The magic invisible Slag Fairy.Who advocates handouts to the lazy?
I would consider them to be conservatives.The last five years have shown us that conservatives have nothing against government programs or social engineering.
Who advocates handouts to the lazy?
I would consider them to be conservatives.
The last five years have shown us that conservatives have nothing against government programs or social engineering.
I.E. True conservatives.
Who advocates handouts to the lazy?
No, I am a true conservative.
Pat Robertson and his followers are fundy perverts.
See the difference?
Or that the Republican party is not always conservative.
Jesse Jackson, off the top of my head. Many members of the Democratic Party. Even a lot of Republicans.
In your head, not in reality.
They're still true conservatives, family values voters, godly americans and the "moral majority".
I see a false dichotomy.
Evidence that Jesse Jackson and many members of the Dem Party advocate handouts to the lazy?
No, just because fundy perverts have hijacked the term in the last twenty years, does not make them conservatives.
In your head, not in reality.
Right, and only true scotsmen wear boxers under their kilts.
That seems to be the argument you are making.
Well to be fair, there is an internationally recognized word for the type of conservative that Scrut is, and that Pat Robinson isn't, the trouble is, that word is "liberal"."Seems" being the operative word. This, like your claim that you're a "true conservative" while Pat Robertson isn't, is another one of your hallucinations.
I wouldn't consider them to be conservatives.
Well to be fair, there is an internationally recognized word for the type of conservative that Scrut is, and that Pat Robinson isn't, the trouble is, that word is "liberal".