• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Karl Rove exonerated

peptoabysmal

Illuminator
Joined
Sep 27, 2002
Messages
3,466
Here's something I'll bet you won't see on the front page of the NYT.

Luskin had just received a fax from Patrick Fitzgerald, the special counsel in the case, saying that he was formally notifying Luskin that absent any unexpected developments, he does not anticipate seeking any criminal charges against Rove.
Rove: Glad the Burden Is Lifted

Maybe they will run the story as "Rove avoids endictment" come to think of it. That still makes him sound a bit sinister.
 
This is the end. The theocratic Bush regime is stripping away the last of our civil rights. Meanwhile the real villians go free.
 
That's going to be "The Daily Kos"'s version of events, in any rate.

By the way, there is a poster on "The Daily Kos" called "CheChe" (IIRC) which--every week or two it seems--claims that his young, innocent daughter wants him to explain why the bad, bad man who is president did this or that. So (the posts says) he sits with her on their living-room couch and explains how evil Bush is, until they both, inevitably, are crying.

Poor couch.
 
You guys and your silly conspiracy theories.
 
So they're not going to press charges against Rove...And this means he's "exonerated."

I wait with bated breath for the "Cynthia McKinney exonerated" thread.
 
I assume you do not accept that he is guilty as vile degraded sin.

Here's something I'll bet you won't see on the front page of the NYT.



Maybe they will run the story as "Rove avoids endictment" come to think of it. That still makes him sound a bit sinister.

But maybe you are just being "funny" - if they report it that way, they are being truthful!!!!
 
The NY Times Headline was "No Rove Charges Over Testimony in C.I.A. Leak"

I don't know, does that sound like they were trying to spin it as Rove being sinister? It sounds like their usual slightly boring headline to me.
 
"not pressing charges" does not equate to "exonerated". Simply, "we could not get enough evidence for the grand jury to return a true bill."
 
So they're not going to press charges against Rove...And this means he's "exonerated."

Yes. That "innocent until proven guilty" comes in useful sometimes, doesn't it?

Or does it not apply to Republicans?
 
Yes. That "innocent until proven guilty" comes in useful sometimes, doesn't it?

Or does it not apply to Republicans?

Still waiting for that "Cynthia McKinney exonerated" thread...I guess I'll be waiting a while for that one. Funny how that works.
 
Still waiting for that "Cynthia McKinney exonerated" thread...I guess I'll be waiting a while for that one. Funny how that works.

Didin't you hear? Only fat, sleezy, older, balding white nerd guys are considered "innocent until proven guilty". Darkies, especially female ones, are guilty de facto.
 
Still waiting for that "Cynthia McKinney exonerated" thread...I guess I'll be waiting a while for that one. Funny how that works.

OJ Simpson was innocent. A jury said he was so it must be true.
 
Still waiting for that "Cynthia McKinney exonerated" thread...I guess I'll be waiting a while for that one. Funny how that works.
There's a Latin saying that "the law doesn't concern itself with trivialities." And face it, the McKinney flap, while endlessly enjoyable, was a triviality. There was probably plenty of evidence to convict her - eyewitnesses, video, etc. - but did you really think there was going to be a trial because she shoved a cop?

Rove, OTOH, is accused (at least by the Unhinged Left) of having betrayed national security. Do you think maybe it's possible there's insufficient evidence to convict the wily evil genius of a crime because he was enough of a wily evil genius to avoid committing a crime? Or do you think he's such a wily evil genius that he was able to somehow commit a crime without leaving any fingerprints?
 
Yes. That "innocent until proven guilty" comes in useful sometimes, doesn't it?

Or does it not apply to Republicans?

It does, of course.... but note... that receiving the benefit of a reasonable doubt (or in this case, lack of evidence) is not the same as "exoneration".

"Exoneration" as I see it, is positive proof of one's innocence. In some cases exoneration is as impossible as presuming a negative (I think this case counts as that).

Well, that's me... let me look at a dictionary.

exculpate

One entry found for exculpate.
Main Entry: ex·cul·pate
Pronunciation: 'ek-(")sk&l-"pAt, (")ek-'
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): -pat·ed; -pat·ing
Etymology: Medieval Latin exculpatus, past participle of exculpare, from Latin ex- + culpa blame
: to clear from alleged fault or guilt
- ex·cul·pa·tion /"ek-(")sk&l-'pA-sh&n/ noun
synonyms [SIZE=-1]EXCULPATE[/SIZE], [SIZE=-1]ABSOLVE[/SIZE], [SIZE=-1]EXONERATE[/SIZE], [SIZE=-1]ACQUIT[/SIZE], [SIZE=-1]VINDICATE [/SIZE]mean to free from a charge. [SIZE=-1]EXCULPATE [/SIZE]implies a clearing from blame or fault often in a matter of small importance <exculpating himself from the charge of overenthusiasm>. [SIZE=-1]ABSOLVE [/SIZE]implies a release either from an obligation that binds the conscience or from the consequences of disobeying the law or committing a sin <cannot be absolved of blame>. [SIZE=-1]EXONERATE [/SIZE]implies a complete clearance from an accusation or charge and from any attendant suspicion of blame or guilt <exonerated by the investigation>. [SIZE=-1]ACQUIT [/SIZE]implies a formal decision in one's favor with respect to a definite charge <voted to acquit the defendant>. [SIZE=-1]VINDICATE [/SIZE]may refer to things as well as persons that have been subjected to critical attack or imputation of guilt, weakness, or folly, and implies a clearing effected by proving the unfairness of such criticism or blame <her judgment was vindicated>.
pixt.gif
 

Back
Top Bottom