Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apollyon said:
iow, it somehow disappeared into nothingness which is why you can't produce any evidence of it?
Click to expand...

You are lost in a frenzy of opposition. The floors were concrete and everyone knows it. Spend some time looking for photographic evidence from the towers demise and find an image of a steel core column in the core area, That will prove your point, which you are failing to support.
 
Christophera said:
No. I found it on this site http://www.toad.com/****nyccensors/.
Click to expand...
Alright; as a public service, here's that link without the Rule #8 violation: http://tinyurl.com/87xdq

Now give us specifics. Which photo are you referring to, and what do you see? In your response, address the resolution of the photo, and the resultant detail level and scale of objects.

Also, comment on the credibility of the photographs; did you take them? Did you modify them in any way?
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
Please provide evidence supporting your claim other than the mis interpretation of pictures from construction. If you do not like my interpretations then provide reasonable alternatives. Something I've been asking for since the beginning.
Click to expand...
Here's a "reasonable alternative" for ya, which has been posted here a number of times: the core.

87904495b879ebd4b.jpg

87904496cc3612098.jpg
 
For argument's sake, let's say that there was a concrete core with C4-coated 3" rebar at 4' centers. You say the government provided the C4 coated rebar. Please provide evidence that it was the government, and not anyone else.
 
Christophera said:
I guess you forgot what you are doing.

You are trying to find an alternative to this image.
Click to expand...

No, TheFed was converting your link to one whose URL did not violate Rule 8. Tinyurl is a site for doing such things.

Please provide evidence supporting your claim other than the interpretation of pictures post-collapse.
 
Gravy said:
Here's a "reasonable alternative" for ya, which has been posted here a number of times: the core.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehost/87904495b879ebd4b.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehost/87904496cc3612098.jpg[/qimg]​
Click to expand...

You shall have to explain exactly what is alternative about it.

You've got one picture from the construction that has been mis represented as showing steel core columns.

You also have a diagram that is a misrepresentation of the core. It is in fact the same one I used to draw the actual core of WTC 1 on.
 
Christophera said:
Find a specific image there that shows steel core columns at some elevation above ground in order to substanciate that claim.
Click to expand...

Chris, do you acknowledge that the posters here have shown you countless images from different sources and you have shown only a few pictures from your crappy site? Now tell me who is unsubstancial?
 
mortimer said:
For argument's sake, let's say that there was a concrete core with C4-coated 3" rebar at 4' centers. You say the government provided the C4 coated rebar. Please provide evidence that it was the government, and not anyone else.
Click to expand...


A government entity built the tower.
 
Actually, it was an alien entity. It can clearly be seen in this photo...


ah, never mind.
 
Christophera said:
You've got one picture from the construction that has been mis represented as showing steel core columns.
Click to expand...
Er, Christophera, nothing's misrepresented. That's the core of the building. Reality's a bitch, ain't it?
 
Pardalis said:
Chris, do you acknowledge that the posters here have shown you countless images from different sources and you have shown only a few pictures from your crappy site? Now tell me who is unsubstancial?
Click to expand...

I think they've shown one image that whould show the steel core columns if they existed. Another showed the interior box columns and hravy claimed they were core columns. They were not inside the core. They were along the edge of the flooring.

My site has atleast 5 images that show what can only be concrete and they show the areas where steel core columns would be seen if they existed. They are not seen.
 

Attachments

  • core.corner.arrow.col.jpg
    core.corner.arrow.col.jpg
    58.2 KB · Views: 17
Christophera said:
Whoa. Lost in a generalization.

yea it is the core, but no steel core columns are seen inside it with th emass to qualify as such.

No steel columns are seen inside the core but a massive concrete block is seen.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=2281&stc=1&d=1151001616
Click to expand...

How come you know what that picture is anyway, do you have a diagram of where this piece of rubble is situated on ground zero? How come you're so sure it's a part of any of the towers? Where is this picture taken from? Who took it?

ETA: Do you have any other picture of that same rubble but from a different angle?
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't that be funny if it turns out all along that this is from WTC7, or something? Hehe.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom