Dr Adequate
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2004
- Messages
- 17,766
Time to update "[swiki]9/11 coverup[/swiki]", I think.
Not so fast there. geggy showed us a link showing a possible, partial email from a structural engineer, maybe, from Texas, allegedly, without a name.
Snipping the list of sites PS, beautiful
Gravy, incase I haven't said it in the past few days, you are the man.
I also scratched my head over that statement, but I don't want to bring attention to it because I don't need the competition from PETA. i posted the link to my critique on that forum and was accused of being an "agent," but no one said "because you're an agent I'm strangling this puppy." Maybe what Logan meant is that we're animals and the CTists are torturing us.Tortured Animals?
I'm saying it didn't look like a controlled demo that is normally practiced in a regular building imploding project
I'm saying it (controlled demo) was done differently and uniquely for the towers to start imploding from the top
That's good enough for me. CD it is.Not so fast there. geggy showed us a link showing a possible, partial email from a structural engineer, maybe, from Texas, allegedly, without a name.
And you expect those links can trump that?
![]()
That's it! Dr. Adequate and aggle have hit on something important here, and I think we need a name for it. Ockham's kaleidoscope?
[/CENTER]
A great list of links, linked to from Perry Logan's site:
How 'bout Occam's Bowling Ball?I was thinking "Ockham's Play-Doh", to emphasize the point of more stuff being stuck on the outside of it.
Or:
Ockham's Spackle
Ockham's Gum-wad
Ockham's Toilet-Blockage
etc.
"Ockham's Play-Doh Toilet Wad Ball" just about covers it.I was thinking "Ockham's Play-Doh", to emphasize the point of more stuff being stuck on the outside of it.
Or:
Ockham's Spackle
Ockham's Gum-wad
Ockham's Toilet-Blockage
etc.
There's a lot on that page which isn't materially less out there than the CTers. I guess you can't stop the guy from linking you, but I think this is a case were you can be glad you don't have a web page of your own lest you feel pressured to return the favor.I also scratched my head over that statement, but I don't want to bring attention to it because I don't need the competition from PETA. i posted the link to my critique on that forum and was accused of being an "agent," but no one said "because you're an agent I'm strangling this puppy." Maybe what Logan meant is that we're animals and the CTists are torturing us.
How 'bout Occam's Bowling Ball?
As in: "He's as sharp as a bowling ball."
(Doing his best Merv Griffin) Ooooooh! That's good!You know how a snowball gets bigger and bigger as it rolls downhill?
"Ockham's Snowball".
There's a lot on that page which isn't materially less out there than the CTers. I guess you can't stop the guy from linking you, but I think this is a case were you can be glad you don't have a web page of your own lest you feel pressured to return the favor.
Imagine the planners of 9/11 sitting around a table, cooking up their scheme...
Planner One says, "Uh...we could make it look like fires brought down the towers. Let's throw in WTC7, too. Hu-hu-hu-hu!"
"You idiot!" snarls Planner Two. "That would be unprecedented in history! It would give the whole plan away! AARRGHH!"
(Planner Two smacks Planner One upside the head many times for suggesting such a stupid plan. And rightly so.)
Military Notification and Response. The first indication that the NORAD air defenders had of the second hijacked aircraft, United 175, came in a phone call from New York Center to NEADS at 9:03.The notice came at about the time the plane was hitting the South Tower.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm
I think we all missed something in guggy's quote from the report:
Bolding mine.
First report of the second aircraft, not first report of any aircraft.