to now cos u were kinda fun, but that kind of despicable liar has got u on my roll of shame aka my ignore list
Click to expand...
You already said I was on ignore. That was brief.

And no, I'm not lying. pdoherty gave me very specific information and the university said they have no record of any such person attending.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
If you feel you have damning evidence showing that the FDNY was involved, why are you not going to the BBC, or the Guardian, or some such and doing something about it?
Click to expand...

because i am nobody, im not a journalist

anyway the bbc wont accept anything that goes against the official fairytale
 
pdoherty76 said:
u accept those witnesses but not witnesses like willie rodriguez

ive wasted enough time on u punk
Click to expand...

Then why are you here wasting your time posting? Why aren't you taking your evidence to the media, which can get the word out to everyone? Why are you just posting on a message board and letting these villains get away with their crimes?
 
pdoherty76 said:
u accept those witnesses but not witnesses like willie rodriguez

ive wasted enough time on u punk
Click to expand...
So you're putting me on ignore for the third time in three posts? That must be a record.

I completely accept Willie Rodriguez's statement about what he heard and saw. I do not agree with his conclusions, because they do not correspond with the overwhelming amount of contradictory evidence.

Willie Rodriguez is also not an explosives expert. The FDNY are fire and structure experts.
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
pdoherty gave me very specific information and the university said they have no record of any such person attending.
Click to expand...

Did you check the university day care records?

I'm just asking questions....
 
Gravy said:
You already said I was on ignore. That was brief.

And no, I'm not lying. pdoherty gave me very specific information and the university said they have no record of any such person attending.
Click to expand...

well with lies like that i can no longer accept anything u say

bye bye baby
 
pdoherty76 said:
because i am nobody, im not a journalist

anyway the bbc wont accept anything that goes against the official fairytale
Click to expand...

Surely, there is some world-wide recognized news outlet that is willing to stand up against the perpatrators of this heinous crime. Why are you not contacting them with this critical, damning information?
 
The official story is in fact that it is an indirect collapse, due to a piece of debris that came from wtc1 and/or wtc2 and they collapsed due to fire and some damage. Did Silverstein drink some tea with some terrorists in a cave, guys if you hit it there then that piece of debris will hit my damned building also and my ensurance will pay me even more...
 
this is getting stupid, i now have 35 people on my ignore list

proves theres at least 35 immature cretins on this forum
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom