• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Video of wtc 7

pdoherty76, Seen this interview ?

http://youtube.com/results?search_query=jowenko+interviews

And yes the 'about to blow up' video has been posted here before, it's absolutely related with wtc7 because the original video is a CNN compilation (look at the scrolling text, assuming CT'ers didn't add it)
This is a matter of time, sooner or later it is general knowledge it is a CD. I'm sure that there also people around that also think that but they will never admit that they think that, a kind of psychological self-faking. The moon-does-not-exist arguments are used.
 
pdoherty76 said:
they had to stop searching for survivors
Click to expand...
That's right, pdoherty. And when you accuse them of doing that in order to participate in a crime, you make a vile accusation for which you have provided zero evidence.

Retract your accusation against the FDNY now, pdoherty.

[gravy answer my question please

 if fema dont know why it collapsed how come u do?[/quote]
Why the hell are you talking about FEMA? Their role in the investigation was years ago. You haven't even read NIST's interim report, have you? You didn't even know this was still being investigated, did you?

You said you read my paper, pdoherty. Why did you lie?

Retract your accusation against the FDNY now, pdoherty.
 
Gravy said:
That's right, pdoherty. And when you accuse them of doing that in order to participate in a crime, you make a vile accusation for which you have provided zero evidence.

Retract your accusation against the FDNY now, pdoherty.

[gravy answer my question please

if fema dont know why it collapsed how come u do?
Click to expand...
Why the hell are you talking about FEMA? Their role in the investigation was years ago. You haven't even read NIST's interim report, have you? You didn't even know this was still being investigated, did you?

You said you read my paper, pdoherty. Why did you lie?

Retract your accusation against the FDNY now, pdoherty.[/quote]


that video is evidence

why does jovenko think it was a controlled demolition?

i willnot be retracting anything


why dont they sue alex jones?
 
Guys this going the wrong way, why not creating a before/against list with arguments and then everyone can draw his/her own conclusion
 
pdoherty76 said:
Why the hell are you talking about FEMA? Their role in the investigation was years ago. You haven't even read NIST's interim report, have you? You didn't even know this was still being investigated, did you?

You said you read my paper, pdoherty. Why did you lie?

Retract your accusation against the FDNY now, pdoherty.
Click to expand...


that video is evidence

why does jovenko think it was a controlled demolition?

i willnot be retracting anything


why dont they sue alex jones?
[/quote]

Who is Jovenko?!?!
 
einsteen said:
pdoherty76, Seen this interview ?

http://youtube.com/results?search_query=jowenko+interviews

And yes the 'about to blow up' video has been posted here before, it's absolutely related with wtc7 because the original video is a CNN compilation (look at the scrolling text, assuming CT'ers didn't add it)
This is a matter of time, sooner or later it is general knowledge it is a CD. I'm sure that there also people around that also think that but they will never admit that they think that, a kind of psychological self-faking. The moon-does-not-exist arguments are used.
Click to expand...


einsteen what are the motivations of the idiots here?

they must just have blind allegiance to the government
 
einsteen said:
pdoherty76, Seen this interview ?

http://youtube.com/results?search_query=jowenko+interviews

And yes the 'about to blow up' video has been posted here before, it's absolutely related with wtc7 because the original video is a CNN compilation (look at the scrolling text, assuming CT'ers didn't add it)
This is a matter of time, sooner or later it is general knowledge it is a CD. I'm sure that there also people around that also think that but they will never admit that they think that, a kind of psychological self-faking. The moon-does-not-exist arguments are used.
Click to expand...
No, einsteen, it's you who is delusional.

Have you read the 200 accounts of WTC 7's condition that I collected in my paper? If so, please summarize what they said about the building's damage, fires, and expected collapse.

If not, please read the accounts and learn. Fair enough?
 
pdoherty76 said:
why don't they sue Alex Jones?
Click to expand...

pdoherty76 is a child molester. That's a fact, and you're all fools for not knowing it.


See, pdoherty? If you don't sue me, it makes me right.

While I understand the logical argument you are trying to make, please refrain from personalizing the argument.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mcMike said:
Hello. I live here in Finland and in here firedepartments don't demolish buildings.
Click to expand...

I think that firedepartments do NOT demolish buildings even in the US.

I would like to ask from You people who lives in US what is the case there? Is it common practice that firemans demolish a building if they can't win the firefight? Is this something that they always do or only when building owner requests it? Has it happened before or was this the very first time?
Click to expand...

This was not the first time. Building 7 was not demolished. You could for example check out the links on Gravy's sig.

Also, how bad the fire must be until one can ask from firechief to demolish a building? Is it possible in private sector too? I mean if you have small fire in garage and you would like to collect insurance money can you just ask from arriving fireman to demolish the building without even trying to fight the fire?
Click to expand...

Ask fireman to demolish a building so you can collect the insuranse money??? That's possible only in Russia:-)
Do you need to plant the explosives yourself or will the firemans do it after they decide to demolish? (by your request)

I am also little curious about the explosives in building under fire. If they are placed in advance isn't it kinda dangerous for rescue workers to operate many hours in such building? What kind of safety-issues does firemens and rescueworkers have? There must be somekind of guidelines available if a building is planted full of explosives so they know to be extra careful. Right? I have always admired the firemans for their bravery but I would have never assumed they are SO brave that they dare to be inside a burning building containing explosives for so many hours.
Click to expand...

You are kidding, right. I know it's saturday night but you shouldn't post that drunk.
 
Gravy said:
pdoherty76 is a child molester. That's a fact, and you're all fools for not knowing it.


See, pdoherty? If you don't sue me, it makes me right.
Click to expand...

i would sue u if u were in the least bit influential


they dont sue him because they dont fancy the idea of having to prove him wrong
 
By the way, people, pdoherty did PM me with his personal information and said I could contact his university to find out about his degree.

The university has no record of his attendance there.
 
Accounts are important on the one hand but on the other hand one says that eyewitnesses are the least reliable source... I really don't know what I have to think about it. A building cannot lie, see that areal photograph

http://wtc2001ny.tripod.com/wtc-7.jpg.html

If you only statistically look at the chance that this happens to fire, it's absolutely 1/(10 times age of the universe)
 
Gravy said:
By the way, people, pdoherty did PM me with his personal information and said I could contact his university to find out about his degree.

The university has no record of his attendance there.
Click to expand...

why are u lying gravy?

thats u on ignore u tit
 
pdoherty76 said:
i would sue u if u were in the least bit influential


they dont sue him because they dont fancy the idea of having to prove him wrong
Click to expand...
Show us your evidence that the FDNY was involved. Right now. Or retract your vile accusation.
 
Sensitive information ? In jowenko's interview they didn't mention that. Was there sensitive information, I didn't know that, ....that explains a lot!
 
einsteen said:
Accounts are important on the one hand but on the other hand one says that eyewitnesses are the least reliable source... I really don't know what I have to think about it. A building cannot lie, see that areal photograph

http://wtc2001ny.tripod.com/wtc-7.jpg.html

If you only statistically look at the chance that this happens to fire, it's absolutely 1/(10 times age of the universe)
Click to expand...

good point einsteen, these idiots only accept eyewitness accounts when it suits them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom