• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Internet Becomes Sentient

BTW, thanks joller, petre and wybili for your technical expertise. I'm but a lowly database programmer who dables in VBasic, C++, HTML and SQL.

I knew what was going on I just couldn't explain it beyond the general.

01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100111 01110101 01111001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100111 01110010 01100101 01100001 01110100 00100001
 
Any of you guys know what this means? 10001110101
Yes,

There are two answers, they are

1.) 01000010 01100101 01100111 01101001 01101110 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110011 01100101 01110001 01110101 01100101 01101110 01100011 01100101 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110010 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01010010 01001110 01000001

2.) 01000011 01101100 01110101 01110100 01100011 01101000 00100000 01110011 01101111 01101110 01100111
 
Yes,

There are two answers, they are

1.) 01000010 01100101 01100111 01101001 01101110 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110011 01100101 01110001 01110101 01100101 01101110 01100011 01100101 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110010 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01010010 01001110 01000001

2.) 01000011 01101100 01110101 01110100 01100011 01101000 00100000 01110011 01101111 01101110 01100111

Ahh, well that clears it up!:rolleyes: :)

It's the name of a song I heard a while back, I was just wondering if it translated into "enchilada" or somesuch. I'll stop derailing now.
 
Ahh, well that clears it up!:rolleyes: :)

It's the name of a song I heard a while back, I was just wondering if it translated into "enchilada" or somesuch. I'll stop derailing now.
:D

I converted the answers to binary. I'll PM them to you.
 
Hey hodgy,

this is now out of order now, It got minimized and forgotten.


Sinsanity, is it possible that you could accept that a group of disinterested and well-informed people (this forum) have examined your ideas, applied their own expert judgement and come to the conclusion that what you are perceiving is effectively an illusion?

No, there's not a chance of that until a few, I don't need a lot, actually post something that makes me think someone actually knows what they are talking about around here. Experts?

There have been three hundred forty one replies here, I'll say half of them are my posts. That means there have been about one hundred and seventy posts from this forums members. Out of the one hundred and seventy posts, two have demonstrated to me that they understood what the article is about. That means that 98.82352 percent of the posts didn’t get it. If this like the weegee board, cool, I’ll go on my way, after thanking everyone. But so far I’ve heard everything from weegee boards to data mining, I believe there are people here that can figure this out and tell me what happened. Most posts were just people trying to get a laugh or boost their ego by ridicule. Or asking questions that they already knew the answer to, or . . . . whatever.



You could think of it like colour-blindness, a mirage, or something like that.

Yes, That is reassuring.


We can see your reasoning but we can also see something that you are overlooking.

And what would that be?


Sometimes I have an opinion that my colleagues tell me is wrong. I fight it for a while but ultimately I have to accept the majority opinion. Often, a few weeks later I realise that the majority opinion was right after all (of course I can't admit that :).

Yes, that is reassuring too. Time helps.



Thanks hodgy, and I'm sorry.I needed to go off a little, and it landed on you. But I'm not worried, somehow, I can tell, it's not going to bother you,
 
Yes, there is a Unicode bug, I agree. Thank you for your time.

Can you confirm or deny if all the software and applications used by all applications related to the Unicode bug , were released before 911?
It doesn't rule 8 matter if they were released prior to 911 or not. I know you are desperately trying to ignore this, but ASCII code was invented sometime before 1970 and Unicode was created sometime before 1990, and EVER SINCE THEN, anybody with both codelists on a piece of paper could have found your "message". It had absolutely nothing to do with Notepad, Windows, or the internet (and you never even came close to explain how the internet could be involved at all). The only slightly startling coincidence in all this is that a mundane software bug happened to expose this particular combination, but even that is hardly amazing; there must be millions of possible ASCII strings that happen to translate into a Unicode sequence that, with sufficient imaginative interpretation, could be seen as a "secret message".

... Oh, why do I bother? :rolleyes:

Hans
 
No, there's not a chance of that until a few, I don't need a lot, actually post something that makes me think someone actually knows what they are talking about around here. Experts?

So how are we lacking?

And please, do explain our shortcoming here, in simple turns. It should be obvious that pointing at the same website over and over again isn't working.

There have been three hundred forty one replies here, I'll say half of them are my posts. That means there have been about one hundred and seventy posts from this forums members. Out of the one hundred and seventy posts, two have demonstrated to me that they understood what the article is about.

1) The article isn't written very clear
2) You missundersood the article
3) Those two posters understood the article
4) All of the rest of us are missunderstanding the article.
5) All of the rest of us aren't just able to show you that we understood the article
6) any combination thereof.

I think it would be best to forget all about the article. Using the article here clearly isn't very useful.

That means that 98.82352 percent of the posts didn’t get it. If this like the weegee board, cool, I’ll go on my way, after thanking everyone. But so far I’ve heard everything from weegee boards to data mining, I believe there are people here that can figure this out and tell me what happened.

People have told you what was happening. At least as far as the observable universe is concerned, there has been an objective breakdown of every little step of the things that have been happening. (Regardless of whether anyone shares your interpretation of the outcome.)

Hence, so long as your interpretation/explanantion of the whole affair does not match the observable facts, you have nothing of merit to say on the subject. Alternatively, you could question our view of the process as far as it is observable/explainable.

Your theory/explanation has got to account for the fact that the described phenomena would have occurred prior to 9/11 if anyone had bothered to try. It has to account for the fact the described procedures would have yielded the exact same results if nothing remarkable hat ever happened on 9/11.

Forget whether the answers are accurate or relevant. Forget that we disagree on this, or that posters here dispute that you asked any "questions". (At least for a moment.) And the explain why any of this is meaningful, when it is obvious that the results are independent of what happened on 9/11, that the results would have been available years before 9/11 and that computers and the internet are not a necessary part of what has been observed.

Please explain, how despite all of this, you can reach the conclusions that you did.

The results were the same before 9/11 and they would be the same if there had never been a 9/11.

Most posts were just people trying to get a laugh or boost their ego by ridicule. Or asking questions that they already knew the answer to, or . . . . whatever.

A rhetorical question doesn't always require an answer - but often a reply nonetheless.

Not all the questions that have been labelled by you as such did come from people that knew the answer. And instead of just giving plain answers, you preferred to dance around your accusations that other people did know the answers.

Thanks hodgy, and I'm sorry.I needed to go off a little, and it landed on you. But I'm not worried, somehow, I can tell, it's not going to bother you,

For what it's worth,m your style is starting to bother me. I appreciate a bit of teasing on all sides. But you seem to be unwilling to help with certain questions. It would possibly be more productive if you could at least just ignore those, or maybe tell us once that you won't/can't answer them.

Rasmus.
 
Sigh,

I worked on a reply for this for an hour or so and lost it. I Might have saved some of it, I'll see what I can do. Sigh, I'll have to do it over again.

I think this is all very interesting.

Is it possible to show that the bug existed prior to 2001 or prior to the planning of 911?

If so, it makes it unlikely that the bug was created in order to give Sinsanity information about 911.

Yes, my point exactly. Can someone prove that the Unicode bug was created before 911. I think you realize how much I would like to know this. and if this is true, Then it is indeed more amazing.

I've seen two posts here that say it was all programmed before 911, can anyone verify this as fact



The other thing I would like more information on, is how Sinsanity formulated the questions to be typed into WordPad. I know some of the questions could be typed into WordPad directly, like bush hid the facts. But others questions seem to require some kind of processing before being typed into WordPad.


You must have missed some of my posts.

I think this was a one time event.

My first translation was "bush hid the facts".
Then I tried the set of words "then all oil wanes".
Then I tried “fake war wtc plane”.
Then I asked a question "wtc who did it airz".
Then I tried "xxxx xxx xxx xxxxx".
This made me start looking at the individual letters.
Then I tried "aaaa aaa aaa aaaaa".
"bbbb bbb bbb bbbbb", etc.

The vast majority of what happened was single individual characters.

I only asked two questions using mixed letters:

“wtc who did it airz”
“wtc who did it ajfk”

Both not in the paranormal state.

All the rest of this was single characters.

There are eighty-four letters and symbols on the main section of the standard keyboard. Ten don't work in the bug. So there are seventy-four available to use. I used fifty-four of them. About seventy-three percent of them. 25

In the paranormal state, I looked at the translations of the last half of the alphabet first, for example, "rrrr rrr rrr rrrrr" with out asking any questions. I just looked at the translations and went wow. Then I asked a bunch of questions directly, using random symbols (*$}>@) and capital letters. looking for specific answers.

The answers of course will not change if you use the same characters of the keyboard. I checked that right away. So how can I use them as a proof of anything? Most of the event was just single characters, and all the paranormal activity was single characters. Over ninty percent of the translations were single characters. Ninety-three percent of the questions were single characters.



It also doesn't seem to be relevant to argue that Sinsanity only sees a connection between the translated Chinese characters and 911 because he was reading up on the conspiracy theories at the time. In Sinsanity's view, that is simply the reason why the internet chose to pass this information to Sinsanity.


This is a negative statement, not a question. So I don't know quite how to answer it. It is not the only connection. "bush hid the facts went viral, maybe twenty million people saw it. You act like poor little sinsanity2006 pulled this out of no where but his back pocket from his secret cavern where everyone wears purple robes. It wasn't like that. It went out to millions of people.



If we accept that the bug was hidden in notepad in order to get information out about 911; then it makes more sense to assume the bug was placed there by an employee of Microsoft who thought they knew the truth. This is a simpler explanation than assuming the internet developed sentience and placed the bug there. I would like to know if Sinsanity has any evidence for the more complex theory.

I would love this to be true. So far two people have said that it existed before 911, I am holding out for it to be post 911, I would like that, and I am waiting for real confirmation and somewhere I can verify it. The evidence is in the data and the event.


In summary I think Sinsanity should think about the following:
a) is it likely that the internet achieved sentience?

Three weeks ago = Maybe, but it'll be a long time.
Two weeks ago = Absolutely!
One week ago = I doubt it.
Today = Maybe, and it might be soon, if not already.

That's why I'm here.


b) is it likely that the internet placed the bug in notepad, rather than an employee of Microsoft, or no one at all?

I don't think I ever said that the internet placed the bug in notepad. Though now that you mention it, I will add it to the list of possibilities, not probable, but possible.


c) is your method for turning your questions into entries in notepad realistic? Is it possible that you subconsciously selected questions that gave interesting answers? Were there any questions that you entered that gave boring answers? If so, how many?

I only entered two questions into the notebook bug to get answers.

d) are your translations of the notepad responses entirely accurate? Are there possible translations that you are ignoring because they don't relate to 911? Have you had to work hard to relate the translations to 911?

Of course I could have made mistakes. I am far from perfect and openly admit it. The translations were easy to see. I wouldn’t be here if this were not obvious to anyone that is familiar with the 911 controversy. They scream out to be seen.


If you think that your thinking was unreasonable at any stage, then you might want to consider what you can do about it.

As others have said, I’m way to close to this to be completely objective, I can see that. That’s why I’m here. If I had all this under control, I wouldn’t be here.


 
Let me explain it this way:

When Joller says:the symbols can be interpreted anyway you want, since it's just data.
And you reply: No they can't. They are Chinese symbols that translate to English words. These words can be looked up in a dictionary

You are missing the point. Joller isn't arguing that you can't look them up in a dictionary. He is saying you are intrepreting those words to fit into your 911 conspiracy theory when they would mean something else to someone with a different mindset.

Ladies and gentleman (and sinsanity), an excersize in data mining with a splash of confirmation bias:
________________________________________________________________
Here I will show you how those same chinese characters can be force fit into a whole different paradigm, using your website. Your translations will be in bold, your interpreations be in italics, and my interpretations will in normal font.

Imagine that rather than having my mind filled with 911 conspiracy rubbish before stumbling across this, instead I was trying to decide whether or not to cross-dress and get some strange ass.

Away we go!

1. To pick up; collect; gather.
Your interpretation: Yup, that connects to getting 911 clues.
Mine: looks like if I decide to go out, I'll be getting some.
Here the words can mean picking up pieces of evidence, or picking up someone to sleep with and gathering phone numbers.

.......




You bring this? You do this? This is outrageous! Go put on the dunce cap and stand in the corner for ten minutes!

I ask you "what have I got in my pocket?" and you answer "something!" And you say that settles it? Hogwash!

What happened to the other events that were going to use as a base. A way to qualify themes of an event for a number of numbers of events? You said you’d set up similar . . . somethings. Set up a model and see if I get that eighty or ninety percent. Oh man. Was that you, let me, look. Sigh. I can’t find it.

How do you guys keep track of stuff easily? Everything? Can I get a mouse pointer that rolls over the word in a spectrum linking to the same word in this blog and linking to the same word elsewhere differentiated by color?


Here it is, it was roger:

What would I do? Well, I imagine it would be quite shocking to me if this happened. I guess I would devise a way to figure out if this is in fact happening, or if I was mistaken.

Thinking about that a moment, here's my course of action:


1. Make a list of 10 questions about a topic, say 9/11.
2. Have a friend make a list of 10 questions about a different topic, say Ansel Adams (or whatever topic you want, just make it quite different than 9/11.
3. Get a third friend. He is to do the following 10 times in a row:
* flip a coin. If heads, take a question from the 9/11 list, if tails, the Ansel Adams list.
* ask the internet the question, and record the translation. On a separate piece of paper,record whether the question was about 9/11 or Ansel Adams.

4. Give the 10 answers to you. You do not know if the question asked for each one was about 9/11 or Ansel Adams. For each of the answers, look at the Chinese translation and figure out if the question was about 9/11 or Ansel Adams. Record your response.

When you are done, see how accurate you were. If you got 8-10 right, you may be onto something here. In that case try the test several more times.

Do you understand why the test is structured this way, and why it will tell us if you are really getting answers from the internet or not?

Hope this helps.

This is what I’m talking about. Some kind of scientific method.

I ask what color is the sky and you say “yes”. No, no, this is not right.

When people talk about Nostradamus there is a reason they do, somehow he said things related to history and the future. Right? How many Hillers and, I don’t know, that’s the only one I can remember. And that made him into an apparent clairvoyant. I’ve seen that stuff on the TV. I saw what people talking about him being good at predicting the future. Comparing the amount of lines of Nostradamus to the points that match things in history has been done. Someone knows how to do this. This event and the resulting data, kicks Nostradamus’ butt up and down both sides of the sidewalk.

Somehow I need other events as a baseline then analyze the comparisons.

You bring a shotgun to a pillow fight? Ridiculous!



Do I really have to go on? I'm not even to the part where I would get to talk about my privates being bald and bare, or daubing on my makeup.

No, please don't go on, It's giving me a headache.


As Joller was saying before you brushed him off, this is how astrology works. They give you a list of ambiguous nonsense, and you fit it into your life and make it make sense, however you can. In fact, it helps to be intelligent to do this. It makes it easier to make connections between ambiguous words and whatever is occuring in your life.

Baloney. The words are not ambiguous to anyone that knows about the 911 controversy.

If this doesn't show you how you came to these conclusions, nothing will. I could make a convincing argument that all these could relate to a day playing baseball. So could you, sins, if you felt like it. As with your 911 theory, with crossdressing theory, not all the words apply easily. And as like you, I chose to de-emphasize those words, and focus on the one that worked well. This is confirmation bias. There is nothing paranormal about what happened to you, unless you choose to believe that it just happened to me too. In which case, my lady friend might not be too happy.

Sorry, then nothing will. I expected much more from you. I am severly dissappointed.
 
Yes, my point exactly. Can someone prove that the Unicode bug was created before 911. I think you realize how much I would like to know this. and if this is true, Then it is indeed more amazing.

For the 100th time:

ASCII and Unicode have existed long before the bug has been detected.
the bug has most likely existed long before a version of notepad used it, and only that version of notepad - which isn't buggy in itself - appears to be past 911.

If that is not good enough for you, I suggest you do your own research.

This is a negative statement, not a question. So I don't know quite how to answer it. It is not the only connection. "bush hid the facts went viral, maybe twenty million people saw it. You act like poor little sinsanity2006 pulled this out of no where but his back pocket from his secret cavern where everyone wears purple robes. It wasn't like that. It went out to millions of people.

Poor little sinsanity2006 is the only one who believes that there is meaning behind this. Everybody else thinks it's an amusing bug or easteregg. Everybody that bothers to look into it understands it's not even an amusing bug, but a plain boring bug.

The fact that millions of people can replicate a result using identical software and identical procedures is hardly surprising at all. If 2 million peolpe watch the same TV channel at the same time, they will see the same thing. But even if t's a joint stage show of Randi, David Copperfield, Siegfried and Roy it doesn#t make the magic that you see real.

I would love this to be true.

Why

So far two people have said that it existed before 911, I am holding out for it to be post 911, I would like that, and I am waiting for real confirmation and somewhere I can verify it. The evidence is in the data and the event.

Can we add to the record that you are biased?

As others have said, I’m way to close to this to be completely objective, I can see that. That’s why I’m here. If I had all this under control, I wouldn’t be here.

I guess that means "yes".

Then why can't yousee that just maybe you are more likely to see a connection to 911 where none exists? (Not even here, but in general)
 
I am amazed about your insistance on this, sinsanity2006. You do bring honour to your name - which I read as Sin/Sanity. No offense.

I am also amazed by the other posters in this thread, namely RandFan, Rasmus, Lamuella, joller, wybili, MRC_Hans and petre. You continue to show a great deal of patience and seemingly want to earn the E for education.
Respect.
 
I didn't come here for a social experience, or to make friends, or to be scorned, or to hang out somewhere that I show off how smart I am by insult, I came to a place where I thought I could get answers to about something I can't explain. So far I am very disappointed. And I've thought about where else I can go. I don’t want to go to "the world's biggest conspiracy" website; I wanted to go somewhere I could get some answers. I came here.

I’m beginning to see maybe I should be somewhere else, too, I think a lot of you would agree for different reasons and with different destinations. You all are debunkers. I think I need actual scientists that can do things with computers, you know like those guys that are determining peoples emotions using facial scans. Find the guys that are doing the theoretical work two or three steps up from facial recognize thing. This is gonna be difficult.

Wikipedia says the notepad Unicode detection bug was first reported on May 18th. I just spent some time looking at websites about the Unicode bug, I couldn't find any web site that was dated before June 14th. I received the email on June 14th, two weeks ago. I found out that the symbols resulting from the notepad bug were Chinese symbols on the 15th. On the 16th I started translating stuff and writing it down, on the morning of the 18th the event happened (I could be a day off either way). The rest of the 18th and 19th I formed it as a story, the one at http://www.dreamslaughter.com/parasentient/paradoc.htm. On the 20th and for a few days, I emailing some and posting on some forums. Then it changed and I landed here.

After the event happened, first I was drained and slept. When I woke up I was borderline ecstatic. I was ready to conquer the world, change the way humanity looked at itself, and make the world a better place. I was the focal point for one of the most important events in human history. I was gonna be rich and famous, wouldn't have to work the hard jobs. All I had to do was let everyone know. For a few days, I posted on random forums, emailed websites, thought about how to make this happen. Then it started to change. It was like a sine wave, starting at the top with the event and me being manic, then over the next several days moving to depressed. I’m now moving back to the base line without going manic again, so I’m not worried about my emotional well being. I am still worrried about my intellectual well being.

You ever look back at something you have written and regret what you wrote, you made a silly typo, like the guy on vacation that telegraphed his wife “Hi darling, wish you were her.”

When I look back at what I’ve written, I am uncomfortable with it. But those pesky little answers are still there, staring at me.

Worse, what I'm saying is about stuff that is so ingrained in everyone's life. It's all just fun and games when you're surfing the web looking at conspiracy sites. Great fun. It's like making jokes about your neighbor being a serial killer, then you think you see him carrying a body into his house. Everything changes. You can't prove it, but your mind is changed.

There is a part of me that want's to apologise to the people involved, the families of the victims, the military, the government. It's has become too serious. To real, too uncomfortable. If this is coincedence, this is so unfair to the people involved, and I want to know the answer.

That's why I'm here. There are ways to tell if this is just random. Out of three hundred and ninty posts. only one, roger, had addressed the issue I brought here. He showed how to do it. Make models of three of four events. Have disinterested people, who know about the subject, make a list of the salient aspects of the events. Using the answers I got, have disinterested people see what the match ups are. If the average is that you have a twenty or thiry percent correlation and the 911 thing has a eight or ninty percent correlation, somethings going on. That's my position, the collelation is extream in this case. And I'm gonna work to get this done. So far, no one here has showed that to me and I I do it myself I will believe it. I don't know If I should be the one to create this list of events. I can see typical events and I'm gonna make a list and do this myself.

My first event is the Titanic, I'm gonna go to a few websites and make a list of aspects of the event. and compare them to answers I got. I don't know how to keep my bias out of it, but I really want the facts, and as I do this, please be a check on me. Somehow I have to get a list of the salient points of 911. Then other events; the discovery of the wheel, or the murder of Jesus, or Galileo’s trial, Columbus' voyage, the birth of Bill Hicks.

There are two versions of answers as well. The first is the alphabet. Half the translations were just the letters of the alphabet and I looked at the answers; an amazing similarity to 911 stuff. This is what the above testing method will deal with.

Then there were a series of questions asked directly, I need help here. How would you set something up to analyze how answers to direct questions of one event, correspond to answers to a direct question of another event? Do I make a list of possible answers and if the answer falls into that it’s a hit?


But first, I'd like to short circuit it for a moment.

If it is coincidence, I will go away relieved, with incredible gratitude to a website and the people here. and put a disclaimer on that webpage saying the story is fiction and let it all go. I may do that anyway.


......




But what if the relation is completely whacked? What if there is something there. What then? I'd like to see where you all would go with this for a moment? What if all the programming was done before 911 and the answers are ninety percent?




What then?












.
 
Sinsanity2006, if you really feel that only one post in this thread helped you, that's just too bad.

Your perception of reality and how to approach it obviously varies greatly from most of the other participants in this thread.

I also point out that you want to examine your imagined "problem" as thoroughly as possible - yet you seem to generalize the behaviour of the other 37 (!) thread posters.



"What if" questions do not appeal to me. Especially when there is very little chance of finding a satisfactory answer - or when that answer very likely can be found in the data around you.



You owe it to your son to ditch the first three letters of your forum nick.
 
OK.

I have read the article for a third time and it seems Sinsanity did this:

He first of all typed some statements in directly, e.g.
'bush hid the facts'.

Then he just typed in strings with all the same letters, e.g:
'xxxx xxx xxx xxxxx'

Then he wondered if he was communicating telepathically while typing in a string of capital Ns

The translation of the Chinese letters produced from that string convinced him that he was communicating telepathically.

Then he continued to type in strings of characters, but before each string he thought a particular question that he was wanting to know the answer to.

The translations of the resulting Chinese characters still seemed convincing responses.

If I am correct in my summary, I would like Sinsanity to wonder whether his state of mind at the time could have had anything to do with his conclusion that he was communicating telepathically. I would also like him to consider whether the responses to his questions were really useful. Maybe he should have another look at that section of his document.

You would like me to wonder? Don't worry, That's already covered.

Yes, I think my state of mind did have something to do with it. I think it may have been imperative for what happened to happen.

The last part of this is vague. Useful? Which section? I’m not sure how to answer it.
 
So which of your alternative reasons would make you think this is not paranormal and is not connected with 9/11?

Thanks for a reasonable question.

:)

If some programmer manipulated the Unicode bug to output things about 911.

Eveyone here keeps talking about how it was all programmed before 911. I don't know if that is true. I'm sure the Kangxi index was there before 911, maybe a few revisions or additions, that's not the issue. The date I need to know is the date that the original NT version of notebook was programmed and the date that the Windows XP application that works with notepad.


The scientific method is to think of all options and then consider/test which is most likely. Given that there are alternatives then the paranormal and 9/11 possibilty is not proven.

Yes. There are alternatives until I find out the date of the original NT version of notepad. Then the alternatives become much less likely. And even then I'm not saying that the Unicode bug is paranormal. The event was paranormal, not the software.
 
I didn't come here for a social experience, or to make friends, or to be scorned, or to hang out somewhere that I show off how smart I am by insult, I came to a place where I thought I could get answers to about something I can't explain. So far I am very disappointed.

Very disappointed because the comprehensive explanations given to you don't support your idea. Well, we do apologize, but take heart: Your idea is not the first one to not survive the first meeting with reality, and it won't be the last.

And I've thought about where else I can go.

Plenty of woo sites out there, where they'll gobble up every word you say.

I don’t want to go to "the world's biggest conspiracy" website; I wanted to go somewhere I could get some answers. I came here.

But you didn't want the answers you got.

I’m beginning to see maybe I should be somewhere else, too, I think a lot of you would agree for different reasons and with different destinations. You all are debunkers. I think I need actual scientists that can do things with computers,

And they will tell you the same thing.

Wikipedia says the notepad Unicode detection bug was first reported on May 18th. I just spent some time looking at websites about the Unicode bug, I couldn't find any web site that was dated before June 14th.

The whole thing has nothing to do with the unicode bug.

I am still worrried about my intellectual well being.

With EXCELLENT reason, I must say.

That's why I'm here. There are ways to tell if this is just random.

And we told you. But you refuse to listen.

If it is coincidence, I will go away relieved, with incredible gratitude to a website and the people here. and put a disclaimer on that webpage saying the story is fiction and let it all go. I may do that anyway.

No, you won't.

Oh, and bye :nope:.

Hans
 

Back
Top Bottom