Anyway, here's a picture of me an my old 356, before the fire. This was taken after a day of oil changing, valve lash setting, and sparkplug replacement:
![]()
You will be receiving "Gravy's Seal of Approval of Your Extreme Pissedoffedness at Lying A-holes" certificate in the mail. Thank you, cloudships.Uh, yeah. No rubble to see here:
http://www.newsday.com/media/photo/2002-05/3137393.jpg
or here:
http://www.september11news.com/AANYAftermathVictimSept13.jpg
Of course it was just the DUST from WTC1 and 2 that did this:
http://www.mlynch.org/ml/album/wtc/s_wtc-4.jpg
Just look at the tiny dust particles in this photo:
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/USYDENR/DOCS/wtc_collapse7.jpg
I challenge you to find a single piece of rubble in this photo series:
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...arge&ndsp=18&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N
This one's great. Look at how GIANT these people look compared to the infintesimally small fragments of building under their feet:
http://www.stopviolence.com/images/9-11/groundzero-cut.jpg
No fragments around this burned truck!
http://www.wtc-terrorattack.com/wtc010.JPG
You actually believe THIS could cause cars on the ground to somehow burn?
http://www.artsforge.com/wordforge/wtc/explosion.jpg
WAIT. I almost see a bit of rubble here:
http://www.thefilmconnection.org/dynamic/tfcFilms/602/WTC.jpg
Oops, my bad. Never mind. Must have been dust on the lens.
Pulverized concrete dust pile:
http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/12000/12100/12190/image187.gif
What joker put a fog machine here:
http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/0/0e/WTC-fires.jpg
Burning and falling WTC's could have done this, but certainly could not have burned cars:
http://www.chicouniform.com/Fire/NYFD_WTC_fire_w_ladder.jpg
WANT MORE PUNK???
That's fire-retardant footwear.That's you with your Porsche?
Who's the guy standing next to the car?
And is he wearing socks with sandals?
Sweet. Who's the cutie behind the wheel?
Yes. No rubble, yet toasted cars. Cars half toasted, half pristine. Spontaneoulsy exploding car engines (not gas tanks). Firetruck burned out and windows broken but otherwise undamaged.
Yes, very hard for me to understand, do take a try a explaining how a flaming building falls and accomplishes this stuff.
That's you with your Porsche?
Who's the guy standing next to the car?
And is he wearing socks with sandals?
Well, to be honest, that laser is not exactly what you would call portable. The laser cavity is about 35 feet long and is connected to a 40 ft diameter vacuum sphere and requires a dedicated electrical sub-station to power it.Its not the size of the boat, but the motion of the ocean...
Oh, wait, wrong thread.
Well, to be honest, that laser is not exactly what you would call portable. The laser cavity is about 35 feet long and is connected to a 40 ft diameter vacuum sphere and requires a dedicated electrical sub-station to power it.
I was just showing off one of the cool toys at work.![]()
Well, to be honest, that laser is not exactly what you would call portable. The laser cavity is about 35 feet long and is connected to a 40 ft diameter vacuum sphere and requires a dedicated electrical sub-station to power it.
I was at work.OK, now I'm jealous.
Hey... where were you on 9/11. I mean if you have access to a laser like that, it could have been all your doing!!
Security regulations prohibit me from discussing Starfleet vessels.It sounds like it could easily be fitted into any Constitution-class Starfleet vessel.
[qimg]http://www.pjbstudios.com/temp/dr.evil.laser.jpg[/qimg]
Maybe I was wrong. It wasn't the Death Star at all, it was the Alan Parsons Project.
The point of my long story is that cars don't catch on fire and explode like you see on TV.
You mean cars don't explode and burst into flames in midair when they go over a cliff????
Say it ain't so!

...TS1234, how's the work on the tractor beam coming?
wow, the kingdome and a tower, i dont think you could pick 2 more different kinds of structure if you triedThey note that the Kingdome demolition created a 2.3 richter earthquake, and point out that WTC had many times the PE, and should have caused a much larger earthquake than the 2.3, and 2.1 quakes that were actually measured.
the "bathtub" is composed of the slurry wall around the perimeter of the WTC complex, it was damagedThe foundation of the WTC (the "bathtub") was not damaged.