• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Internet Becomes Sentient

even if, EVEN IF there was any truth in this, and the messages you received were more than just you picking a nonexistent signal out of noise...

why do you think it's "the internet" talking to you?

why couldn't it be, say, a prankster working for Microsoft who wanted to put some tinfoil beanie material in there?
Thanks,

You know, I have asked so many questions that Sinsanity simply will not answer. Why the 4-3-3-5 letter combination? Odd. Let's assume for the sake of argument that there is something paranormal going on, why does "it" (whoever whatever "it" is) only work in a very specific way?

Let's assume that it is utilizing this bug, Sinsanity admits that it is a bug, why return chinese charachters?

Why provide "reasonable" answers that require translation?

Fact: Sinsanity doesn't know.

So, based on his ignorance he decides that it is parnormal while Occam's razor points to the fact that there is nothing paranormal going on here.
 
Please, we both know what the bug is, why it happens and that it exists. Can we please move past that and to the real issue.
You rely on this bug to arrive at your conclusion that there is something paranormal going on, yes or no?
 
Yes I do. And if you understood what was going on here, you would understand the basis.

so it's the fault of us mere mortals for not understanding the incredible truths that the Internet has revealed to you in chinese, rather than being the fault of the imperfect connections in your brain, leading you to hear orchestras in white noise
 
I'm not going to comment on this for twenty four hour to see if you can answer your own question. If it gets close to time being up, go ask a friend if they can figure out who Rice might be.

Wait I think I have the answer. Rice in relation to 911.....I spent hours searching for connections until it hit me!

All the furniture, walls, materials, everything was on fire...So 9/11 caused the WTC to turn crispy...or krispy...

Rice...Krispy.... RICE KRISPIES!

I got it...the truth..Snap!, Crackle!, and Pop! are the 9/11 masterminds!
 
To date you have not identified what the real issue is. You keep going back to this bug. If it is not relevant then why bring it up at all.

The bug is part of it, an important part. But it is not the amazing thing about this.

The so called answers to the questions are predictible based on the flaw in the software. The answers are Chinese charachters mapped in the software.

So, please, what is the real issue?

The real issue is that when asked paranormally about 911 it answered with reasonable answers.

This is one of those silly questions that you have to stop asking, I have explained this so many times, it's funny. Please stop asking a question I have answered at least a dozen times.
 
The issue is that the Internet became parasentient and revealed the truth about 911.
Evidence please?

Please post a question and answer from the brown text from:

http://www.dreamslaughter.com/parasentient/paradoc.htm

and we will discuss it here.
I'm curious, why won't you?

Please, we both know what the bug is, why it happens and that it exists. Can we please move past that and to the real issue.
It's really not that simple because the bug is central to your hypothesis. Without it you have no argument.

What unwarranted assumption.am I making?
That I would not accept empirical data.

I never said I was equivalent to Copernicus, you did, I said I knew how he felt.
No, you asked me if I would treat Copernicus in the same manner. If Copernicus offered a ridiculous proposition and could not explain the proposition and refused to answer questions and the hypothesis was not grounded in empirical science he would deserve to be mocked and ridiculed.

I have no problem with critical thinking, unfortunately your critical thinking is not solving this mystery.
Your lack of critical thinking is preventing you from seeing that there is no mystery.

Which conclusions are those?
That there is something paranormal going on here. That there are "reasonable answers" to your questions.
 
The bug is part of it, an important part. But it is not the amazing thing about this.
Then it must be examined because if we remove it from your hypothesis it falls apart.

The real issue is that when asked paranormally about 911 it answered with reasonable answers.
(emphasis mine)

1.) I reject the assumption of "paranormally" as you have not established it.
2.) Reasonable is subjective and an interpretation on your part. I see nothing reasonable in the so-called answers.
 
Wait I think I have the answer. Rice in relation to 911.....I spent hours searching for connections until it hit me!

All the furniture, walls, materials, everything was on fire...So 9/11 caused the WTC to turn crispy...or krispy...

Rice...Krispy.... RICE KRISPIES!

I got it...the truth..Snap!, Crackle!, and Pop! are the 9/11 masterminds!
BINGO!

That's right, any interpretation is as reasonable as any other.

Hey, the characters are Chinese, rice is a main staple of the Chinese, that's it, the Chinese are behind 9/11.
 
Wait I think I have the answer. Rice in relation to 911.....I spent hours searching for connections until it hit me!

All the furniture, walls, materials, everything was on fire...So 9/11 caused the WTC to turn crispy...or krispy...

Rice...Krispy.... RICE KRISPIES!

I got it...the truth..Snap!, Crackle!, and Pop! are the 9/11 masterminds!


Wait there is more.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_Krispies

Taglines
What do your Rice Krispies say to you? (1990 - 1998)
Wake up call to the world. (1998 - 2001)
Snap, Crackle, Pop; Rice Krispies! (1968 - present)
Can you hear it? (Canada, present)

Notice the dates of the second tagline...They were warning us....my God...how were we so blind...
 
You clearly did. You decided which answers made sense. Most of the responses had nothing to do with the so-called question.

lol, lol, lol, This is the funniest post you have made yet. You claim that you can read my mind and firmly reject the same for me. Is there any chance that you can see how completely absurd your statement is. I really don't think you can. lol, lol, lol, lol, lol, lol. Hahahahaha. ROTFLMAO. (that means Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off)

Please post what responses had nothing to do with the so called response.

One more time, what is the real issue.

This is the last time I will respond to this question. When asked paranormally about 911, the internet responded with reasonable answers to the questions.

What is happening is based on a flaw in the windows algorithm. I have demonstrated that. Nothing more, nothing less.

Please, we both know what the bug is, why it happens and that it exists. Can we please move past that and to the real issue.

Did you try and ask the questions I posed.

1.) Is Sinsantiy an idiot?
2.) Is RandFan a genius?

The paranormal communication did not happen with the method you are suggesting. If you read the article you would know that.
 
Not if you won't tell us what it is.

Did you ask your paranormal these questions?

1.) Is Sinsantiy an idiot?
2.) Is RandFan a genius?

I've already explained this above. Please don't repeat questions I have already answered. It is a waste of both our time.
 
There is no where to get to. It is a technological dead end. We understand what is happening and why.

1.) There is a flaw in the windows algorithm.
2.) Notepad swaps Chinese characters for the English ones we type in based on this flaw.
3.) You translate these Chinese characters back to English and force meaning where there is none.

Please, we both know what the bug is, why it happens and that it exists. Can we please move past that and to the real issue.

Please stop asking questions I have already answered, it is a waste of both our time.

Question: Logically it stands to reason that the paranormal computer can comprehend both English and Chinese. Why does it not respond in English?

I don't know.


Have you tried my questions?

spin san ity idiot
rand fan isg enius

Please stop asking questions I have already answered, it is a waste of both our time.
 
Hold on, this is an answer to a question, "is spinsanity an idiot"? I inerpret that it is saying "yes". Why don't you?

? Why do you think that there is something going on here?

I see no reason to assume that there is. Because I am a programmer and because I am capable of critical thinking and because I utilize parsimony in my problem solving (I'm a paid problem solver BTW) it is obvious to me that there is nothing going on here.

I can change my mind but you will have to provide empirical data.

Copernicus used empirical data, do you have any empirical data?

The empirical data is the answers that were given to my questions.

You have a funny habit of ignoring what you don't want to discuss and keep going back to questions I already answered. Is this tactic to wear me down. Are you really interested in the truth? I have my doubts.
 
let's try a different tack: what is it precisely that you think the Internet is trying to say to you? Why can't it communicate in English if it can hear you in English?

It was very clear about revealing the real events about 911.

I don't know why. I cna't explain what a lot of people do, let alone what the internet has in mind.
 
lol, lol, lol, This is the funniest post you have made yet. You claim that you can read my mind and firmly reject the same for me. Is there any chance that you can see how completely absurd your statement is. I really don't think you can. lol, lol, lol, lol, lol, lol. Hahahahaha. ROTFLMAO. (that means Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off)
No, I don't claim to be able to read your mind. I'm drawing an inference. But hey, prove me wrong. Post the questions and answers and demonstrate that the ALL of the answers are "reasonable"?

This is the last time I will respond to this question. When asked paranormally about 911, the internet responded with reasonable answers to the questions.
1.) I reject "parnormally" because it has not been established.

2.) You assert that the responses are reasonable, can you demonstrate it.

Please, we both know what the bug is, why it happens and that it exists. Can we please move past that and to the real issue.
The bug is:

1.) The issue.
2.) The only issue.
3.) The answer to what you call the "mystery".

I can't move past it because it is the answer.

Your argument:

Proposition: The internet is sentient.
Premise: Software bug produces random chinese charachters.

I can't simply avoid your premise because quite simply, that is all there is.

The paranormal communication did not happen with the method you are suggesting. If you read the article you would know that.
Actually, it did.
 
I've already explained this above. Please don't repeat questions I have already answered. It is a waste of both our time.
Then you agree that based on your logic the paranormal thinks you are paranoid at best and an idiot at worst?
 

Back
Top Bottom