• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Raw evidence is something that is not contrivable. It really is of the scene.
But yet everything on your website is contrived by you from what you are mistakenly interpreting from the pictures you downloaded from other sites on the internet.

All your "raw" evidence is just your observations of pictures. What do you have to back up those observations? Nothing. Just your imagination.
 
Chris, have you bothered to contact those who were involved with teh design and construction of the twin towers? You've now had 48 hours to do so.
 
I answered this a few pages back which means the obfuscatiors efforts are effective.

To illustrate it I posted an animated gif,

WTC 1 animated gif of the impact.

WTC 2 animated gif of the impact.

The obfuscatiors, cried, "That doesn't show the core." and my answer was lost in what followed.

The core of Tower one was holed all the way through by the right engine of flight 11, fuel flowed it through and spread fuel through the core. The central stair and the western stair were destroyed. The engine bounced off the inside of the farside perimeter walls not exiting the tower. The left engine hit interior walls and stayed inside the core on the east half. Falling debris had partially blocked the east stairwell and the fuel exploded making the environment full of smoke and fire, uninhabitable. The core was protection from the aluminum plane but not the engine. It was about 2.5 thick at impact height.

The core of tower 2 was holed by the left engine of flight 175 which was traveling 100 MPH faster than 11 and the core was about 4 feet thick at that elevation. Smaller amounts of fuel were in WTC 2 as much of the fuel burned outside the east wall at impact. Tower 2 had 2 functioning stairwells and little smoke in the core.

Flight 11 made a solid hit and only the engines penetrated. That is pretty good protection, but the fire issue made the environment uninhabitable.

The gifs show much of the plane wreckage passing through the core area.
 
The core of Tower one was holed all the way through by the right engine of flight 11, fuel flowed it through and spread fuel through the core. The central stair and the western stair were destroyed. The engine bounced off the inside of the farside perimeter walls not exiting the tower. The left engine hit interior walls and stayed inside the core on the east half. Falling debris had partially blocked the east stairwell and the fuel exploded making the environment full of smoke and fire, uninhabitable. The core was protection from the aluminum plane but not the engine. It was about 2.5 thick at impact height.

And you know this how?

How did an engine 'bounce' off a wall, yet a landing gear take an entire column tree out?
 
Go ahead, bring me evidence for your steel core columns and I'll show you the concrete core. That is all you can do because the steel core columns did not exist.


We,ve all showed you time and time again. You ignored it all and came up with some crazy, lame excuse to brush them off.
They truth is not going away because you don't agree or like what you see Chris.
Your showing yourself to be a dishonest person.
 
just waded through that thread, interesting to note that none of the other contributors rallied to your concrete core cause.

i was intrigued though, by your statement that you interviewed a mohawk ironworker about his involvement in the construction of the WTC. you infer that he was "afraid" to talk to you about certain matters, (in particular "the special security measures taken during the construction of each floor") this sounds incredible to me. can you elaborate further? i.e. more about the "special security measures" or just general information like the guys name or even when/where did the interview take place?

BV




I mentioned but didn't discuss the security issues with the Windwalkers.

Ask Phil Jayhan about the forced evacuations of the floors, he remembers hearing that back in the late 1970's.
 
homers efforts at deception

But yet everything on your website is contrived by you from what you are mistakenly interpreting from the pictures you downloaded from other sites on the internet.

All your "raw" evidence is just your observations of pictures. What do you have to back up those observations? Nothing. Just your imagination.

The non appearance of steel core columns is not a contrivance. You have provided no reasonable alternate interpretations.
 
My thoughts on that part of the conversation:

mohawk ironworker: "Concrete core? I'm afraid you're insane pal, that's so stupid, I don't want talk about it"

What Christophera heard "Concrete core? I'm afraid ... I don't want talk about it"

The documentary showed me the concrete core over and over and the Mohawks were doing much stee erection.

The concrete core is documented here.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

Got link to your page documenting the steel core columns from raw evidence from the demo?
 
The non appearance of steel core columns is not a contrivance. You have provided no reasonable alternate interpretations.

kyle.jpg
 
Got link to your page documenting the steel core columns from raw evidence from the demo?

many links have been given to document the steel columns that made up the steel core of the WTC towers. your puerile attempt to qualify the question ("raw evidence from the demo") only serves to show your total disregard to the facts as presented. the steel core was destroyed during the collapse of the towers. numerous photographs (your "raw evidence") exist of the mangled columns that the steel core was fabricated of littering the site immediately following 9/11.


btw why haven't you explained the discrepancies in your "interview" with the mohawk ironworker? i mean the dates the man is supposed to have worked at the WTC?

do you still insinuate that this man is keeping quiet about the horrendous crimes that were committed that day? is he also part of this huge widespread conspiracy of silence?

do you know that many mohawk ironworkers were involved in the clean-up of GZ following 9/11? perhaps with your connections in that area you could contact some of those people and discover more evidence to back up your theory?

BV
 
Last edited:
Chris, I see you have no demo images of your concrete core at elevation for WTC1. How is that possible? Obviously if there are no photos at elevation during the demolition of WTC1's concrete core, it doesn't exist. Right?
 
The non appearance of steel core columns is not a contrivance. You have provided no reasonable alternate interpretations.

Yep I sure have. You've just ignored it because it did not agree with your belief.

I showed that What you interpret as a 17 foot concrete wall was nothing more that debris obscured by dust and smoke. I showed you the core structure from several diffreent angle. And you did not reply to it.
I showed how the mesurments you noted on the picture did not match up or coincide.
Other people here have posted pictures of the steel column core (so did jakx in the other forum) but you ignore all that. You've already admitted that you would never accept any other explination other than your own.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom