What do I stand to get from Buddhism?

Buddhism without Nirvana is like jumping up the bandwagon but never playing in the band.
Boy, that was a whole lotta nothin'.

There is a long tradition in certain flavors of Buddhism of warning against seeking for Nirvana.

If you need self-discipline of your body and calmness of your mind, there are faster and better ways and means to attain such ends.
It was the best I found.

I invite you to stay with me for six months on US dollars 100 a day, bed and board and all lessons included, plus free excursions outside for learning about real life and what it is all about.
I don't know of any way of leaving the real world. At any rate, we never left it. During meditation we focused on our breathing... we didn't try to go into any sort of other-worldly state. And during conscious movement, the point is to be as aware of your body and the environment as you can.

Sure, there are esoteric flavors of Buddhism, monks in isolation meditating on world peace, and other such stuff. But I don't recommend any of that.

But you don't really need any Buddhism or any stay with Yrreg, just draw up your assets of health, functioning brain, and capacity for self-introspection and self-direction, then map out your strategies on attaining discipline of body and calmness of mind; and you will succeed, no thanks to Buddhism and anyone else, like Yrreg. It's all self-reliance on the gifts nature has endowed you with -- unless you are plagued by your genes to low IQ and physical deficiencies, like being born blind and dumb.
Oh sure. I agree. You don't need Buddhism. It's not like Xianity which claims to be the only way for everyone. But there's benefit. And yes, if you like, you can also find groups that do a lot of meaningless rituals and self-indulgent pointless BS.
 
Whatever you think about Buddhism (in particular Zen), you can't approach it with an expectation of a reward. Seeking any such reward is the antithesis of Zen.

You want rewards for your trouble go to X-tianity or Islam.
 
I am absolutely certain that everyone here who does read even casually about Buddhism and also also the Buddhists themselves in this forum of the JREF will agree that I stand to get from Buddhism, Nirvana.

This is the root of the problem in general. Despite practicing meditation Buddhists can´t get rid of desire. The worst of all: attain Nirvana.

You have only substituted one desire for another. When are you going to attain Nirvana? Today? Tomorrow? Next year? In 10 years? You have just condemned yourself to a tortuous life. This is far from whatever the Buddha ever meant.
 
This is the root of the problem in general. Despite practicing meditation Buddhists can´t get rid of desire. The worst of all: attain Nirvana.

You have only substituted one desire for another. When are you going to attain Nirvana? Today? Tomorrow? Next year? In 10 years? You have just condemned yourself to a tortuous life. This is far from whatever the Buddha ever meant.

Quite so.
This is discussed at som length by the buddha and other teachers. Attachment to anything is a form of clinging and to practice detachment from it would be beneficial. Nibbanna is alleged to be a state of free action without the constrainst of prejudgement, attachment and conditioning.

As some have it, to also anwer the toothache paradox, the tanha or craving is what is addressed by the teachings of the buddha, I don't believe that he stated the 8FP could cure hunger, physical pain or suffering. Some have phrased it as the detachment from existential suffering (whatever that means), but the buddha was fairly clear that the 8FP could not eliminate all desire, esp. sexual desire.

But of course this was a subject of great contoversy, leading to the debate if an arhat should have seminal emissions when they sleep or not, which led to the first great schism in buddhism.

Just because one folows the path of the buddha does not mean that they are granted wisdom either.

Which is why the buddha compared the dharma to a raft, once one has crossed the river the raft should be left behind, not carried on one's back.

Only those who have attained mibbanna can say if it exists.
 
Hitchhikers or live-in partners of convenience..

I am not a Buddhist but I do know what is the essential and integral Buddhism as understood by the folks who get born and grow up in Buddhist lands and civilizations and societies, and become also doctrinaires in Buddhism. They are the people who know what is Buddhism and determine what makes up Buddhism.

So far, they tell us that Buddhism is all about relief from suffering and the ultimate objective to get to nirvana.

All ye Westerners waxing eloquent about Buddhism, if you don't work out your relief from suffering by aspiring and laboring to wend your way to nirvana, you are just hitchhikers in the vehicle that is Buddhism, only going part way with Buddhism but not all the way to the final destination.

Or you are just like convenience seeking practical but partial live-in partners between what we now call boyfriends and girlfriends, but not committing yourselves to the whole relationship as defined in a society to be marriage. You might go for the sex, food, money, on call company, but not the whole package of marriage.


Anyway, I am glad to hear that even though a lot of Westerners converting to Buddhism don't go for karma, rebirth, nirvana, much less plan on living in the sangha, nonetheless you do get something like discipline of the body and calmness of mind, a sense of detachment from everything that is impermanent and transitory and fickle, like lust, friendship, romance, wealth yes, power, fame.

Now, I am making a list of things people get from Buddhism even though they don't buy the whole integral complete bargain that is Buddhism as invented, practiced, elaborated in the lands of Buddhism of the Far East, and developed and codified by the peoples who are born into and live in and think Buddhism, with nirvana and relief of suffering uppermost and foremost in their heads.

Well, you do get something from Buddhism; but I tell you this, you can get it also much quicker and much cheaper in time, labor, and money elsewhere and else-how.

How? Use your creative brain if you have one.

Yrreg

=========================================

My words may not be soothing, but consider the ideas

The Buddhist non-self, and its implications, living the everyday non-self existence?
http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/ind...ost&pid=500486

[From the Kalama Sutra by Gautama]

1. Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it long ago.
2. Do not believe in traditions simply because they have been handed down for many generations.
3. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many.
4. Do not confirm anything just because it agrees with your scriptures.
5. Do not foolishly make assumptions.
6. Do not abruptly draw conclusions by what you see and hear.
7. Do not be fooled by outward appearances.
8. Do not hold on tightly to any view or idea just because you are comfortable with it.
9. Do not accept as fact anything that you yourself find to be logical.
10. Do not be convinced of anything out of respect and deference to your spiritual teachers.
11. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.

But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reasons and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.

See: http://www.buddhistinformation.com/the_kalama_sutra.htm
 
I do know what is the essential and integral Buddhism as understood by the folks who get born and grow up in Buddhist lands and civilizations and societies, and become also doctrinaires in Buddhism. They are the people who know what is Buddhism and determine what makes up Buddhism.

So far, they tell us that Buddhism is all about relief from suffering and the ultimate objective to get to nirvana.
yrreg, with all due respect, you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

To say this, you have to ignore the bulk of the Zen tradition, much of the writings of Thich Nhat Hanh, much of the writings of Sogyal Rinpoche, much of the teachings of the current Dalai Lama, etc.

What you're saying is that those Westerners who have practiced Buddhism somehow know less about it than a Westerner who hasn't. This is an odd claim.

Here are some classic Zen stories, for your "enlightenment":

**********

A Zen master met Hotei in the street and asked him, "What is the signficance of Zen?"

Hotei dropped his sack.

"Then," asked the other, "what is the actuality of Zen?"

Hotei swung his sack on his shoulder and continued on his way.

**********

A man crossing a field was chased by a wild tiger. Coming to a cliff, he grabbed a vine and swung over the egde. Trembling, he looked down, to see another tiger waiting at the bottom.

Two mice came from a hole in the cliff wall and began nibbling at the vine. The man saw a ripe strawberry growing hear him. Grasping the vine with one hand, he picked the strawberry with the other.

How sweet it tasted!

**********

Daiju visited master Baso in China. Baso asked "What do you seek?"

"Enlightenment", replied Daiju.

"You have your own treasure house", Baso answered. "Why do you search elsewhere?"

**********

Tetsugen decided to publish the sutras for the first time in Japanese.

He began by traveling and collecting donations. After 10 years, he had enough money to begin. But at that time, the Uji River overflowed. Famine followed. Tetsugen took all the money he had raised and spent it to save people from starvation. Then he began collecting anew.

Several years afterward, there was a great epidemic. Tetsugen again gave away everything he had collected.

A third time he started his work, and after 20 years he published the first edition of sutras, which can be seen today in the Obaku monastery in Kyoto.

The Japanese tell their children that Tetsugen made 3 sets of sutras, and the first 2 surpass the last.

**********

During one of Bankei's camps, a pupil was caught stealing. The matter was reported with the request that the culprit be expelled, but Bankei did not expel him. Later, the man was caught stealing again, and still Bankei did not expel him. So the students drew up a petition, stating that if the thief were not removed, they would all leave.

Bankei called an assembly, and told them, "You are all wise brothers. You know what is right and wrong. You may go somewhere else to study if you wish, but this poor brother does not know right from wrong. Who will teach him if I do not? I am going to keep him here even if all the rest of you leave."

**********

Nobushige came to Hakuin and asked, "Is there really a heaven and hell?"

"Who are you?" asked Hakuin.

"I am a samurai," said Nobushige.

"You're a soldier," said Hakuin. "No king would have you. You look like a beggar."

Nobushige put his hand on his sword hilt.

Hakuin continued, "So you have a sword. It's probably too dull to cut my head off."

Deeply insulted, Nobushige drew his sword. Hakuin said, "Here open the gates of hell!"

At these words, the samuri sheathed his sword and bowed.

"Here open the gates of heaven," said Hakuin.

**********

The emperor asked Gudo, "Where does an enlightened man go when he dies?"

Gudo answered, "I don't know."

"Why don't you know?" asked the emperor.

Gudo said, "Because I haven't died yet."

**********

One day, four traveling monks stopped by Hogen's remote temple and asked to camp in his yard.

While they were building a fire, Hogen heard them arguing about subjectivity. He joined them and said, "That rock over there -- is it inside or outside your mind?"

One monk answered, "From the Buddhist viewpoint everything is an objectification of mind, so I would say that the stone is inside my mind."

"Your head must be very heavy," said Hogen, "carrying around a rock like that."

**********

A rich man asked Sengai to write a blessing for the prosperity of his family.

Sengai obtained a large sheet of paper and wrote, "Father dies, son dies, grandson dies."

The rich man became very angry. "Do you think this is a joke?" he said.

"Not at all," said Sengai. "If you should die before your son, it would grieve you greatly. If your grandson should die before your son, you would both be broken hearted. If your family, generation after generation, passes away in the order I have named, this will be a great prosperity."

**********

A priest boasted to Bankei, "The founder of our sect has such miraculous powers that he held a brush in his hand on one bank of a river, and his attendant held up a paper on the other bank, and the teacher wrote the holy name of Amida through the air. Can you do such wonderful things?"

Bankei answered, "My miracle is that when I am hungry I eat, and when I feel thirsty I drink."

**********

While Tosui was making vinegar, a beggar gave him a picture of the Buddha. Tosui hung it on the wall of his hut and put a sign beside it. The sign read: "Mr. Amida Buddha: This room is very small. I can let you remain as a transient. Just don't think I'm asking you to help me be reborn in your paradise."

**********

Buddha said, "Nirvana is a waking nightmare."

**********

Buddha said, "Please don't think that, by achieving enlightenment, I have gained anything."

**********

Buddha said, "Existence is misery."

**********

A monk asked Joshu, "Does a dog have a Buddha nature?"

Joshu answered, "No".

**********

A monk asked Tozan when he was weighing flax, "What is Buddha?"

Tozan said, "This flax weighs 3 pounds."

**********

A monk asked Ummon, "What is Buddha?"

Ummon said, "Dried dung."

**********

In other words, yrreg, enlightenment is not nirvana in all traditions. I know it would be much easier for your crusade if that were so. But it is not.

In fact, enlightenment is not even enlightenment.

The most fundamental Western mistake about Buddhism is to think it's necessarily like Western religion, which focuses on heaven and hell, on God, on reward. Buddhism focuses much more on practice, on living your daily life.

Yes, Buddhism does spill a lot of ink -- some of it worth reading, much of it not -- on the cessation of suffering. But the best teachers will not promise any pie-in-the-sky release from all pain.

And yes, there's a lot of esoteric debate about the nature of Nirvana. That's why reforms are necessary every couple of centuries, to remind people that there's no point in debating such things.

The fact is, Buddhism can be very practical, very down to earth (it can also be total b**ls**t). And sure, there are other ways to go. But Buddhist practice -- or, at least, one flavor of it -- worked very well for me. You may claim to have a better way, but you weren't there to offer it, so it's not relevant to me.

And since you obviously have no idea what my practice was, you're not in any position to disparage it.

And from your sweeping statements regarding Buddhism, which are incorrect, you are also in no position to go debunking it.
 
A man crossing a field was chased by a wild tiger. Coming to a cliff, he grabbed a vine and swung over the egde. Trembling, he looked down, to see another tiger waiting at the bottom.

Two mice came from a hole in the cliff wall and began nibbling at the vine. The man saw a ripe strawberry growing hear him. Grasping the vine with one hand, he picked the strawberry with the other.

How sweet it tasted!

They had this one on king of the hill.
 
What do I stand to get from Buddhism?
I think the answer to this is clearly, "Nothing".

What does any Buddhist stand to get from Buddhism?
Since you apparently have already created an answer for yourself, why bother asking?

What does Gautama stand to get from preaching Buddhism?
You'd have to ask him, and I'm afraid he's dead.

Recently I received by postal mail a free issue of some magazine which is starting off, completely free; but with the free issue there is an invitation to sign up and pay up for a six months subscription -- it is a biweekly.

So, I wrote back, thanking them for the free issue, and asking them whether they would be generous to just give me a six months free subscription, completely free, except to give them feedbacks about what can be improved in their magazine and how.

So far no answer, and I don't think they will ever reply, unless and until there is new marketing manager who threw away all previous files and therefore does not know about my request, then he will send me another free issue with a similar invitation to subscribe.
Of course. Why would they send free magazines? They would soon have to stop because they'd go broke. That would be stupid.

Did they disappoint you by not being stupid?

But what about the inputs I have to put in to get Nirvana? Very simple:

Accept the Four Noble Truths and Perform the Eightfold Noble Path.

And how do I know that they make sense and are efficacious or they produce or lead me to Nirvana? Simple again: by Buddhist meditation whereby you will be liberated from your ignorance and thereby also your desire which is the cause of suffering.
Well, if you read about the noble truths and the eightfold path and it doesn't appeal to you, then I wouldn't recommend becoming Buddhist. Seems pretty simple to me.

Now that the word suffering has appeared, I realize that the whole of Buddhism is all about getting rid of suffering.

All right very good, I can understand suffering, but Nirvana is essentially most fuzzy, even Gautama himself says that Nirvana is being and non-being, and Buddhists after him insist that the self is non-self; so Nirvana is the being and non-being of the non-self for Buddhists after the departure of Gautama to his Nirvana loft -- even though no Buddhist can produce any Buddhist scripture where Gautama categorically states that the self is non-self or in simple language, there is no self.
If Gautama didn't say this, then why do you believe it's the cornerstone of Buddhism?

Well, good, at least I stand to get rid of suffering with Buddhism, but when?

I invite the Buddhists in this forum to enlighten me as to when I will be rid of suffering with and through Buddhism.
You? Never.
 
Or you are just like convenience seeking practical but partial live-in partners between what we now call boyfriends and girlfriends, but not committing yourselves to the whole relationship as defined in a society to be marriage. You might go for the sex, food, money, on call company, but not the whole package of marriage.

Why should I commit to anything for your convenience? I'm also Agnostic so if you'd like to complain about me not committing, there's another chance for you.

Pope JP once complained that Catholics in the U.S. were "Cafeteria Catholics" who, instead of buying the whole Catholic package, picked and chose from those tenents of the Catholic faith that they liked the most. He was (of course) referring to birth control and divorce, but I could never understand his problem.

No one has the ultimate truth about what happens after we die, and any opinions we have on the matter should be personal. If I like the notion that I should love my neighbor, but also believe in a woman's right to choose abortion, am I not "picking and choosing" what I like about Catholicism? If I believe that I have a right to defend myself vigorously when attacked, but don't believe that means strapping on a C4 vest and blowing up innocent people, am I not picking & choosing the best that Islam might offer?

I don't understand your personal tirade against Buddhism, but I find it somewhat amusing that you're picking on one of the most innocuous religions in the world.

Frankly, I think you need a hobby. :)
 
I am not a Buddhist but I do know what is the essential and integral Buddhism as understood by the folks who get born and grow up in Buddhist lands and civilizations and societies, and become also doctrinaires in Buddhism. They are the people who know what is Buddhism and determine what makes up Buddhism.

So far, they tell us that Buddhism is all about relief from suffering and the ultimate objective to get to nirvana.

All ye Westerners waxing eloquent about Buddhism, if you don't work out your relief from suffering by aspiring and laboring to wend your way to nirvana, you are just hitchhikers in the vehicle that is Buddhism, only going part way with Buddhism but not all the way to the final destination.

Or you are just like convenience seeking practical but partial live-in partners between what we now call boyfriends and girlfriends, but not committing yourselves to the whole relationship as defined in a society to be marriage. You might go for the sex, food, money, on call company, but not the whole package of marriage.


Anyway, I am glad to hear that even though a lot of Westerners converting to Buddhism don't go for karma, rebirth, nirvana, much less plan on living in the sangha, nonetheless you do get something like discipline of the body and calmness of mind, a sense of detachment from everything that is impermanent and transitory and fickle, like lust, friendship, romance, wealth yes, power, fame.

Now, I am making a list of things people get from Buddhism even though they don't buy the whole integral complete bargain that is Buddhism as invented, practiced, elaborated in the lands of Buddhism of the Far East, and developed and codified by the peoples who are born into and live in and think Buddhism, with nirvana and relief of suffering uppermost and foremost in their heads.

Well, you do get something from Buddhism; but I tell you this, you can get it also much quicker and much cheaper in time, labor, and money elsewhere and else-how.

How? Use your creative brain if you have one.

Yrreg

=========================================

My words may not be soothing, but consider the ideas

The Buddhist non-self, and its implications, living the everyday non-self existence?
http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/ind...ost&pid=500486

[From the Kalama Sutra by Gautama]

1. Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it long ago.
2. Do not believe in traditions simply because they have been handed down for many generations.
3. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many.
4. Do not confirm anything just because it agrees with your scriptures.
5. Do not foolishly make assumptions.
6. Do not abruptly draw conclusions by what you see and hear.
7. Do not be fooled by outward appearances.
8. Do not hold on tightly to any view or idea just because you are comfortable with it.
9. Do not accept as fact anything that you yourself find to be logical.
10. Do not be convinced of anything out of respect and deference to your spiritual teachers.
11. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.

But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reasons and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.

See: http://www.buddhistinformation.com/the_kalama_sutra.htm


Ah, the argument from 'common wisdom' or populism.

There are people foolish enough to say that jesus would support the Iraq War, and they are Xians to boot. that does mean that Jesus taught the war was a needful thing

At one time the catholic church taught the masses that the world was flat and that was a commonly held belief.

So just because someone who is a buddhist or from a bhuddist country says that nibbanna is a goal that neesds to be attained and that westerners miss the boat because they do not strive for nibbanna does not mean you are correct.

The buddha taught that there is no self, there is no reincarnation, and he did not ever discuss life after death. So just as in the King James version of the new testament Jesus never said that there was a hell, many Xians insist on preaching that hell and retribution are part of christ's teachings, and jesus never said he came back from the dead either.

So while it is a common belief in buddhist countries that nibbanna is a goal to work towards, that is not what the buddha, the alleged historical buddha, taught.

People have wierd things to say about Niels Bohr and Albert Eistien as well, it doesn't mean that they taught the studd thier followers say.

So there are the teachings of the buddha, the teachins of the followers and the path of the buddha and the paths of the followers.

None are right, none are wrong, all are unique and interdependant.

Well, you do get something from Buddhism; but I tell you this, you can get it also much quicker and much cheaper in time, labor, and money elsewhere and else-how.

How? Use your creative brain if you have one.

So what are the tenants we can learn from Yrreg, what are your principles and practices, we may learn from your wisdom, if you enlighten us. I have drank from many well, some water is pure, some is not, but it is all water. I have walked many paths and seen many things and I have found that usualy the thoughts and perspectives of others can be helpful to me in finding my own wisdom.

The teachings of the buddha are shared by many traditions, some are unique and some are not.

What is the wisdom of Yrreg?
 
what kind of lack of testicular fortitude is required before someone jumps on the internet, finds the most anti-religious forum they can, picks on the most passive religion they can, and then ends up getting shot down anyway?
 
Hail to JREF Forum, the most receptive to free thought and free speech. 1

Thanks to everyone here who react to my thoughts and talks.

Thanks also most gratefully to James Randi and the people managing this forum, it is genuinely the most receptive to free thought and free speech.

I had been to several other forums taking pride and outspoken about free thought and free speech, but when I wrote against Buddhism and Buddhists the way and even more diplomatically than I write here, I got thrown out by the ears.

You see: a lot of people in the West who really long for religion and can't find it fashionable in the traditional faiths of the West, convince themselves that they have found the religion that fits their tastes in Buddhism, and join up at least for the meditation psychotherapy, and get very defensive and protective and thereby obscurantist with their new found faith, which they take on like a paramour of which nothing critical can be tolerated.

These are the folks who also aspire to positions of power in web forums with business signboards sporting free thought and free speech, volunteering for non-paying contributions as moderators and administrators; and when they get inside, then they exercise the excision scalpel against any member who writes habitually in critique of Buddhism and Buddhist.

But not here in this JREF, they don't accept anyone for moderators or administrators who are at least giving the odor of being minimally even closet Buddhists, like doing Buddhist meditation or mastering the Buddhist art of non-self.

Anyway, so far I have not seen any such actuations from the moderators and administrator so this forum. Hail to them all.

The only time that I was given a warning it was on the occasion of citing internet texts, in my posts on acupuncture, not under copyright; but since the forum considered at that time any long quotations to be for their purposes copyright matters, I was given such a warning. However, later on after seeing that warning every time I logged in to the forum for several months, one morning the warning disappeared; and I presumed that they finally decided that such a blanket prohibition on presumptive premises was not warranted according to the sound exigencies of academic research and communication.

Again, thanks to James Randi and the people running this forum.

And thanks to all who react to my thoughts and talks here, even though the Buddhists here or hitchhiking Buddhists here would like to see me thrown out here by my ears.

See next post for more digression but really connected with the topic of this thread by way of corollary materials.

Yrreg

=========================================

My words may not be soothing, but consider the ideas

The Buddhist non-self, and its implications, living the everyday non-self existence?
http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/ind...ost&pid=500486

[From the Kalama Sutra by Gautama]

1. Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it long ago.
2. Do not believe in traditions simply because they have been handed down for many generations.
3. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many.
4. Do not confirm anything just because it agrees with your scriptures.
5. Do not foolishly make assumptions.
6. Do not abruptly draw conclusions by what you see and hear.
7. Do not be fooled by outward appearances.
8. Do not hold on tightly to any view or idea just because you are comfortable with it.
9. Do not accept as fact anything that you yourself find to be logical.
10. Do not be convinced of anything out of respect and deference to your spiritual teachers.
11. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.

But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reasons and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.

See: http://www.buddhistinformation.com/the_kalama_sutra.htm
 
Hail to JREF Forum, the most receptive to free thought and free speech. 2

I was away several weeks in a Buddhist forum founded and operated by Westerners converted to Buddhism.

E-sangha, Buddhist Forum and Buddhism Forum
http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/index.php?act=idx

This is a forum that practices censorship and terminates membership for socalled disputing and disparaging Buddha and Buddhism. Consider this letter I sent to the global moderator xxxxxx in reply to his termination of my membership:


[See xxxxxx's pm to me below. ][
For my posts in the forum, see here.
Hi xxxxxx:

It is common practice and everyone knows that for people participating in web forums to remain incognito and assume a personality in the forum which is not the actual one of his real self outside the web

People participate in web forums for information, reaction, guidance, communion of feeling, encouragement, etc., everything that people do outside the web but with more of freedom to talk about things they would not talk about with strangers in outside the web real life.

On this basis the web forum is a very good way for people, fellow humans, to help each other and hopefully to advance the good aspirations and realization of these aspirations, toward the common welfare of mankind.

Of course we are aware that the web forum is being used also for the most baneful of purposes, like pornography and terrorism -- and good governments of the world are trying their utmost to control these uses of the web, and I am of the conviction that the battle against such abuses of the web is being won everyday, because I have this idea that good will always overcome evil.

I am sorry that you and the powers that be have decided to terminate my participation in your Buddhist forum, that is one example of censorship and the motivation behind such a move from your part is not to the advancement of human knowledge and human collaboration toward mutual understanding and acceptance.

But I must commend you for your continued tolerance at this point in time for me to use this private message to communicate with you, at least it is one indication of a mind and heart to still desire to hear from people like yours truly.

Will you also take away this access from me to you and other participants of the E-Sangha forum? If you do, then I must deplore such obscurantism in you and on the part of your fellow powers that be in this forum.

This is most tragic, when we are living in a world today among people who do think and hope for the unity of mankind at least in regard to their freedom to think and exchange views on everything that is to the advancement of knowledge and the fostering of goodness among men, tragic because you are going in the opposite direction.

Such a direction seeks to bring back mankind to the darkness of unreason, which I am of the firm conviction to be for the ill of mankind.

And it is a sad but certain proof that for most men and in particular for you and the powers that be here in this forum, you are acting more emotionally than being rational, a most mournful confirmation of my fear that men do act more from emotions than reason -- when with the appearance of reason in man, man is ordained, as can be seen with his very use of reason, to control and guide his emotions to lofty ends; instead people like you prefer to succumb to your emotions instead of letting reason rule over everything in your whole humanity.

To sum up, I am not in despair just the same, that people of reason will always prevail over people of emotions, because men of reason will always see more and further than men of emotions, and thus they will always succeed in swaying the hearts of men of emotions -- unless men of emotions have totally lost whatever modicum of reason that might still be flickering like a candle flame in the storm (smile here, being poetic), or fallen into total and irredeemable insanity.

<br />Pachomius,<br /><br />I am not sure why you are implying you are Thai but it is evident you are posting out of xxxxxx in the xxxxxx. <br /><br />You were warned earlier not to disparage the Buddha or his Teachings on this Buddhist List, and you were told what the penalty would be. You chose to ignore the warning. You will now be disabled from posting. Do not attempt to join under another user name.<br /><br />metta<br />xxxxxx<br /><br />


I just hope that the JREF Forum remain true to the ideal of free thought and free speech, and make sure that not even closet or meditation Buddhists get to be moderators and administrators here.

Yrreg

=========================================

My words may not be soothing, but consider the ideas

The Buddhist non-self, and its implications, living the everyday non-self existence?
http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/ind...ost&pid=500486

[From the Kalama Sutra by Gautama]

1. Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it long ago.
2. Do not believe in traditions simply because they have been handed down for many generations.
3. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many.
4. Do not confirm anything just because it agrees with your scriptures.
5. Do not foolishly make assumptions.
6. Do not abruptly draw conclusions by what you see and hear.
7. Do not be fooled by outward appearances.
8. Do not hold on tightly to any view or idea just because you are comfortable with it.
9. Do not accept as fact anything that you yourself find to be logical.
10. Do not be convinced of anything out of respect and deference to your spiritual teachers.
11. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.

But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reasons and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.

See: http://www.buddhistinformation.com/the_kalama_sutra.htm
 
I just hope that the JREF Forum remain true to the ideal of free thought and free speech, and make sure that not even closet or meditation Buddhists get to be moderators and administrators here.

Yrreg

. . .because there is no better way to celebrate free thought and speech than by banning a group of people from a job based on their religion. :rolleyes:

This is quite possibly the most moronic statement I have ever heard.

And we have at least one open Buddhist on the admin/mod staff if I'm not mistaken.
 
even though the Buddhists here or hitchhiking Buddhists here would like to see me thrown out here by my ears.

I am not free of desire, but let me assure you, I have no desire to see you removed from the forum. Far as I can tell, you've done nothing here to violate any rules.
 

Back
Top Bottom